<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: diff bet the /etc/shadow in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/diff-bet-the-etc-shadow/m-p/3847633#M274375</link>
    <description>Well since HP-UX doesn't have shadowed passwords, I wonder what this does?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://h20293.www2.hp.com/portal/swdepot/displayProductInfo.do?productNumber=ShadowPassword" target="_blank"&gt;http://h20293.www2.hp.com/portal/swdepot/displayProductInfo.do?productNumber=ShadowPassword&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However, as I mentioned before, the typical HP-UX is to use TCB rather than this solution.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:28:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>A. Clay Stephenson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-08-21T15:28:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>diff bet the /etc/shadow</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/diff-bet-the-etc-shadow/m-p/3847630#M274372</link>
      <description>dear all&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i want to know is there any diff between the /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow in hp-ux with other OS's such (AIX, Solaris, Linux...)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;if any? what is the diff? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks in adv.&lt;BR /&gt;regards&lt;BR /&gt;wish</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:17:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/diff-bet-the-etc-shadow/m-p/3847630#M274372</guid>
      <dc:creator>wish_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-21T15:17:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: diff bet the /etc/shadow</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/diff-bet-the-etc-shadow/m-p/3847631#M274373</link>
      <description>HP-UX doesn't have /etc/shadow file. Only it uses /etc/password file in non-trusted environment.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:21:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/diff-bet-the-etc-shadow/m-p/3847631#M274373</guid>
      <dc:creator>IT_2007</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-21T15:21:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: diff bet the /etc/shadow</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/diff-bet-the-etc-shadow/m-p/3847632#M274374</link>
      <description>Where it is implemented, no; however, very few HP-UX boxes actually use a shadowed passwd file (although there is a patch to enable it). HP-UX's normal approach is to use a Trusted database (TCB) that does more than an /etc/shadow file in that many more attributes are stored but, in addition, the users' password hashes are stored under /tcb as well and are only readable by root.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:25:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/diff-bet-the-etc-shadow/m-p/3847632#M274374</guid>
      <dc:creator>A. Clay Stephenson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-21T15:25:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: diff bet the /etc/shadow</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/diff-bet-the-etc-shadow/m-p/3847633#M274375</link>
      <description>Well since HP-UX doesn't have shadowed passwords, I wonder what this does?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://h20293.www2.hp.com/portal/swdepot/displayProductInfo.do?productNumber=ShadowPassword" target="_blank"&gt;http://h20293.www2.hp.com/portal/swdepot/displayProductInfo.do?productNumber=ShadowPassword&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However, as I mentioned before, the typical HP-UX is to use TCB rather than this solution.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:28:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/diff-bet-the-etc-shadow/m-p/3847633#M274375</guid>
      <dc:creator>A. Clay Stephenson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-21T15:28:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: diff bet the /etc/shadow</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/diff-bet-the-etc-shadow/m-p/3847634#M274376</link>
      <description>/etc/shadow can be installed on HP-UX and is essentially the same as other Unix systems -- with all the incumbent limitations like no password formation controls, only trivial expiration, no limitations of login periods, no password history, etc. In today's complex security environments, the legacy /etc/shadow method is not adequate, one of the reasons HP chose the TCB method for security many years ago. Legacy programs may not run in HP's TCB environment, but I view that as a good thing.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:43:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/diff-bet-the-etc-shadow/m-p/3847634#M274376</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bill Hassell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-21T16:43:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: diff bet the /etc/shadow</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/diff-bet-the-etc-shadow/m-p/3847635#M274377</link>
      <description>The answers re the feature sets vary somewhat from release to release.  It is true that the initial web release of shadow password support supported a restricted subset of the trusted mode features.  Longer term, trusted mode is being phased out, with its features generally being supported by userdb (see &lt;A href="http://docs.hp.com/en/5991-1101/ch08s08.html)," target="_blank"&gt;http://docs.hp.com/en/5991-1101/ch08s08.html),&lt;/A&gt; such that they can be used in combination with an /etc/shadow file.  Userdb provides a more extensible way of adding per-user attributes.  The intent is that users can get a broader range of features with fewer compatibility and code portability issues.  See security(4) and userdb(4) on your specific version of HP-UX for the latest information on the supported feature sets.  &lt;A href="http://docs.hp.com/en/5991-0791/ch01s01.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://docs.hp.com/en/5991-0791/ch01s01.html&lt;/A&gt; has additional information.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:32:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/diff-bet-the-etc-shadow/m-p/3847635#M274377</guid>
      <dc:creator>doug hosking</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-22T13:32:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: diff bet the /etc/shadow</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/diff-bet-the-etc-shadow/m-p/3847636#M274378</link>
      <description># man pwconv&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; pwconv(1M)                                                       pwconv(1M)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; NAME&lt;BR /&gt;      pwconv - install, update or check the /etc/shadow file&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# pwconv&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;*Warning*:  There is a restriction on the use of shadow password&lt;BR /&gt;functionality in this release of HP-UX.  Failure to consider this&lt;BR /&gt;limitation may lead to an inability to log in to the system after&lt;BR /&gt;the conversion is performed.  A system converted to use shadow&lt;BR /&gt;passwords is not compatible with any repository other than files&lt;BR /&gt;and ldap. This means that the passwd entry in the nsswitch.conf&lt;BR /&gt;file must not contain nis, nis+, or dce.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Would you like to proceed with the conversion? (yes/no):&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;11.23 box.&lt;BR /&gt;is HPUX doesnt support shadow passwd file?&lt;BR /&gt;it seems that pwconv can convert /etc/passwd to /etc/shadow.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:43:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/diff-bet-the-etc-shadow/m-p/3847636#M274378</guid>
      <dc:creator>inventsekar_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-22T13:43:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: diff bet the /etc/shadow</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/diff-bet-the-etc-shadow/m-p/3847637#M274379</link>
      <description>Sekar, 11.23 does support shadow passwords in a limited context, after installing the shadow password bundle.   The message you quote summarizes the restrictions.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:49:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/diff-bet-the-etc-shadow/m-p/3847637#M274379</guid>
      <dc:creator>doug hosking</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-22T14:49:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

