<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: BIND v4.9.7 (PHNE_20618) in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/bind-v4-9-7-phne-20618/m-p/2431085#M3070</link>
    <description>I had the same problem with _, but I banned them from hostnames. Took care of that issue. The named would not load a zone that had _ in the name, you would get an error on the zone.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The script that I am referring to is the hosts_to_named. I ran sdiff on it and the older version and found the difference. They added a routine called getip() that verifies that the IP address octets are between 0 and 255 inclusive (in case an address is typo'd). It creates a file, the cat's it through this awk routine. I went back to using the previous version of the script and it runs in about 5 minutes, instead of 2 hours. I just make sure that I don't type an IP address!!!  :-) Not worth the extra 1 hr 55 minutes of runtime.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2000 21:08:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Brian Pedersen_1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2000-07-19T21:08:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BIND v4.9.7 (PHNE_20618)</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/bind-v4-9-7-phne-20618/m-p/2431081#M3066</link>
      <description>I have installed the PHNE_20618 patch on a 10.20 system. The hosts_to_named script used to take about 5 minutes to run with approx. 27 domains in authority. Now that I installed the patch, the script takes about 2 hours to run. Why????</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2000 11:50:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/bind-v4-9-7-phne-20618/m-p/2431081#M3066</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brian Pedersen_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-07-17T11:50:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BIND v4.9.7 (PHNE_20618)</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/bind-v4-9-7-phne-20618/m-p/2431082#M3067</link>
      <description>Brian,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Swremove the patch. Read the text, and see if it is applicable to you environment and make changes if necessay, before reinstalling the patch.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2000 12:58:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/bind-v4-9-7-phne-20618/m-p/2431082#M3067</guid>
      <dc:creator>CHRIS_ANORUO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-07-17T12:58:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BIND v4.9.7 (PHNE_20618)</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/bind-v4-9-7-phne-20618/m-p/2431083#M3068</link>
      <description>I had read the text. The section that was applicable was:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Defect Description:&lt;BR /&gt;        PHNE_20618:&lt;BR /&gt;        1. JAGac40451 / SR8606125060:&lt;BR /&gt;           Boundary conditions are not handled properly.&lt;BR /&gt;        Resolution:&lt;BR /&gt;           The boundary conditions have been addressed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;        2. JAGaa57264 / SR5003446138:&lt;BR /&gt;           BIND 4.9.7 running as internal nameserver&lt;BR /&gt;           and forwarding  queries to external nameserver&lt;BR /&gt;           fails when the lookup address has a  CNAME&lt;BR /&gt;           record with a higher TTL than its corresponding&lt;BR /&gt;           A record.&lt;BR /&gt;        Resolution:&lt;BR /&gt;           The query packet header was not properly framed.&lt;BR /&gt;           Now a proper  header is sent in the query packet.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This was happening with queries to the internet to sites like yahoo.com and cnn.com that use round-robin responses. Once I installed the patch, these sites were accessible on a reliable basis again. Now it's just the hosts_to_named script that's misbehaving.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I DO know better than to blindly apply patches.. Been burned before!!  :-)&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2000 13:51:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/bind-v4-9-7-phne-20618/m-p/2431083#M3068</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brian Pedersen_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-07-17T13:51:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BIND v4.9.7 (PHNE_20618)</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/bind-v4-9-7-phne-20618/m-p/2431084#M3069</link>
      <description>Brian&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   I don't know if this is applicable or not but I installed the patch to to my test system,  I have a script that runs the host_to_named conversion and at the end restart named, the problem I had was in the restart of named that was takeing a long time due to the fact that the bin 4.9.7 doesn't like host names with "_" in them. I had to add to my named.boot file a ignore statement to get over these errors.  Hope this helps&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Donald Branch&lt;BR /&gt;IBJ&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2000 20:33:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/bind-v4-9-7-phne-20618/m-p/2431084#M3069</guid>
      <dc:creator>Donald Branch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-07-19T20:33:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BIND v4.9.7 (PHNE_20618)</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/bind-v4-9-7-phne-20618/m-p/2431085#M3070</link>
      <description>I had the same problem with _, but I banned them from hostnames. Took care of that issue. The named would not load a zone that had _ in the name, you would get an error on the zone.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The script that I am referring to is the hosts_to_named. I ran sdiff on it and the older version and found the difference. They added a routine called getip() that verifies that the IP address octets are between 0 and 255 inclusive (in case an address is typo'd). It creates a file, the cat's it through this awk routine. I went back to using the previous version of the script and it runs in about 5 minutes, instead of 2 hours. I just make sure that I don't type an IP address!!!  :-) Not worth the extra 1 hr 55 minutes of runtime.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2000 21:08:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/bind-v4-9-7-phne-20618/m-p/2431085#M3070</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brian Pedersen_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-07-19T21:08:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

