<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: + sign in the file permission characters in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sign-in-the-file-permission-characters/m-p/2621348#M38809</link>
    <description>Hi &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yep , you need all the patches that i gave because all the patches are the dep. of the patch of the ACL .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i solve 3 cases like this and it is in all the cases the same , that not all the dep. of the ACL patches are install . &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;try it .</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2001 09:11:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>eran maor</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2001-11-29T09:11:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>+ sign in the file permission characters</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sign-in-the-file-permission-characters/m-p/2621343#M38804</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;I have this output from a workstation:&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;/test/optfun # mount -v&lt;BR /&gt;/dev/vg00/lvol3 on / type vxfs log on Thu Nov 22 12:40:38 2001&lt;BR /&gt;/dev/vg00/lvol1 on /stand type hfs defaults on Thu Nov 22 12:40:40 2001&lt;BR /&gt;/dev/vg00/lvol8 on /var type vxfs delaylog on Thu Nov 22 12:40:45 2001&lt;BR /&gt;/dev/vg00/lvol7 on /usr type vxfs delaylog on Thu Nov 22 12:40:45 2001&lt;BR /&gt;/dev/vg00/lvol6 on /tmp type vxfs delaylog on Thu Nov 22 12:40:45 2001&lt;BR /&gt;/dev/vg00/lvol5 on /opt type vxfs delaylog on Thu Nov 22 12:40:45 2001&lt;BR /&gt;/dev/vg00/lvol4 on /home type vxfs delaylog on Thu Nov 22 12:40:45 2001&lt;BR /&gt;osaka:/opt/fun on /test/optfun type nfs defaults,NFSv3 on Wed Nov 28 12:47:45 20&lt;BR /&gt;01&lt;BR /&gt;/test/optfun # ll&lt;BR /&gt;total 164&lt;BR /&gt;-rwxr-xr-x   1 root       sys          20537 Nov 28 12:28 melt&lt;BR /&gt;-rwxr-xr-x   1 root       sys          61644 Nov 28 12:28 xroach&lt;BR /&gt;/test/optfun # chmod 777 melt xroach&lt;BR /&gt;chmod: can't change melt: Read-only file system&lt;BR /&gt;chmod: can't change xroach: Read-only file system&lt;BR /&gt;/test/optfun # ll&lt;BR /&gt;total 164&lt;BR /&gt;-rwxr-xr-x+  1 root       sys          20537 Nov 28 12:28 melt&lt;BR /&gt;-rwxr-xr-x+  1 root       sys          61644 Nov 28 12:28 xroac&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;What is the meanings of + at the end of the permission access for the files? TQ</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2001 06:14:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sign-in-the-file-permission-characters/m-p/2621343#M38804</guid>
      <dc:creator>S.C. Fun</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-11-28T06:14:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: + sign in the file permission characters</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sign-in-the-file-permission-characters/m-p/2621344#M38805</link>
      <description>From the man page of ll:&lt;BR /&gt; "If a file has optional ACL entries, the -l (ell) option displays a plus sign (+) after the file's permissions.  The permissions shown are a summary representation of the file's access control list, as         &lt;BR /&gt; returned by stat() in the st_mode field (see stat(2))."</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2001 06:21:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sign-in-the-file-permission-characters/m-p/2621344#M38805</guid>
      <dc:creator>Deepak Extross</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-11-28T06:21:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: + sign in the file permission characters</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sign-in-the-file-permission-characters/m-p/2621345#M38806</link>
      <description>but why the + sign disappeared after a while even I've not done anything to the files?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2001 06:29:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sign-in-the-file-permission-characters/m-p/2621345#M38806</guid>
      <dc:creator>S.C. Fun</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-11-28T06:29:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: + sign in the file permission characters</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sign-in-the-file-permission-characters/m-p/2621346#M38807</link>
      <description>Hi &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;this is a know issue in hp-ux . &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i will check the patch PHCO_20031 - s700_800 11.00 Enhance ls(1) to work with JFS ACLs &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1. see that he is install correct - check it with swlist -l fileset -a state &lt;BR /&gt;to see if he is in the state of config . &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2. see that you have all dep of the patch &lt;BR /&gt;    PHCO_20031    1.0            Enhance ls(1) to work with JFS ACLs.&lt;BR /&gt;  PHCO_23651    1.0            fsck_vxfs(1M) cumulative patch&lt;BR /&gt;  PHCO_23876    1.0            cumulative SAM/ObAM patch&lt;BR /&gt;  PHCO_23963    1.0            libc cumulative header file patch&lt;BR /&gt;  PHCO_24723    1.0            libc cumulative patch&lt;BR /&gt;  PHKL_18543    1.0            PM/VM/UFS/async/scsi/io/DMAPI/JFS/perf patch&lt;BR /&gt;  PHKL_20016    1.0            2nd CPU not recognized in G70/H70/I70&lt;BR /&gt;  PHKL_22677    1.0            fix of getdirentries, MVFS, rcp, mmap &amp;amp; IDS&lt;BR /&gt;  PHKL_23226    1.0            syscall, msem_lock, umask cumulative patch&lt;BR /&gt;  PHKL_24027    1.0            VxFS 3.1 comulative patch&lt;BR /&gt;  PHKL_25475    1.0            PM cumulative patch&lt;BR /&gt;  PHKL_25525    1.0       Probe,IDDS,PM,VM,PA-8700,asyncio,T600,FS&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;this is for hp-ux 11.00 but if you are working with 10.20 do the same .</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2001 07:34:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sign-in-the-file-permission-characters/m-p/2621346#M38807</guid>
      <dc:creator>eran maor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-11-28T07:34:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: + sign in the file permission characters</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sign-in-the-file-permission-characters/m-p/2621347#M38808</link>
      <description>Hi eran,&lt;BR /&gt;I have the output from swlist like this:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# PHCO_20031&lt;BR /&gt;  PHCO_20031.UX-CORE                    configured&lt;BR /&gt;# PHKL_18543&lt;BR /&gt;  PHKL_18543.C-INC                      configured&lt;BR /&gt;  PHKL_18543.CORE-KRN                   configured&lt;BR /&gt;  PHKL_18543.CORE2-KRN                  configured&lt;BR /&gt;  PHKL_18543.KERN2-RUN                  configured&lt;BR /&gt;  PHKL_18543.VXFS-ADV-KRN               configured&lt;BR /&gt;  PHKL_18543.VXFS-BASE-KRN              configured&lt;BR /&gt;  PHKL_18543.VXFS-PRG                   configured&lt;BR /&gt;# PHKL_20016&lt;BR /&gt;  PHKL_20016.CORE2-KRN                  configured&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;some of the patches you mentioned are not there, do you mean I have to apply them all to get rid of it? what command is used to display details of ACL in JFS? tq.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:23:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sign-in-the-file-permission-characters/m-p/2621347#M38808</guid>
      <dc:creator>S.C. Fun</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-11-28T08:23:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: + sign in the file permission characters</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sign-in-the-file-permission-characters/m-p/2621348#M38809</link>
      <description>Hi &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yep , you need all the patches that i gave because all the patches are the dep. of the patch of the ACL .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i solve 3 cases like this and it is in all the cases the same , that not all the dep. of the ACL patches are install . &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;try it .</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2001 09:11:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sign-in-the-file-permission-characters/m-p/2621348#M38809</guid>
      <dc:creator>eran maor</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-11-29T09:11:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

