<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: regarding rcp/ftp processes in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-rcp-ftp-processes/m-p/4126257#M315560</link>
    <description>Two more things:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;a) What do the following command show:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;lanadmin -x 0&lt;BR /&gt;lanadmin -x 4&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;b) Network statistics:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;netstat -i&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;VK2COT</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 10:31:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>VK2COT</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-01-09T10:31:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>regarding rcp/ftp processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-rcp-ftp-processes/m-p/4126253#M315556</link>
      <description>hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i have few questions regarding rcp/ftp processes.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i have a processes that try to do a 3-4 ftp/rcp from a remote server which has a 3.9 mb transfer sec, but when the ftp is increasing upto 10 ftp/rcp processes my rate was drastically change to 1mb transfer rate per sec. my question are: &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Does two many ftp/rcp processes affect my available NIC?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have a 2 active nic (lan0 and lan4), how can i maximize the use of the two nic? or is there a way on how can i choose which nic my ftp/rcp processes will pass thru?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;upon my checking lan0 has the most I/O usage.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks in advance.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:08:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-rcp-ftp-processes/m-p/4126253#M315556</guid>
      <dc:creator>remer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-09T00:08:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: regarding rcp/ftp processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-rcp-ftp-processes/m-p/4126254#M315557</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;a) Firstly, it seems you are running on&lt;BR /&gt;100Mbs LAN. If so, then throughput of&lt;BR /&gt;3.9 MBs is still relatively poor.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You should check both servers (remote and local).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For example, for HP-UX server, does the &lt;BR /&gt;following command report any errors:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;netstat -i&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;b) verify that the LAN switches and&lt;BR /&gt;cards on the server side are set to&lt;BR /&gt;the same type of operation. For example,&lt;BR /&gt;100Mbs, duplex, autonegotiate)...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;c) If you really want to increase network&lt;BR /&gt;throughput through a given IP address, the&lt;BR /&gt;HP-UX has Auto Port Aggregation (APA). APA&lt;BR /&gt;combines several physical NIC ports into&lt;BR /&gt;one logical IP connection.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It also allows a physical port, cable, or&lt;BR /&gt;switch port, to fail without losing the&lt;BR /&gt;connection. APA is not supported on all&lt;BR /&gt;Ethernet switches!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Finally, APA is a licensed product and&lt;BR /&gt;comes with a price tag but it is very&lt;BR /&gt;powerful and robust.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;d) You did not specify if your two active&lt;BR /&gt;NICs reside on the same subnet (that would not be an officially approved solution if&lt;BR /&gt;APA is not used).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If those two NICs are on different subnets,&lt;BR /&gt;and you want to use them without any&lt;BR /&gt;fancy software, then simply set your&lt;BR /&gt;FTP and RCP commands to connect to &lt;BR /&gt;remote servers by pointing to different&lt;BR /&gt;IP addresses on the remote server.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;VK2COT</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 06:02:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-rcp-ftp-processes/m-p/4126254#M315557</guid>
      <dc:creator>VK2COT</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-09T06:02:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: regarding rcp/ftp processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-rcp-ftp-processes/m-p/4126255#M315558</link>
      <description>here are the config of the 2 nic:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Class     I  H/W Path   Driver S/W State   H/W Type     Description&lt;BR /&gt;====================================================================&lt;BR /&gt;lan       0  0/0/0/1/0  igelan CLAIMED     INTERFACE    HP A7109-60001 PCI 1000Base-T Core&lt;BR /&gt;lan       4  1/0/4/1/0  igelan CLAIMED     INTERFACE    HP A6825-60101 PCI 1000Base-T Adapter&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Interval:      1                                       NETWORK BY INTERFACE     &lt;BR /&gt;               Network    In Packet      Out Packet       In KB        Out KB&lt;BR /&gt;Idx Interface   Type        Rate            Rate          Rate          Rate&lt;BR /&gt;--------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;  1 lan0       Lan     4602.0/4602.0   432.0/  432.0 6780.0/6780.0   26.0/  26.0&lt;BR /&gt;  2 lan3       Lan        0.0/   0.0     0.0/    0.0    0.0/   0.0    0.0/   0.0&lt;BR /&gt;  3 lan4       Lan        3.0/   3.0     0.0/    0.0    0.0/   0.0    0.0/   0.0&lt;BR /&gt;  4 lan5       Lan        0.0/   0.0     0.0/    0.0    0.0/   0.0    0.0/   0.0&lt;BR /&gt;  5 lan1       Lan        4.0/   4.0     4.0/    4.0    0.0/   0.0    0.0/   0.0&lt;BR /&gt;  6 lan2       Lan        2.0/   2.0     2.0/    2.0    0.0/   0.0    0.0/   0.0&lt;BR /&gt;  7 lo0        Loop        na/    na      na/     na     na/    na     na/    na&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# ifconfig lan0&lt;BR /&gt;lan0: flags=1843&lt;UP&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;        inet 10.131.3.101 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.131.3.255&lt;BR /&gt;# ifconfig lan4&lt;BR /&gt;lan4: flags=1843&lt;UP&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;        inet 10.131.3.102 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 10.131.3.255&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;they reside on same subnet.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;do you think i can use APA using those nic?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i tried to change the ip on the /etc/hosts and give the other nic (lan4) but it seems that lan0 has the highest util.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/UP&gt;&lt;/UP&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 06:42:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-rcp-ftp-processes/m-p/4126255#M315558</guid>
      <dc:creator>remer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-09T06:42:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: regarding rcp/ftp processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-rcp-ftp-processes/m-p/4126256#M315559</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Uhh, you have both NICs on the same subnet.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HP-UX considers that two NICs configured&lt;BR /&gt;in the same subnet have equal connectivity.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Traffic will be received on either, but &lt;BR /&gt;will only be sent out through one or the other.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you set ip_strong_es_model with ndd, it&lt;BR /&gt;may cause traffic that came in via one IP &lt;BR /&gt;have the replies go out that interface.&lt;BR /&gt;It will also require that traffic to a&lt;BR /&gt;given IP arrive on the interface with &lt;BR /&gt;the matching IP.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ip_strong_es_model:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Controls support for "Strong End-System &lt;BR /&gt;Model" described in RFC1122, Section 3.3.4.2. &lt;BR /&gt;When enabled, packet source addresses&lt;BR /&gt;(and therefore interfaces on a multihomed &lt;BR /&gt;host) affect selection of a gateway for &lt;BR /&gt;outbound packets. Set to 0 to disable;&lt;BR /&gt;set to 1 to enable. Default: 0 (disable)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Setting this value to one will have the&lt;BR /&gt;beneficial effect of allowing per-interface&lt;BR /&gt;default routes. It also means that if a&lt;BR /&gt;packet is received on a given interface,&lt;BR /&gt;the reply to that packet will be sent out&lt;BR /&gt;that interface. This can be useful if one&lt;BR /&gt;is in the rare situation of needing to have&lt;BR /&gt;separate physical (in the context of IP -&lt;BR /&gt;see ip_ill_status) interfaces configured&lt;BR /&gt;with IP addresses in the same subnet.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Generally, using Auto Port&lt;BR /&gt;Aggregation (APA) to create one virtual &lt;BR /&gt;interface with a logical interface for each address is more robust option.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also, when ip_strong_es_model is set to a value of one, IP datagrams arriving on the &lt;BR /&gt;"wrong" interface (one that does not have an IP address which matches the IP datagrams' &lt;BR /&gt;destination IP address) are discarded. If&lt;BR /&gt;one is using IP address aliases on the loopback (lo0) interface in support of functionality such as hardware load balancer&lt;BR /&gt;triangle routing, setting ip_strong_es_model &lt;BR /&gt;to a value of one may result in loss of connectivity for the virtual IP address.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So, go for the APA if you have the budget to&lt;BR /&gt;purchase it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;VK2COT</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 10:23:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-rcp-ftp-processes/m-p/4126256#M315559</guid>
      <dc:creator>VK2COT</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-09T10:23:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: regarding rcp/ftp processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-rcp-ftp-processes/m-p/4126257#M315560</link>
      <description>Two more things:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;a) What do the following command show:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;lanadmin -x 0&lt;BR /&gt;lanadmin -x 4&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;b) Network statistics:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;netstat -i&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;VK2COT</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 10:31:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-rcp-ftp-processes/m-p/4126257#M315560</guid>
      <dc:creator>VK2COT</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-09T10:31:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: regarding rcp/ftp processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-rcp-ftp-processes/m-p/4126258#M315561</link>
      <description>here's the output.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# netstat -i&lt;BR /&gt;Name      Mtu  Network         Address         Ipkts   Ierrs Opkts   Oerrs Coll&lt;BR /&gt;lan0      1500 10.131.3.0      10.131.3.101    1713862707 0     4244692507 0     0&lt;BR /&gt;lo0       4136 loopback        localhost       40667406 0     40667406 0     0&lt;BR /&gt;lan4      1500 10.131.3.0      drppcsd1        3555452208 0     3702750702 0     0&lt;BR /&gt;# lanadmin -x 0&lt;BR /&gt;Speed = 100 Full-Duplex.&lt;BR /&gt;Autonegotiation = On.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# lanadmin -x 4&lt;BR /&gt;Speed = 100 Full-Duplex.&lt;BR /&gt;Autonegotiation = On.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;#&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;btw, where can i find "ip_strong_es_model"?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:54:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-rcp-ftp-processes/m-p/4126258#M315561</guid>
      <dc:creator>remer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-10T00:54:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: regarding rcp/ftp processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-rcp-ftp-processes/m-p/4126259#M315562</link>
      <description>Hello again,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Your cards look good. There are no&lt;BR /&gt;collisions or errors on both interfaces.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regarding ip_strong_es_model:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;a) I am sure there are other posts in this Forum. Just search for them.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;b) Here is a nice reference:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://docs.hp.com/en/11890/perf-whitepaper-tcpip-v10.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://docs.hp.com/en/11890/perf-whitepaper-tcpip-v10.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There are many more at docs.hp.com.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;VK2COT</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 02:55:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-rcp-ftp-processes/m-p/4126259#M315562</guid>
      <dc:creator>VK2COT</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-10T02:55:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: regarding rcp/ftp processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-rcp-ftp-processes/m-p/4126260#M315563</link>
      <description>&amp;gt; ip_strong_es_model&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;This is one of the many tuning options available with the command ndd. To see all the options:&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;ndd -h&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;You can change values while running but you'll need to edit the nddconf file to make the change(s) permanent.&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Concerning the transfer rate, are you measuring the total transfer rate for all the processes at the same time? 1 ftp process might run at 50-70 MB/sec but two will run at 25-35 MB each. Thus 10 processes will run about 5-7MB (probably slower due to the overhead in interleaving all the requests). Note that APA won't help if your other end is on a single 1GB network. For APA to improve total throughput, the pipes between the two machines must be big enough to keep all the APA cards busy. And of course, your local machine will run no faster than the remote server.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 04:38:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-rcp-ftp-processes/m-p/4126260#M315563</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bill Hassell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-01-10T04:38:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

