<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: File system performance issues in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/file-system-performance-issues/m-p/4087861#M309941</link>
    <description>Chris,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; Are you running on 11.23 on online JFS ?&lt;BR /&gt;i suspected you need to tune your JFS using vxtunesfs parameter, as there are few known issue reported&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;WK&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:12:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>whiteknight</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-10-18T02:12:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>File system performance issues</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/file-system-performance-issues/m-p/4087859#M309939</link>
      <description>I have been trying to track down a problem which has been causing backups to run extremely slow. I believe I have found the bottleneck to be file system related. Here is a little background on the issue.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have an ESL712 tape library with ten LTO3 drives. I have this connected to two brocade fibre switches which are then connected and zoned to several machines. My backups are currently running at around 5~10MB/sec.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have discovered in my testing that I can't read my vxfs file systems any faster than 5~10MB/sec. I validated this using tar, dd and /dev/null. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Client:&lt;BR /&gt;bash-3.2# du -sk /opt&lt;BR /&gt;2727496 /opt&lt;BR /&gt;bash-3.2# time tar cf /dev/null /opt&lt;BR /&gt;real    12m39.753s&lt;BR /&gt;user    0m25.480s&lt;BR /&gt;sys     0m42.110s&lt;BR /&gt;3.5MB/sec&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Backup Server:&lt;BR /&gt;bash-3.2# du -sk /home&lt;BR /&gt;807938  /home&lt;BR /&gt;bash-3.2# time tar cf /dev/null /home&lt;BR /&gt;real    1m13.610s&lt;BR /&gt;user    0m9.320s&lt;BR /&gt;sys     0m13.820s&lt;BR /&gt;10MB/sec&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In addition to my file system backups running slow all of my Oracle RMAN backups run slow as well.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The disks we are reading from are on an XP512. I am aware that there are probably quite a few things that could be causing these issues. I have a case open with HP support as well. Hopefully I can get to the bottom of this start making good use of these LTO3 drives.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:34:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/file-system-performance-issues/m-p/4087859#M309939</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris Naudé</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-17T18:34:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: File system performance issues</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/file-system-performance-issues/m-p/4087860#M309940</link>
      <description>You are starting your tests at much too high a level of abstraction. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would start by umounting the filesystem and doing a test of the underlying disks or LUN's.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;e.g.&lt;BR /&gt;First test the raw (character) device:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;timex dd if=/dev/rdsk/c5t1d2 bs=1024k count=1000 of=/dev/null&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Next test the buffer cache:&lt;BR /&gt;timex dd if=/dev/dsk/c5t1d2 bs=1024k count=1000 of=/dev/null&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Now repeat the tests at the LVM or VxVM level:&lt;BR /&gt;timex dd if=/dev/vg05/rlvol1 bs=1024k count=1000 of=/dev/null&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;timex dd if=/dev/vg05/lvol1 bs=1024k count=1000 of=/dev/null&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Finally remount the file and repeat for a cooked 1GiB file:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;timex dd if=/aaa/bbb/My1GiBFile bs=1024k count=1000 of=/dev/null&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would repeat the tests a number of times and repeated tests of the block devices should show buffer cache improvements.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This will help pinpoint where in the chain the problem actually lies.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 22:04:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/file-system-performance-issues/m-p/4087860#M309940</guid>
      <dc:creator>A. Clay Stephenson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-17T22:04:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: File system performance issues</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/file-system-performance-issues/m-p/4087861#M309941</link>
      <description>Chris,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; Are you running on 11.23 on online JFS ?&lt;BR /&gt;i suspected you need to tune your JFS using vxtunesfs parameter, as there are few known issue reported&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;WK&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:12:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/file-system-performance-issues/m-p/4087861#M309941</guid>
      <dc:creator>whiteknight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-18T02:12:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

