<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: RAID1 for OS, RAID5 for the rest?  Or, RAID5 for all? in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/raid1-for-os-raid5-for-the-rest-or-raid5-for-all/m-p/4113664#M313710</link>
    <description>hi Mark!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This would have been my preferences:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1. Define RAID1 using sufficient disks that would cater for the OS and the area where i would be installing the Oracle software.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2. use the rest for defining my ASM area that would be used for my Oracle Database.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As you must already know ASM is just like raid 10 in effect -- done at the extent level of database segments instead of some &lt;BR /&gt;os stripe size.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This is the most simple and clean setup i can think of.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Beware however about performance - with one RAID controller... You only can compare you previous system performance and what you are looking forward to.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you need any further assistance, please do let us know.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Good luck!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;kind regards&lt;BR /&gt;yogeeraj&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 05:44:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Yogeeraj_1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-12-08T05:44:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RAID1 for OS, RAID5 for the rest?  Or, RAID5 for all?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/raid1-for-os-raid5-for-the-rest-or-raid5-for-all/m-p/4113663#M313709</link>
      <description>I'm configuring a new rx6600 as an Oracle DB server with 16 internal drives using the P400 HP Smart Array RAID controller.  My first thought is to create two RAID sets: use the first 2 drives and mirror them with RAID1 and use this for /vg00.  Then I'd configure the other 14 drives into a big RAID5 with a couple of spares and put everything else on that.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However, since I'm going through the same RAID controller would it actually be better to just build one big RAID5 using all 16 disks and put everything, including /vg00 on that?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any input would be appreciated.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Mark</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:56:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/raid1-for-os-raid5-for-the-rest-or-raid5-for-all/m-p/4113663#M313709</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Tunnell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-07T22:56:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RAID1 for OS, RAID5 for the rest?  Or, RAID5 for all?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/raid1-for-os-raid5-for-the-rest-or-raid5-for-all/m-p/4113664#M313710</link>
      <description>hi Mark!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This would have been my preferences:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1. Define RAID1 using sufficient disks that would cater for the OS and the area where i would be installing the Oracle software.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2. use the rest for defining my ASM area that would be used for my Oracle Database.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As you must already know ASM is just like raid 10 in effect -- done at the extent level of database segments instead of some &lt;BR /&gt;os stripe size.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This is the most simple and clean setup i can think of.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Beware however about performance - with one RAID controller... You only can compare you previous system performance and what you are looking forward to.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you need any further assistance, please do let us know.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Good luck!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;kind regards&lt;BR /&gt;yogeeraj&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 05:44:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/raid1-for-os-raid5-for-the-rest-or-raid5-for-all/m-p/4113664#M313710</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yogeeraj_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-08T05:44:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RAID1 for OS, RAID5 for the rest?  Or, RAID5 for all?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/raid1-for-os-raid5-for-the-rest-or-raid5-for-all/m-p/4113665#M313711</link>
      <description>hi Mark!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This would have been my preferences:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1. Define RAID1 using sufficient disks that would cater for the OS and the area where i would be installing the Oracle software.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2. use the rest for defining my ASM area that would be used for my Oracle Database.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As you must already know - ASM is just like raid 10 in effect -- done at the extent level of database segments instead of some &lt;BR /&gt;os stripe size.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This is the most simple and clean setup i can think of.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Beware however about performance - with one RAID controller... You only can compare you previous system performance and what you are looking forward to.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you need any further assistance, please do let us know.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Good luck!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;kind regards&lt;BR /&gt;yogeeraj&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 05:44:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/raid1-for-os-raid5-for-the-rest-or-raid5-for-all/m-p/4113665#M313711</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yogeeraj_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-08T05:44:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RAID1 for OS, RAID5 for the rest?  Or, RAID5 for all?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/raid1-for-os-raid5-for-the-rest-or-raid5-for-all/m-p/4113666#M313712</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Actually the thing is that, it is recommended to install OS in RAID 1.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Compare to RAID 1, 5  RAID 0 is more faster.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For other application installations you can use RAID 5.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But if you want faster speed for bettr performance, better use RAID10</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 18:45:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/raid1-for-os-raid5-for-the-rest-or-raid5-for-all/m-p/4113666#M313712</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jeeshan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-09T18:45:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

