<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: CPU usage in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-usage/m-p/4119264#M314529</link>
    <description>&amp;gt;TwoProc: providing you didn't run out of memory, you should run 4x faster.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Even if you didn't run out of memory, any memory or cache access in different processes could slow the others down some.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 06:53:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dennis Handly</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-12-20T06:53:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CPU usage</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-usage/m-p/4119259#M314524</link>
      <description>We are using rp8420 with 4 CPU's.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I need some help in interpreting the CPU performance.  Can we say that the system is 4 times powerful because 0f 4 CPU's versus one?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For example:  if one processor system mcan process 100 trnsaction then 4 processor can process 400 transcation.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Please excuse me if my question is not clear.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:54:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-usage/m-p/4119259#M314524</guid>
      <dc:creator>sheevm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-19T21:54:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU usage</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-usage/m-p/4119260#M314525</link>
      <description>hi kesh ,&lt;BR /&gt;if your application is a multithreaded app then we can 4 cpu machine is powerfull than 1 cpu machine. but if your application single thread app then we cannpt say it. it is a bit diffucult to say 4times faster .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hasan.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:58:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-usage/m-p/4119260#M314525</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hasan  Atasoy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-19T21:58:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU usage</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-usage/m-p/4119261#M314526</link>
      <description>&amp;gt;For example: if one processor system mcan process 100 trnsaction then 4 &amp;gt;processor can process 400 transcation.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;No the scale-up is not linear owing to synchronization and coherency issues.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:58:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-usage/m-p/4119261#M314526</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sandman!</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-19T21:58:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU usage</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-usage/m-p/4119262#M314527</link>
      <description>In general 4 is 4 times 1.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;but........&lt;BR /&gt;In reality not all servers, OSs and software applications scale 1 for 1 with CPU additions, but this typically only applies to over 8,12,16,32,64 or more CPUs.  Check the latest TPC benchmarks on the WWW.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also, if your application is single threaded then it will only be able to use 1 CPU at a time anyway and all the other CPUs do is to allow other processes CPU time.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:01:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-usage/m-p/4119262#M314527</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tim Nelson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-19T22:01:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU usage</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-usage/m-p/4119263#M314528</link>
      <description>Well, like most things, it depends.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would say yes, for a purely cpu intensive process.  However, almost no-one has such a thing, most people run business apps, which bring up and down memory resources, disk resources, network resources, etc.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;An example of a purely cpu intensive process would be calculating pi.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So, if you added 4 processors would you calculate pi 4x faster?  No, unless you were running a multiprocessing pi calculation engine which would use more threads to work.  If you did have a multiprocessing pi calculator, then yes, providing you didn't run out of memory, you should run 4x faster.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Or, if you ran 4 separate pi calculators simultaneously, then you'd probably run roughly 4x faster on a 4 processor system than on a 1 processor system (disregarding system processing time).</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:26:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-usage/m-p/4119263#M314528</guid>
      <dc:creator>TwoProc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-19T22:26:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CPU usage</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-usage/m-p/4119264#M314529</link>
      <description>&amp;gt;TwoProc: providing you didn't run out of memory, you should run 4x faster.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Even if you didn't run out of memory, any memory or cache access in different processes could slow the others down some.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 06:53:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/cpu-usage/m-p/4119264#M314529</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dennis Handly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-20T06:53:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

