<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Corrupt patch problem in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/corrupt-patch-problem/m-p/4447969#M358336</link>
    <description>Shalom,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;swverify \* &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# Helps spot corrupt patches.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've found sometimes problems with the patch download process leads to corrupt installations. These patches include check sum information and it is worth ones time to confirm the check sum is what is expected.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also if possible to download patches using the ftp scripting method puts in an extra check, to make sure the whole thing comes down.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would swremove any corrupt patches, check the downloads, and re-do the downloads followed by swinstall of the new patch sets.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:24:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-07-01T00:24:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Corrupt patch problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/corrupt-patch-problem/m-p/4447962#M358329</link>
      <description>I installed some patches on my 11.23 HPUX server. One came back "corrupt". When i look at the "state" of the patch it is indeed reporting corrupt. The system is up and running fine, but what is a good practice to deal with corrupt patches? Should i swremove the patch and re-install with a clean replacement or just leave it alone?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:56:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/corrupt-patch-problem/m-p/4447962#M358329</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris Fadrowski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-26T11:56:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Corrupt patch problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/corrupt-patch-problem/m-p/4447963#M358330</link>
      <description>Hi Chris:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Try installing the patch again, adding the '-x reinstall=true' and '-x reinstall_files=true' options to 'swinstall'.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;...JRF...</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:23:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/corrupt-patch-problem/m-p/4447963#M358330</guid>
      <dc:creator>James R. Ferguson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-26T12:23:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Corrupt patch problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/corrupt-patch-problem/m-p/4447964#M358331</link>
      <description>James makes a very good recommendation (of course!).  I would be extremely leery of trying to swremove a patch that already has problems - what do you do if the remove fails?  That's why you make an Ignite recovery tape before you start.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The only thing I would add to James' advice is to try redownloading the patch beforehand - and verify the cksum!!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Pete</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:29:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/corrupt-patch-problem/m-p/4447964#M358331</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pete Randall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-26T12:29:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Corrupt patch problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/corrupt-patch-problem/m-p/4447965#M358332</link>
      <description>Thank you... points assigned.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:03:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/corrupt-patch-problem/m-p/4447965#M358332</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris Fadrowski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-26T13:03:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Corrupt patch problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/corrupt-patch-problem/m-p/4447966#M358333</link>
      <description>&amp;gt;Pete: try redownloading the patch beforehand - and verify the cksum!!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Typically the patch state "corrupt" isn't related to patch download problems.&lt;BR /&gt;This is more related to internal consistency problems with the IPD.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But if Chris still has the original depot, he can compare with a new one.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 07:56:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/corrupt-patch-problem/m-p/4447966#M358333</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dennis Handly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-27T07:56:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Corrupt patch problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/corrupt-patch-problem/m-p/4447967#M358334</link>
      <description>When you reinstall the patch is is possible that the rollback information will not be in a valid state.  You might consider committing that patch to eliminate the risk of a future failure.  A command of the form:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# swmodify -x patch_commit=true PATCH&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;where "PATCH" is replaced by the patch in question.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:04:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/corrupt-patch-problem/m-p/4447967#M358334</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bob E Campbell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-30T20:04:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Corrupt patch problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/corrupt-patch-problem/m-p/4447968#M358335</link>
      <description>Thats the reason why I like DRD - you patch the OS clone only. If something goes wrong, you have still the original version.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:08:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/corrupt-patch-problem/m-p/4447968#M358335</guid>
      <dc:creator>Torsten.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-30T21:08:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Corrupt patch problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/corrupt-patch-problem/m-p/4447969#M358336</link>
      <description>Shalom,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;swverify \* &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# Helps spot corrupt patches.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've found sometimes problems with the patch download process leads to corrupt installations. These patches include check sum information and it is worth ones time to confirm the check sum is what is expected.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also if possible to download patches using the ftp scripting method puts in an extra check, to make sure the whole thing comes down.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would swremove any corrupt patches, check the downloads, and re-do the downloads followed by swinstall of the new patch sets.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:24:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/corrupt-patch-problem/m-p/4447969#M358336</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-01T00:24:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Corrupt patch problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/corrupt-patch-problem/m-p/4447970#M358337</link>
      <description>e carefull when using reinstall=true flag&lt;BR /&gt;if you reinstall a base patch like PHKL_31500, and not the superseding ones result may be worse that before.&lt;BR /&gt;so be sure to reapply a full bundle.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:24:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/corrupt-patch-problem/m-p/4447970#M358337</guid>
      <dc:creator>Laurent Menase</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-01T07:24:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Corrupt patch problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/corrupt-patch-problem/m-p/4447971#M358338</link>
      <description>Hi (again):&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; SEP: I've found sometimes problems with the patch download process leads to corrupt installations.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You should re-read Dennis's comment.  That said, SWA uses MD5 sums to verify its downloaded software.  Even fetching individual patches from the ITRC and using the 'create_depot' shell script does a simple 'cksum' after unpacking.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;@ Laurent: Yes, good point.  THere are some "line-in-the-sand" patches that need extra special handling and reinstalling them can lead to horendous problems :-)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;...JRF...</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:57:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/corrupt-patch-problem/m-p/4447971#M358338</guid>
      <dc:creator>James R. Ferguson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-01T10:57:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

