<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: vmstat: negative values?! in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vmstat-negative-values/m-p/4933052#M410370</link>
    <description>&lt;A href="http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/HP-UX-Admin/2005-06/0017.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/HP-UX-Admin/2005-06/0017.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It says, ..."vmstat tries to present an average since boot on the first line. The&lt;BR /&gt;first line of vmstat output is utter garbage and must be discarded"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I was only running vmstat for a single count. When run with mutiple counts&lt;BR /&gt;the stats after the first line are reported accurately. "" &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-Arun</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 06:25:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Arunvijai_4</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-10-12T06:25:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>vmstat: negative values?!</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vmstat-negative-values/m-p/4933050#M410368</link>
      <description>Hello, i'm monitoring a largely stressed system. That's an rp5470 (L3000-5xx) w/ 2 550MHz CPU 4 GB of mem running a J2EE app and an Oracle 9i database.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What is confusing me now is the negative values in the response to the "vmstat -f" command :&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# vmstat -f&lt;BR /&gt;3031208 forks, -433171143 pages, average=  -142.90&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any hints?&lt;BR /&gt;Thx in advance</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 05:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vmstat-negative-values/m-p/4933050#M410368</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alberto Rocha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-12T05:09:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: vmstat: negative values?!</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vmstat-negative-values/m-p/4933051#M410369</link>
      <description>The values in vmstat are signed data types so they can overflow as the counter gets larger. This should appear if your system is up for a very long time or the memory page swapping is too high.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;hth</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 05:43:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vmstat-negative-values/m-p/4933051#M410369</guid>
      <dc:creator>Orhan Biyiklioglu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-12T05:43:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: vmstat: negative values?!</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vmstat-negative-values/m-p/4933052#M410370</link>
      <description>&lt;A href="http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/HP-UX-Admin/2005-06/0017.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/HP-UX-Admin/2005-06/0017.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It says, ..."vmstat tries to present an average since boot on the first line. The&lt;BR /&gt;first line of vmstat output is utter garbage and must be discarded"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I was only running vmstat for a single count. When run with mutiple counts&lt;BR /&gt;the stats after the first line are reported accurately. "" &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-Arun</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 06:25:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vmstat-negative-values/m-p/4933052#M410370</guid>
      <dc:creator>Arunvijai_4</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-12T06:25:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: vmstat: negative values?!</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vmstat-negative-values/m-p/4933053#M410371</link>
      <description>Hi Alberto,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It is overflow.&lt;BR /&gt;Try first to clear with&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;vmstat -z&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regrads,&lt;BR /&gt;Borislav&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 06:48:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vmstat-negative-values/m-p/4933053#M410371</guid>
      <dc:creator>Borislav Perkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-12T06:48:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: vmstat: negative values?!</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vmstat-negative-values/m-p/4933054#M410372</link>
      <description>Thank you for all the replies. In fact i suspected of some kind of overflow but now i have the confirmation.&lt;BR /&gt;AR</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 07:05:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vmstat-negative-values/m-p/4933054#M410372</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alberto Rocha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-12T07:05:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

