<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Who is cluttering /var/tmp with char dev files rdskAAA* ? in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051703#M304611</link>
    <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;Hi Duncan,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;sorry for the belated reply.&lt;BR /&gt;I must had left office already yesterday when your last posting was submitted.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I had a look at the localmaplog in cstm.&lt;BR /&gt;Among other messages especially these two appear repeatedly which refer to the DVD drive I suppose:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thu Aug  9 14:25:19 2007: Tool completed with exit_status PROD_NOT_SUPPORTED&lt;BR /&gt;                          (3) indicating the tool exited because the product&lt;BR /&gt;                          identifier is not supported by this tool.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thu Aug  9 14:25:20 2007: Identify routine (scsi_arry) for hardware at path&lt;BR /&gt;                          (0/0/1/0.1) indicated hardware path is not supported.&lt;BR /&gt;                           A subsequent identify routine should support the&lt;BR /&gt;                          hardware.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thu Aug  9 14:25:20 2007: Hardware at path (0/0/1/0.1) and driver name (tgt) is&lt;BR /&gt;                          being ignored as entry in id_mod_xref file indicated&lt;BR /&gt;                          it should be ignored.  This hardware will not appear&lt;BR /&gt;                          in the map.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But as similar messages apear for other HW paths as well, I am not quite sure if this is evidence enough for some abnormality?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 01:36:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ralph Grothe</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-08-10T01:36:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Who is cluttering /var/tmp with char dev files rdskAAA* ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051670#M304578</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;it seems I have a berserk process that is creating character special files by the minute.&lt;BR /&gt;Since the devices are only one block in size we don't run into space limits that fast.&lt;BR /&gt;However, I am not sure about the inode count,&lt;BR /&gt;but assume, since it is an vxfs, this isn't hit either that soon.&lt;BR /&gt;Nevertheless, there had been accumulated over 100,000 device files.&lt;BR /&gt;They have all the major 203&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# ll -rt /var/tmp/rdskAAA*|tail -3&lt;BR /&gt;crw-------   1 root       root       203 0x001000 Aug  8 13:50 /var/tmp/rdskAAAa24366&lt;BR /&gt;crw-------   1 root       root       203 0x001000 Aug  8 13:50 /var/tmp/rdskAAAa24379&lt;BR /&gt;crw-------   1 root       root       203 0x001000 Aug  8 13:50 /var/tmp/rdskAAAa24389&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# lsdev 203&lt;BR /&gt;    Character     Block       Driver          Class&lt;BR /&gt;      203          -1         sctl            ctl&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;First I suspected an OmniBack process to be the culprit,&lt;BR /&gt;and we killed that and removed all rdskAAA* files.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But when I now find for them again that many in quite a short period&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# find /var/tmp -xdev -type c -name rdsk\*|wc -w   &lt;BR /&gt;361&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;and since OmniBack has been killed there's only some stm proc accessing /var/tmp now&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# lsof +d /var/tmp&lt;BR /&gt;COMMAND    PID USER   FD   TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF  NODE NAME&lt;BR /&gt;sysstat_e 5771 root    8w   REG 64,0x8        0 29107 /var/tmp/sysstat_em.fmt&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;# ps -fp 5771&lt;BR /&gt;     UID   PID  PPID  C    STIME TTY       TIME COMMAND&lt;BR /&gt;    root  5771     1  0  Jul  5  ?         1:04 /usr/sbin/stm/uut/bin/tools/monitor/sysstat_em&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I couldn't see fitting entries in syslog.log,&lt;BR /&gt;and the last event.log entry from EMS dates back to July 5th.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can anyone tell me if it really is STM that creates them, and for what purpose?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;On our other servers I cannot observe these strange character devices.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Ralph&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 07:00:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051670#M304578</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ralph Grothe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-08T07:00:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Who is cluttering /var/tmp with char dev files rdskAAA* ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051671#M304579</link>
      <description>What is your OS version ? &lt;BR /&gt;For 11.00 here is recomendations: &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;"The Sep 2002/A.34.00 version of OnlineDiag/STM contains further changes &lt;BR /&gt;to support the exclusion of removable media devices from polling. &lt;BR /&gt;Therefore, a recommendation was made to install the Sep 2002/A.34.00 &lt;BR /&gt;version of OnlineDiag/STM, along with the (required) EMS core patch, &lt;BR /&gt;PHSS_26871 or later.  Doing so resolved the problem. "&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;regards,&lt;BR /&gt;ivan</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 07:15:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051671#M304579</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ivan Krastev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-08T07:15:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Who is cluttering /var/tmp with char dev files rdskAAA* ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051672#M304580</link>
      <description>Hi Ivan,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;the OS is B.11.11&lt;BR /&gt;For STM on it I only found PHSS_34085 (which isn't installed) when querying HPs' patch database for sysstat_em.&lt;BR /&gt;But in its Readme I couldn't see mention of the symptom that I observe.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www4.itrc.hp.com/service/patch/patchDetail.do?patchid=PHSS_34085&amp;amp;sel={hpux:11.11,}&amp;amp;BC=main" target="_blank"&gt;http://www4.itrc.hp.com/service/patch/patchDetail.do?patchid=PHSS_34085&amp;amp;sel={hpux:11.11,}&amp;amp;BC=main&lt;/A&gt;|search|&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have applied the latest Support+ bundle on July 5th&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# swlist -l bundle -a install_date -a title GOLD\* HW\* OnlineDiag&lt;BR /&gt;# Initializing...&lt;BR /&gt;# Contacting target "gomera"...&lt;BR /&gt;#&lt;BR /&gt;# Target:  gomera:/&lt;BR /&gt;#&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  GOLDAPPS11i   200707050948.26 Applications Patches for HP-UX 11i v1, June 2007 &lt;BR /&gt;  GOLDBASE11i   200707050948.26 Base Patches for HP-UX 11i v1, June 2007 &lt;BR /&gt;  HWEnable11i   200707051008.59 Hardware Enablement Patches for HP-UX 11i v1, December 2006 &lt;BR /&gt;  OnlineDiag    200707051021.01 HPUX 11.11 Support Tools Bundle, June 2007 &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Could I have introduced a new bug with it?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 07:38:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051672#M304580</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ralph Grothe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-08T07:38:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Who is cluttering /var/tmp with char dev files rdskAAA* ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051673#M304581</link>
      <description>Use tusc  - &lt;A href="http://h21007.www2.hp.com/portal/site/dspp/PAGE.template/page.document?ciid=61086d6e1de021106d6e1de02110275d6e10RCRD" target="_blank"&gt;http://h21007.www2.hp.com/portal/site/dspp/PAGE.template/page.document?ciid=61086d6e1de021106d6e1de02110275d6e10RCRD&lt;/A&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;to see what is the exact process generating these files.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If this is the same (EMS) it's possible bug or misconfiguration due to removed hardware.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;regards,&lt;BR /&gt;ivan</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 08:27:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051673#M304581</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ivan Krastev</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-08T08:27:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Who is cluttering /var/tmp with char dev files rdskAAA* ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051674#M304582</link>
      <description>I've seen them on my 11.11 systems as well.  It would be nice to know what they are...</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 14:31:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051674#M304582</guid>
      <dc:creator>TwoProc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-08T14:31:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Who is cluttering /var/tmp with char dev files rdskAAA* ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051675#M304583</link>
      <description>Ralph,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would do 3 things first. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Stop and start STM a few times...and see if that clears it up.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# /sbin/init.d/diagnostic stop|start&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If that doesnt help, then reload STM to the latest version or fall back to the last good version you had before the current one.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Upgrade OnlineDiag to the latest version.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If that doesn't do it, then I think you need to call HP.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 14:52:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051675#M304583</guid>
      <dc:creator>Todd McDaniel_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-08T14:52:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Who is cluttering /var/tmp with char dev files rdskAAA* ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051676#M304584</link>
      <description>Shalom,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I think I recall NFS or Samba leaving files like this behind. I'd be leaning toward NFS.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Do they correspond with disk devices that are part of NFS shares?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:31:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051676#M304584</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-08T15:31:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Who is cluttering /var/tmp with char dev files rdskAAA* ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051677#M304585</link>
      <description>Re: NFS shares.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Those devices are not involved in NFS shares on my servers, especially the worst one, which isn't an NFS server at all.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 17:39:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051677#M304585</guid>
      <dc:creator>TwoProc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-08T17:39:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Who is cluttering /var/tmp with char dev files rdskAAA* ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051678#M304586</link>
      <description>The possiblity of a bug or re-introducation of previous bug couldn't be ruled out here. However I am curious to know what if you move /var/tmp/sysstat_em.fmt to somewhere else, would you get those rdskAAA* files created?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There was a known issue (JAGae59420)with sysstat_em earlier where sysstat_em should delete the /var/tmp/sysstat_em.fmt  file after event generation and it was fixed in the Dec'04 release.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 17:54:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051678#M304586</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sameer_Nirmal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-08T17:54:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Who is cluttering /var/tmp with char dev files rdskAAA* ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051679#M304587</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;Ivan,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am kind of despairing.&lt;BR /&gt;Whenever I issue an lsof on the directory /var/tmp (belongs to /var FS) I always get sysstat_em popping up as the only proc that has files open thereon.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# lsof +d /var/tmp &lt;BR /&gt;COMMAND    PID USER   FD   TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFF  NODE NAME&lt;BR /&gt;sysstat_e 5771 root    8w   REG 64,0x8        0 29107 /var/tmp/sysstat_em.fmt&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So I have been tusc-ing only open() and mknod() syscalls  by this PID (also for possible sysstat_em forked children), because I don't know of any other syscall that could create a new char device. &lt;BR /&gt;But all I can see is that this proc seems to  multiplex for pending input streams by a select() (probably on its listening socket),&lt;BR /&gt;then rereads its config file, then opens what looks like some lock file to me, and finaly opens its /dev/diag device, only to reenter the multiplex cycle.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# tusc -f -s open,mknod 5771&lt;BR /&gt;( Attached to process 5771 ("/usr/sbin/stm/uut/bin/tools/monitor/sysstat_em") [32-bit] )&lt;BR /&gt;select(2048, 0x77ff0cf4, 0x77ff0978, 0x77ff0a78, 0x77ff0f04) ............. [sleeping]&lt;BR /&gt;open("/var/stm/config/tools/monitor/sysstat_em.cfg", O_RDONLY, 0666) ..... = 7&lt;BR /&gt;open("/var/stm/data/.slicdata", O_RDWR, 0666) ............................ ERR#2 ENOENT&lt;BR /&gt;open("/dev/diag/diag2", O_RDONLY, 060100) ................................ = 9&lt;BR /&gt;select(2048, 0x77ff0cf4, 0x77ff0978, 0x77ff0a78, 0x77ff0f04) ............. [sleeping]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Please, could you tell how I can find out which process is creating these char devices?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Since yesterday over 3000 files have been created.&lt;BR /&gt;And they get created in rather short intervals as can be seen by this tail&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# ll -rt /var/tmp/rdskAAA*|tail &lt;BR /&gt;crw-------   1 root       root       203 0x001000 Aug  9 08:48 /var/tmp/rdskAAAa28188&lt;BR /&gt;crw-------   1 root       root       203 0x001000 Aug  9 08:48 /var/tmp/rdskAAAa28197&lt;BR /&gt;crw-------   1 root       root       203 0x001000 Aug  9 08:48 /var/tmp/rdskAAAa28210&lt;BR /&gt;crw-------   1 root       root       203 0x001000 Aug  9 08:48 /var/tmp/rdskAAAa28220&lt;BR /&gt;crw-------   1 root       root       203 0x001000 Aug  9 08:49 /var/tmp/rdskAAAa28233&lt;BR /&gt;crw-------   1 root       root       203 0x001000 Aug  9 08:49 /var/tmp/rdskAAAa28242&lt;BR /&gt;crw-------   1 root       root       203 0x001000 Aug  9 08:49 /var/tmp/rdskAAAa28260&lt;BR /&gt;crw-------   1 root       root       203 0x001000 Aug  9 08:50 /var/tmp/rdskAAAa28269&lt;BR /&gt;crw-------   1 root       root       203 0x001000 Aug  9 08:50 /var/tmp/rdskAAAa28282&lt;BR /&gt;crw-------   1 root       root       203 0x001000 Aug  9 08:50 /var/tmp/rdskAAAa28292&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP and John,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;as for NFS (you both mentioned it),&lt;BR /&gt;this box neither exports nor mounts NFS shares.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Todd, &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;in /etc/opt/resmon/lbin/monconfig&lt;BR /&gt;(gosh, who thought up this arcane path for a utility?)&lt;BR /&gt;I shutdown EMS, and I also stopped diagmond by its init script&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# /sbin/init.d/diagnostic stop;sleep 20;UNIX95= ps -C diagmond&lt;BR /&gt;  PID TTY          TIME CMD&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Well, at least for the last half an hour since I executed these commands, &lt;BR /&gt;no new device files have been created.&lt;BR /&gt;But as soon as I restarted the diagnostic init script 7 new files were created.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I also attached tusc for open and mknod calls to the pid of diagmond and children,&lt;BR /&gt;but couldn't see any opens on /var/tmp.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So it really looks as if some frenzied STM proc is causing them.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Because I hadn't observed this before I applied the DIAGNOSTICS patch of last Support+ CD release last month,&lt;BR /&gt;I now suspect this to have introduced this behavior.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 02:32:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051679#M304587</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ralph Grothe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-09T02:32:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Who is cluttering /var/tmp with char dev files rdskAAA* ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051680#M304588</link>
      <description>I have the same things, since 2002.  But only 20 or so, about every month or so.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;Sameer:  I am curious to know what if you move /var/tmp/sysstat_em.fmt&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I don't have that.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 02:39:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051680#M304588</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dennis Handly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-09T02:39:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Who is cluttering /var/tmp with char dev files rdskAAA* ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051681#M304589</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;Sameer,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I tentatively renamed systat_em.fmt&lt;BR /&gt;as you suggested.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# ps -fp $(fuser -u /var/tmp/sysstat_em.fmt 2&amp;gt;/dev/null)                   &lt;BR /&gt;     UID   PID  PPID  C    STIME TTY       TIME COMMAND&lt;BR /&gt;    root 29200     1  0 09:04:18 ?         0:00 /usr/sbin/stm/uut/bin/tools/monitor/sysstat_em&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# mv /var/tmp/sysstat_em.fmt /var/tmp/sysstat_em.fmt.moved&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;# ll /var/tmp/sysstat_em.fmt*                             &lt;BR /&gt;-rw-r--r--   1 root       root             0 Aug  9 09:25 /var/tmp/sysstat_em.fmt.moved&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But this doesn't work as long as the agent systat_em his holding it open&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# ps -fp $(fuser -u /var/tmp/sysstat_em.fmt.moved 2&amp;gt;/dev/null)&lt;BR /&gt;     UID   PID  PPID  C    STIME TTY       TIME COMMAND&lt;BR /&gt;    root 29200     1  0 09:04:18 ?         0:00 /usr/sbin/stm/uut/bin/tools/monitor/sysstat_em&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 02:43:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051681#M304589</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ralph Grothe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-09T02:43:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Who is cluttering /var/tmp with char dev files rdskAAA* ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051682#M304590</link>
      <description>Shalom Ralph,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I share your pain.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The bottom line here is the files are owned by  oracle and they should be cleaned up by the oracle application.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I fought with oracle to get them to do better testing on HP-UX after receiving an isntall script that didn't work on HP-UX that was clearly tested only on Solaris.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I was partially successful, because I refused to accept delivery on products not tested on HP-UX. Still, they leave messes and don't like to clean those messes up.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It's frustrating. I suggest making your unhappiness clear to your Oracle Rep the next time they ask for more money.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 03:06:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051682#M304590</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-09T03:06:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Who is cluttering /var/tmp with char dev files rdskAAA* ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051683#M304591</link>
      <description>&amp;gt;SEP: The bottom line here is the files are owned by oracle &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Are you confusing this thread with "0 byte files created in /tmp"?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1151735" target="_blank"&gt;http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1151735&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I don't have Oracle.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 03:27:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051683#M304591</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dennis Handly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-09T03:27:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Who is cluttering /var/tmp with char dev files rdskAAA* ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051684#M304592</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;Ralph,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I think you're looking at the wrong culprit here - I don't think there's a problem with sysstat_em at all.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I tried a quick experiment on my 11.11 system here which is also patched up to June 07. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My system is trusted, so I was able to enable the auditing subsystem and tune it to just look for mknod system calls.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Here's what I found:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~&lt;BR /&gt;070809 09:28:21  1632 S     14      1      0          0          0          0          0 ?????&lt;BR /&gt;[ Event=mknod; User=root; Real Grp=root; Eff.Grp=root;  ]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;     RETURN_VALUE 1 = 0;&lt;BR /&gt;     PARAM #1 (file path) = 0 (cnode);&lt;BR /&gt;                            0x40000008 (dev);&lt;BR /&gt;                            7 (inode);&lt;BR /&gt;              (path) = /var/tmp/rdskUAAa01632&lt;BR /&gt;     PARAM #2 (int) = 8576&lt;BR /&gt;     PARAM #3 (int) = -888971264&lt;BR /&gt;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~&lt;BR /&gt;070809 09:28:21  1632 S     14      1      0          0          0          0          0 ?????&lt;BR /&gt;[ Event=mknod; User=root; Real Grp=root; Eff.Grp=root;  ]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;     RETURN_VALUE 1 = 0;&lt;BR /&gt;     PARAM #1 (file path) = 0 (cnode);&lt;BR /&gt;                            0x40000008 (dev);&lt;BR /&gt;                            7 (inode);&lt;BR /&gt;              (path) = /var/tmp/rdskVAAa01632&lt;BR /&gt;     PARAM #2 (int) = 8576&lt;BR /&gt;     PARAM #3 (int) = -888971264&lt;BR /&gt;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~&lt;BR /&gt;# ps -ef | grep 1632&lt;BR /&gt;    root  1632     1  0 09:22:30 ?         0:00 /usr/sbin/stm/uut/bin/tools/monitor/disk_em&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;That looks pretty similar to what you are seeing. The difference is on my system these files are being cleanup up straight away:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# ll /var/tmp/*dsk*&lt;BR /&gt;/var/tmp/*dsk* not found&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So I would apply tusc to disc_em rather that sysstat_em&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Duncan</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 03:38:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051684#M304592</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duncan Edmonstone</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-09T03:38:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Who is cluttering /var/tmp with char dev files rdskAAA* ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051685#M304593</link>
      <description>... and looking at the files created, note that the end of the filename contains the PID of the process.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The fact that yours are incrementing whilst mine stays the same suggests that disk_em is in fact failing on your system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I believe it is supposed to log to the logfiles found in /var/opt/resmon/log, so take a look there.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Duncan</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 03:55:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051685#M304593</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duncan Edmonstone</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-09T03:55:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Who is cluttering /var/tmp with char dev files rdskAAA* ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051686#M304594</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;SEP and Dennis,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;never mind, this well could be an Oracle issue.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Normally, this box serves as a test bed for the Oracle DBAs and the application developers.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For some reason there is currently no DB instance online.&lt;BR /&gt;These are the only oracle procs right now&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# ps -u oracle&lt;BR /&gt;   PID TTY       TIME COMMAND&lt;BR /&gt;  2589 ?        23:44 perl&lt;BR /&gt;  2602 ?        60:53 emagent&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hm, being a bit of a Perl aficionado myself&lt;BR /&gt;that interests me, what they are running&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# UNIX95= ps -x -o args -p 2589&lt;BR /&gt;COMMAND&lt;BR /&gt;/app/oracle/grid/agent10g/perl/bin/perl /app/oracle/grid/agent10g/bin/emwd.pl agent /app/oracle/grid/agent10g/sysman/log/emagent.nohup&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So I looked at the agent Perl script which, according to its header, is an Oracle supplied piece, and was a bit shocked about lots of unperlish idioms or even deprecated Perl malpractices in the vein of "Pest Practices".&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;First thing that disqualifies it as production code for a piece that exceeds 100 lines (with crudely stripped comments)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# grep ^[^#] /app/oracle/grid/agent10g/bin/emwd.pl|wc -l&lt;BR /&gt;697&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Where, the hack is the strict pragma?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# grep -c strict /app/oracle/grid/agent10g/bin/emwd.pl      &lt;BR /&gt;0&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Lets pick up a few pest lines (prepended line Nos.).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What a misnomer for an array:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;     216 my @COMMAND_STR=@ARGV;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This is C style indenting, isn't it.&lt;BR /&gt;Ok, its just a matter of style:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;     228 if ($NOHUP_FILE eq "")&lt;BR /&gt;     229 {&lt;BR /&gt;     230   if($COMMAND eq "iasconsole")&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Bizarre quoting and concatting&lt;BR /&gt;(Mark Jason Dominus calls this "cave dwellers' Woodoo"):&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;     257 $reqPkg = "$moduleName"."\.pm";&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Useless use of parentheses and weird arithmetics:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;     315   my($NUM_COLS) = 2;&lt;BR /&gt;     316   my($NUM_COMPONENTS) = (scalar(@components)/$NUM_COLS); &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Clumsy initialization:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;     324   # marked all components as just started&lt;BR /&gt;     325   my @compJustStarted;&lt;BR /&gt;     326   for $i ( 0 .. ($NUM_COMPONENTS-1) ) &lt;BR /&gt;     327   {&lt;BR /&gt;     328     $compJustStarted[$i] = 1;&lt;BR /&gt;     329   }&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Again, ugly C style looping:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;    355     for($i=0, $baseCtr=0; $i &amp;lt; $NUM_COMPONENTS; $i++, $baseCtr+=2)&lt;BR /&gt;     356     { &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Unclear local scoping:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;     367       # Reap the child .... returns an array.&lt;BR /&gt;     368       # [0] : How the process exited [normal/signal/coredump].&lt;BR /&gt;     369       # [1] : Exit code/Signal Code&lt;BR /&gt;     370       local (*processExit) = reapChild( $pid, $name );&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;this is returned by reapChild():&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;    926         else &lt;BR /&gt;     927         {&lt;BR /&gt;     928           printDebugMessage("ProcessStatus is $processStatus. Assuming normal exit.");&lt;BR /&gt;     929           @status = ($PROCESS_EXIT_NORMAL, $processStatus);&lt;BR /&gt;     930         }&lt;BR /&gt;     931     }&lt;BR /&gt;     932     return (\@status);&lt;BR /&gt;     933   }&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Btw, in this sub we suddenly take up Perl style indenting (must be due to different coders):&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;     901     if($reaped == -1) {&lt;BR /&gt;     902         # we lost the xit code. somebody else reaped it.&lt;BR /&gt;     903         # we report normal exit as we don't want it restarted.&lt;BR /&gt;     904         printMessage("Lost xit code. Assuming normal exit. processStatus=$processStatus&lt;BR /&gt;     904 ");&lt;BR /&gt;     905         @status = ($PROCESS_EXIT_NORMAL, 0);&lt;BR /&gt;     906     } else {&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Strange logic, and again ample use of parens:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;     425       # If the status is no_process or process_hang ...&lt;BR /&gt;     426       if( ($rc == $STATUS_NO_SUCH_PROCESS) or&lt;BR /&gt;     427           ($rc == $STATUS_PROCESS_HANG) or &lt;BR /&gt;     428           ($rc == $STATUS_AGENT_ABNORMAL) or&lt;BR /&gt;     429           ( $processExit[0] != $PROCESS_OK ) )&lt;BR /&gt;     430       {&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;just few lines later unmotivated change to higher precedence operators:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;     434          if ( ($processExit[0] == $PROCESS_OK) &amp;amp;&amp;amp;&lt;BR /&gt;     435               ( $rc == $STATUS_PROCESS_HANG ) || ( $rc == $STATUS_AGENT_ABNORMAL ) )&lt;BR /&gt;     436          {&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Strange typeglob assignment of our ubiquitious reapChild sub, which merely returns an array ref: &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;     464                (*processExit) = reapChild( $pid, $name );&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Again funny concatination (first by operator, later by double quotes interpolation):&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;    491             my($tmpMsg) = $name." exited at ".localtime($currentCrashTime).&lt;BR /&gt;     492                           " with return value $processExit[1].";&lt;BR /&gt;     493             printMessage($tmpMsg);&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;while here we relapse to a more palatable and readbable interpolation:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;    669              writeToEMAbbendFile("$EMHOME/sysman/log/agabend.log", &lt;BR /&gt;     670                                   "$message");&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hard to read and obsolete sub dereferncing of array elem:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;     701           $tmp = &amp;amp;{$components[$baseCtr+$restart_offset]}();&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Clumsy logic:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;     750     if($NUM_COMPONENTS == 0)&lt;BR /&gt;     751     {&lt;BR /&gt;     752       if($normalShutdown eq "FALSE")&lt;BR /&gt;     753       {&lt;BR /&gt;     754         printMessage("Exited due to Thrash.");&lt;BR /&gt;     755       }&lt;BR /&gt;     756     }&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Why not better use sprintf or join?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;     798         my($appender) = $name."_".time();&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Repitiion of queer assignments:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# grep -n '@status = ($PROCESS_OK, $PROCESS_OK);' /app/oracle/grid/agent10g/bin/emwd.pl&lt;BR /&gt;880:    @status = ($PROCESS_OK, $PROCESS_OK);      &lt;BR /&gt;894:    @status = ($PROCESS_OK, $PROCESS_OK);&lt;BR /&gt;954:    @status = ($PROCESS_OK, $PROCESS_OK);      &lt;BR /&gt;970:       @status = ($PROCESS_OK, $PROCESS_OK);&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Well, this goes on and on.&lt;BR /&gt;I only had a very superficial look at it without caring at all about the program logic or trying to understand the code.&lt;BR /&gt;Maybe I have disparaged indisputable bits?&lt;BR /&gt;And altogether this code still is quite acceptable and not as bad as other vendor distributed I have seen (have a look at VCS entrypoints).&lt;BR /&gt;But if even a Perl rookie like me notices this then I wonder of what quality the code might be that they provide us only as binaries?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 04:54:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051686#M304594</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ralph Grothe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-09T04:54:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Who is cluttering /var/tmp with char dev files rdskAAA* ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051687#M304595</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;Sorry for my ranting digression.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Duncan,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;many thanks for pointing me to disk_em.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Well, as I think I have told, I already looked at the logs in /var/opt/resmon/log.&lt;BR /&gt;The only current one is event.log (the other files date back to April), and all entries later than July 5th (when the box was last rebooted due to Support+ patching) only inform about a restart of EMS today, which took place as I stopped it via monconfig.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I also noticed the trailing PIDs in the device files' names.&lt;BR /&gt;But these PIDs are all of processes in the past.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Actually, disk_em wasn't in the proc table while EMS was shut down by my monconfig intervention.&lt;BR /&gt;But yet, the device files were created as soon as diagmond was running.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I now restarted EMS via monconfig and attached another tusc to disk_em.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I think it is waiting for the master agent to fetch states because it lingers in a select call.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# UNIX95= ps -C disk_em&lt;BR /&gt;  PID TTY          TIME CMD&lt;BR /&gt; 7425 ?           00:01 disk_em&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;# tusc -f -s open,mknod 7425&lt;BR /&gt;( Attached to process 7425 ("/usr/sbin/stm/uut/bin/tools/monitor/disk_em") [32-bit] )&lt;BR /&gt;select(2048, 0x77ff0b24, 0x77ff07a8, 0x77ff08a8, 0x77ff0d34) ............. [sleeping]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I will have to watch this for half an hour and come back.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 05:13:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051687#M304595</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ralph Grothe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-09T05:13:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Who is cluttering /var/tmp with char dev files rdskAAA* ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051688#M304596</link>
      <description>Ralph,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Being an impatient type, I wasn't willing to wait for disk_em to do this itself, so I tried to force it. I found stopping/starting diagnostics caused disk_em to start running those mknods:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;/sbin/init.d/diagnostic stop&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;... wait for a minute...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;/sbin/init.d/diagnostic start&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Duncan&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 05:26:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051688#M304596</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duncan Edmonstone</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-09T05:26:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Who is cluttering /var/tmp with char dev files rdskAAA* ?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051689#M304597</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;Yes, that's what I also observed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# /sbin/init.d/diagnostic stop&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;# UNIX95= ps -C diagmond&lt;BR /&gt;  PID TTY          TIME CMD&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But running it directly through tusc rather than attaching to diagmond it aborts.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# tusc -f -s open,mknod /sbin/init.d/diagnostic start 2&amp;gt;&amp;amp;1|grep /var/tmp&lt;BR /&gt;open("/var/tmp/aaaa09909", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC|O_LARGEFILE, 0666) ....... = 3&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# UNIX95= ps -C diagmond                                                &lt;BR /&gt;  PID TTY          TIME CMD&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But diagmond is really the culprit, as can be seen this way:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# /sbin/init.d/diagnostic start &amp;amp;&amp;amp; sleep 10 &amp;amp;&amp;amp; tusc -f -s open,mknod $(UNIX95= ps -C diagmond -o pid=) 2&amp;gt;&amp;amp;1|grep /var/tmp                        &amp;lt;&lt;BR /&gt;mknod("/var/tmp/rdskAAAa11454", S_IFCHR|0600, 3405848576) .................... = 0&lt;BR /&gt;open("/var/tmp/rdskAAAa11454", O_RDONLY, 014644) ............................. = 5&lt;BR /&gt;open("/var/tmp/rdskAAAa11454", O_RDWR, 0160100) .............................. = 6&lt;BR /&gt;mknod("/var/tmp/rdskAAAa11480", S_IFCHR|0600, 3405905920) .................... = 0&lt;BR /&gt;open("/var/tmp/rdskAAAa11480", O_RDONLY, 014644) ............................. = 5&lt;BR /&gt;open("/var/tmp/rdskAAAa11480", O_RDWR, 0170100) .............................. = 6&lt;BR /&gt;mknod("/var/tmp/rdskAAAa11486", S_IFCHR|0600, 3405914112) .................... = 0&lt;BR /&gt;open("/var/tmp/rdskAAAa11486", O_RDONLY, 014644) ............................. = 5&lt;BR /&gt;open("/var/tmp/rdskAAAa11486", O_RDWR, 0170100) .............................. = 6&lt;BR /&gt;open("/var/tmp/CCLOGD_TEST_DATA", O_RDONLY, 032) ............................. ERR#2 ENOENT&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Ok, now how can this be fixed?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Do you think this is HP SW call worthy?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 05:48:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/who-is-cluttering-var-tmp-with-char-dev-files-rdskaaa/m-p/4051689#M304597</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ralph Grothe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-09T05:48:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

