<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ipcs -m in rx8640 11.23 server in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ipcs-m-in-rx8640-11-23-server/m-p/4062846#M306170</link>
    <description>Thanks to all.&lt;BR /&gt;Nextime i encountered the problem, i will issue the ipcs -ma.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks!</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 05:00:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jojo Castro</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-08-30T05:00:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ipcs -m in rx8640 11.23 server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ipcs-m-in-rx8640-11-23-server/m-p/4062839#M306163</link>
      <description>Hi All...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have a clustered server (separate servers) running in 11.23 as OS SFRAC 4.1 oracle10g. My database administrators and developers just reported me the high memory utilization 80% on node1 and 75% on node2. After they have killed applications and shutted down oracle, node2 memory utilization dropped to 20%. But in node1, it still as high as 67%. I have run kmeminfo and the output in both nodes are almost the same. But the ipcs -m command shows that the shared memory segments that root has been eating up in node1 is high than that of node2. Please see the outputs below:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;NODE1:&lt;BR /&gt;# cat ipcs.txt&lt;BR /&gt;IPC status from /dev/kmem as of Thu Aug 30 14:24:06 2007&lt;BR /&gt;T         ID     KEY        MODE        OWNER     GROUP&lt;BR /&gt;Shared Memory:&lt;BR /&gt;m          0 0x411c07db --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m          1 0x4e0c0002 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m          2 0x41208954 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m          3 0x00a5c581 --rw-------     sfmdb     users&lt;BR /&gt;m      65540 0x06347849 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m     131077 0x0c6629c9 --rw-r-----      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m          7 0x49180468 --rw-r--r--      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m    4718603 0x4d4e5251 --rw-r--r--      root       sys&lt;BR /&gt;m     458764 0x55315352 --rw-rw-rw-      root       sys&lt;BR /&gt;m     458765 0x44525354 --rw-r--r--      root       sys&lt;BR /&gt;m     458766 0x53494152 --rw-r--r--      root       sys&lt;BR /&gt;m     262159 0x00005643 --rw-rw-rw-      root       sys&lt;BR /&gt;m     262160 0x00005654 --rw-rw-rw-      root       sys&lt;BR /&gt;m      65553 0x0000cace --rw-rw-rw-      root       sys&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;NODE2:&lt;BR /&gt;$ cat ipcs.txt&lt;BR /&gt;IPC status from /dev/kmem as of Thu Aug 30 14:24:34 2007&lt;BR /&gt;T         ID     KEY        MODE        OWNER     GROUP&lt;BR /&gt;Shared Memory:&lt;BR /&gt;m          0 0x411c07db --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m          1 0x4e0c0002 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m          2 0x412089cc --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m          3 0x00a5c581 --rw-------     sfmdb     users&lt;BR /&gt;m     196612 0x0c6629c9 --rw-r-----      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m          5 0x06347849 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m      32774 0x49180468 --rw-r--r--      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m     458763 0x4d4e5251 --rw-r--r--      root       sys&lt;BR /&gt;m     360460 0x55315352 --rw-rw-rw-      root       sys&lt;BR /&gt;m     360461 0x44525354 --rw-r--r--      root       sys&lt;BR /&gt;m     360462 0x53494152 --rw-r--r--      root       sys&lt;BR /&gt;m     196623 0x00005643 --rw-rw-rw-      root       sys&lt;BR /&gt;m     196624 0x00005654 --rw-rw-rw-      root       sys&lt;BR /&gt;m      98321 0x0000cace --rw-rw-rw-      root       sys&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For your expertise, can you please help me how to explain these? Is there a possibilities that i can point what particular process consume share memory segments?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Since I don't know what to kill, I just decided to reboot the systems since we are still in POC. Memory utilization is now normal.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks in advance.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 02:33:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ipcs-m-in-rx8640-11-23-server/m-p/4062839#M306163</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jojo Castro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-30T02:33:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ipcs -m in rx8640 11.23 server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ipcs-m-in-rx8640-11-23-server/m-p/4062840#M306164</link>
      <description>Since all shared memory segments are owned by root, it's hard to tell what to do. Certainly because both servers show the same. That makes me think you don't have a shared-memory issue, but something els.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you ever encounter the same issue, run ipcs -ma. The "a"-option will show more details about memory segment sizes and connected processes.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Further, there is a tool called "kmeminfo". It's not standard on your system, but you can get it through HP support (or maybe a download on the internet somewhere). With this tool, you can better see where the exessive memory usage is going to (buffer cache, private segments, kernel memory, shared segments, ...)</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 03:18:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ipcs-m-in-rx8640-11-23-server/m-p/4062840#M306164</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wim Rombauts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-30T03:18:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ipcs -m in rx8640 11.23 server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ipcs-m-in-rx8640-11-23-server/m-p/4062841#M306165</link>
      <description>Wim Rombauts   Aug 30, 2007 08:18:49 GMT  5 pts   &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;--------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;Since all shared memory segments are owned by root, it's hard to tell what to do. Certainly because both servers show the same. That makes me think you don't have a shared-memory issue, but something els.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you ever encounter the same issue, run ipcs -ma. The "a"-option will show more details about memory segment sizes and connected processes.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Further, there is a tool called "kmeminfo". It's not standard on your system, but you can get it through HP support (or maybe a download on the internet somewhere). With this tool, you can better see where the exessive memory usage is going to (buffer cache, private segments, kernel memory, shared segments, ...) &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for the answer Wim.&lt;BR /&gt;Actually, as stated in my mail, I used kmeminfo and the output on both nodes is just the same in terms of memory, rss utilization. Both servers dont show the same.&lt;BR /&gt;Please see the ipcs output of node1 and this is what i suspected.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;m 4718603 0x4d4e5251 --rw-r--r-- root sys&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 03:28:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ipcs-m-in-rx8640-11-23-server/m-p/4062841#M306165</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jojo Castro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-30T03:28:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ipcs -m in rx8640 11.23 server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ipcs-m-in-rx8640-11-23-server/m-p/4062842#M306166</link>
      <description>As Wim said, we don't want to see any ipcs -m output unless you use -ma.  Besides giving the important size, has other useful info.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And while you are at it, provide "swapinfo -tam".&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You say the kmeminfo output is almost the same, what percent of the output is the same?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 03:36:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ipcs-m-in-rx8640-11-23-server/m-p/4062842#M306166</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dennis Handly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-30T03:36:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ipcs -m in rx8640 11.23 server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ipcs-m-in-rx8640-11-23-server/m-p/4062843#M306167</link>
      <description>Please see attached kmeminfo output.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 03:41:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ipcs-m-in-rx8640-11-23-server/m-p/4062843#M306167</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jojo Castro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-30T03:41:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ipcs -m in rx8640 11.23 server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ipcs-m-in-rx8640-11-23-server/m-p/4062844#M306168</link>
      <description>&amp;gt;Please see attached kmeminfo output.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Your total physical size is close.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But would about kernel tunables for the disk cache? dbc_max_pct(5) dbc_min_pct(5)</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 04:09:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ipcs-m-in-rx8640-11-23-server/m-p/4062844#M306168</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dennis Handly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-30T04:09:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ipcs -m in rx8640 11.23 server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ipcs-m-in-rx8640-11-23-server/m-p/4062845#M306169</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Please note that in the row you suspect:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;m 4718603 0x4d4e5251 --rw-r--r-- root sys&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The value 4718603 is NOT a size, it's a shared memory ID.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As already noted, you need to run ipcs -ma to see the size of these areas. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Duncan&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 04:10:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ipcs-m-in-rx8640-11-23-server/m-p/4062845#M306169</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duncan Edmonstone</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-30T04:10:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ipcs -m in rx8640 11.23 server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ipcs-m-in-rx8640-11-23-server/m-p/4062846#M306170</link>
      <description>Thanks to all.&lt;BR /&gt;Nextime i encountered the problem, i will issue the ipcs -ma.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 05:00:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ipcs-m-in-rx8640-11-23-server/m-p/4062846#M306170</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jojo Castro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-08-30T05:00:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

