<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Stale extents in VG00 in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/stale-extents-in-vg00/m-p/4355368#M345296</link>
    <description>Hi All,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I will try with the different disk.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But can it be by any way related to the LVM patches??&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-R.K.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 02:26:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>R.K. #</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-02-11T02:26:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Stale extents in VG00</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/stale-extents-in-vg00/m-p/4355364#M345292</link>
      <description>Hi All,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Lots of stuff for you guys to help me out of the situation :|&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Earlier I had the same issue two days back with /dev/vg00/lvol7, did lvsync and it worked fine. But now problem is in lvol6 and lvol8 and lvsync is NOT working.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Here is all what I have:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;rp5430 11.23&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# vgdisplay -v vg00 |more&lt;BR /&gt;--- Volume groups ---&lt;BR /&gt;VG Name /dev/vg00&lt;BR /&gt;VG Write Access read/write&lt;BR /&gt;VG Status available&lt;BR /&gt;Max LV 255&lt;BR /&gt;Cur LV 8&lt;BR /&gt;Open LV 8&lt;BR /&gt;Max PV 16&lt;BR /&gt;Cur PV 4&lt;BR /&gt;Act PV 4&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;LV Name /dev/vg00/lvol6&lt;BR /&gt;LV Status available/stale&lt;BR /&gt;LV Size (Mbytes) 512&lt;BR /&gt;Current LE 64&lt;BR /&gt;Allocated PE 128&lt;BR /&gt;Used PV 2&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;LV Name /dev/vg00/lvol8&lt;BR /&gt;LV Status available/stale&lt;BR /&gt;LV Size (Mbytes) 4608&lt;BR /&gt;Current LE 576&lt;BR /&gt;Allocated PE 1152&lt;BR /&gt;Used PV 2&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All disks are "available"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Problematic LV&lt;BR /&gt;/dev/vg00/lvol6&lt;BR /&gt;/dev/vg00/lvol8&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# strings /etc/lvmtab&lt;BR /&gt;/dev/vg00&lt;BR /&gt;/dev/dsk/c1t2d0&lt;BR /&gt;/dev/dsk/c1t0d0&lt;BR /&gt;/dev/dsk/c2t0d0&lt;BR /&gt;/dev/dsk/c2t2d0&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# lvdisplay -v /dev/vg00/lvol6 |more&lt;BR /&gt;--- Logical extents ---&lt;BR /&gt;LE PV1 PE1 Status 1 PV2 PE2 Status 2&lt;BR /&gt;00000 /dev/dsk/c1t0d0 01796 stale /dev/dsk/c2t0d0 01136 current&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# lvdisplay -v /dev/vg00/lvol8 |more&lt;BR /&gt;--- Logical extents ---&lt;BR /&gt;LE PV1 PE1 Status 1 PV2 PE2 Status 2&lt;BR /&gt;00000 /dev/dsk/c1t0d0 02372 current /dev/dsk/c2t0d0 01712 current&lt;BR /&gt;00001 /dev/dsk/c1t0d0 02373 current /dev/dsk/c2t0d0 01713 current&lt;BR /&gt;00002 /dev/dsk/c1t0d0 02374 stale /dev/dsk/c2t0d0 01714 current&lt;BR /&gt;00003 /dev/dsk/c1t0d0 02375 current /dev/dsk/c2t0d0 01715 current&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;#ioscan -fnC disk&lt;BR /&gt;disk 0 0/0/1/1.0.0 sdisk CLAIMED DEVICE HP 36.4GST336753LC&lt;BR /&gt;/dev/dsk/c1t0d0 /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;#diskinfo /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0&lt;BR /&gt;It is OK&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;#dd if=/dev/rdsk/c1t0d0 of=/dev/null bs=1024k  &lt;BR /&gt;It is also OK&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When trying to resync the lvols, getting following error:&lt;BR /&gt;# /usr/sbin/lvsync /dev/vg00/lvol6&lt;BR /&gt;lvsync: Couldn't re-synchronize stale partitions of the logical volume:&lt;BR /&gt;Device offline/Powerfailed&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;lvsync: Couldn't resynchronize logical volume "/dev/vg00/lvol6".&lt;BR /&gt;#&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Nothing related to disk error in syslog.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hardware engnr says disk is OK.&lt;BR /&gt;If it is NOT a disk issue, WHAT CAN IT BE ?????&lt;BR /&gt;Can it be a patch issue?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have a look on two of the LVM patches:&lt;BR /&gt;# PHCO_34036 1.0 LVM commands patch&lt;BR /&gt;# PHKL_33312 1.0 LVM Cumulative Patch&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;BR /&gt;R.K.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:03:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/stale-extents-in-vg00/m-p/4355364#M345292</guid>
      <dc:creator>R.K. #</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-10T08:03:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stale extents in VG00</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/stale-extents-in-vg00/m-p/4355365#M345293</link>
      <description>Shalom,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If lsync did the job a few days ago on the same problem, and now it does not work, it tells me the problem is disk related.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It leads me to believe a whole section of disk is not working and the problem is going to get worse.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Device offline/powerfailed points to a disk being bad. It passed the dd read test (good job) but its not good enough to handle the lvsync which as you imagine is a little disk intensive.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Things to do:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1) Take an ignite make_tape_recovery or make_net_recovery immediately. The system appears to be mirrored, but its getting worse and you could lose the system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2) Consult this document for further steps:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://docs.hp.com/en/T1859-90048/ch04s07.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://docs.hp.com/en/T1859-90048/ch04s07.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've seen where a hot swap disk behaves in this manner. You pop it out, pop it back in, lvsync works and everything seems fine. Some time later the symptom returns.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:30:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/stale-extents-in-vg00/m-p/4355365#M345293</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-10T08:30:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stale extents in VG00</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/stale-extents-in-vg00/m-p/4355366#M345294</link>
      <description>"Device offline/Powerfailed" usually means that a disk drive didn't respond to &lt;BR /&gt;a request but such an event should be sent to syslog.log by the drivers. Since &lt;BR /&gt;this didn't happen, the real issue is probably an I/O error which is &lt;BR /&gt;incorrectly reported by lvsync. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This is an example of /stand showing bad block&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As the read tests worked fine as well, chances are we're dealing with a write &lt;BR /&gt;problem to the stale extent on /dev/dsk/c5t6d0. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Using the unsupported bbdir.11 tool we checked the bad block directory &lt;BR /&gt;on the suspect drive : &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# bbdir.11 -d /dev/rdsk/c5t6d0 &lt;BR /&gt;Block device "/dev/dsk/c5t6d0" in vg /dev/vg00 &lt;BR /&gt;VG /dev/vg00 is activated &lt;BR /&gt;opening device /dev/rdsk/c5t6d0 block size 1 &lt;BR /&gt;Using the primary BBDIR &lt;BR /&gt;[1] bad block 16489 (PE# 4 data block 13577) alternate 0 &lt;BR /&gt;There are 1 entries in the BBDIR &lt;BR /&gt;No changes being made to the bbdir &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Here we clearly see that a block was marked bad but couldn't be relocated &lt;BR /&gt;(alternate is 0) because /stand has to be contiguous. Under these &lt;BR /&gt;circumstances &lt;BR /&gt;read requests might still succeed but a write request to the block will &lt;BR /&gt;immediately return an error. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Replacing disk c5t6d0 and doing another lvsync fixed the problem. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Note : Please contact your local HP Response Center to obtain a copy of &lt;BR /&gt;the bbdir.11 tool. &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:40:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/stale-extents-in-vg00/m-p/4355366#M345294</guid>
      <dc:creator>Avinash20</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-10T08:40:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stale extents in VG00</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/stale-extents-in-vg00/m-p/4355367#M345295</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It might be possible that disk may go offline intermittenly. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have you replaced the disk earlier? I would go with disk replacement first then look into other if problem persists after replacement also.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For confirmation, you can reduce the mirror from c1t0d0 and mirror it with another disk/LUN and watch the situation. If same issue then you can check other things.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:46:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/stale-extents-in-vg00/m-p/4355367#M345295</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ganesan R</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-10T08:46:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stale extents in VG00</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/stale-extents-in-vg00/m-p/4355368#M345296</link>
      <description>Hi All,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I will try with the different disk.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But can it be by any way related to the LVM patches??&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-R.K.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 02:26:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/stale-extents-in-vg00/m-p/4355368#M345296</guid>
      <dc:creator>R.K. #</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-11T02:26:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

