<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Tape devices with LUNs greater than 7 in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/tape-devices-with-luns-greater-than-7/m-p/3850096#M274693</link>
    <description>We have a fiber to scsi router with 9 devices attached to it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have found the HP knowledge base entry KBRC00010719, which describes the hard coded OS limit of 7 as the maximum lun number used for scsi.  It describes a system that is used for disk devices that automatically increments the target number when the lun id reaches 8, 16, 24, etc...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Why wasn't this same technique applied to tape devices?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Why have such a small limitation on LUNs in the first place, considering that most other *NIXs support 256 luns  (yes I know that Linux used to require a configuration change to enable 128-255).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;How do I get around this limitation?</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:59:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Larry Becke</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-08-24T12:59:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Tape devices with LUNs greater than 7</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/tape-devices-with-luns-greater-than-7/m-p/3850096#M274693</link>
      <description>We have a fiber to scsi router with 9 devices attached to it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have found the HP knowledge base entry KBRC00010719, which describes the hard coded OS limit of 7 as the maximum lun number used for scsi.  It describes a system that is used for disk devices that automatically increments the target number when the lun id reaches 8, 16, 24, etc...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Why wasn't this same technique applied to tape devices?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Why have such a small limitation on LUNs in the first place, considering that most other *NIXs support 256 luns  (yes I know that Linux used to require a configuration change to enable 128-255).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;How do I get around this limitation?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:59:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/tape-devices-with-luns-greater-than-7/m-p/3850096#M274693</guid>
      <dc:creator>Larry Becke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-24T12:59:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Tape devices with LUNs greater than 7</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/tape-devices-with-luns-greater-than-7/m-p/3850097#M274694</link>
      <description>Why ask why? It is what it is --- and it's documented. You might put in a request for a change.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:56:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/tape-devices-with-luns-greater-than-7/m-p/3850097#M274694</guid>
      <dc:creator>A. Clay Stephenson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-24T14:56:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

