<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Software Update Manager Tool in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/software-update-manager-tool/m-p/4607347#M376399</link>
    <description>Hi Mike:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I suspect that this is because the packages contain code that will run on either architecture.  In this case, the older "HP9000" designation suggests backward compatibility.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I think a label like "pa/ia64" or "9000/ia64 would be a better one.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;...JRF...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:48:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>James R. Ferguson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-03-25T15:48:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Software Update Manager Tool</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/software-update-manager-tool/m-p/4607346#M376398</link>
      <description>Why does the Software Update Manager at &lt;A href="http://www1.itrc.hp.com/service/sum/home.do" target="_blank"&gt;http://www1.itrc.hp.com/service/sum/home.do&lt;/A&gt; only show HP9000 OS version options versus also including Itanium OS software as well?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:31:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/software-update-manager-tool/m-p/4607346#M376398</guid>
      <dc:creator>mt_1299</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-25T15:31:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Software Update Manager Tool</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/software-update-manager-tool/m-p/4607347#M376399</link>
      <description>Hi Mike:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I suspect that this is because the packages contain code that will run on either architecture.  In this case, the older "HP9000" designation suggests backward compatibility.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I think a label like "pa/ia64" or "9000/ia64 would be a better one.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;...JRF...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:48:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/software-update-manager-tool/m-p/4607347#M376399</guid>
      <dc:creator>James R. Ferguson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-25T15:48:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Software Update Manager Tool</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/software-update-manager-tool/m-p/4607348#M376400</link>
      <description>Shalom,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My experience is that the software will run on either platform.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Do the download, then a swlist -l product -s &lt;DEPOT path=""&gt; to confirm.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Backward compatibility is how HP said they would do this.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP&lt;/DEPOT&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:50:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/software-update-manager-tool/m-p/4607348#M376400</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-25T15:50:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Software Update Manager Tool</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/software-update-manager-tool/m-p/4607349#M376401</link>
      <description>I ran the command you mentioned above, but I don't see anything in the output that indicates the software is for IA64 systems.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Would I receive an error if the software was not for the system I was running the swlist command on?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:57:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/software-update-manager-tool/m-p/4607349#M376401</guid>
      <dc:creator>mt_1299</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-25T15:57:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Software Update Manager Tool</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/software-update-manager-tool/m-p/4607350#M376402</link>
      <description>It depends on the kind of HP systems you have under a support contract.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:00:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/software-update-manager-tool/m-p/4607350#M376402</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sameer_Nirmal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-25T16:00:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Software Update Manager Tool</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/software-update-manager-tool/m-p/4607351#M376403</link>
      <description>Thanks Sameer,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We actually have contracts that relate to IA64 boxes but when I navigate to the SUM, I don't see download options for just IA64 software -- it appears as others have written above that this is related to backwards compatibility.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:03:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/software-update-manager-tool/m-p/4607351#M376403</guid>
      <dc:creator>mt_1299</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-25T16:03:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

