<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: multiplying defunct processes in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937219#M411071</link>
    <description>You did post it - under "Security"!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=969878" target="_blank"&gt;http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=969878&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Pete</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:42:35 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Pete Randall</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-10-28T10:42:35Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>multiplying defunct processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937217#M411069</link>
      <description>Thought I posted this, but can't find it so reposting; sorry if its a duplicate:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We patched the system (HPUX B.11.00 U 9000/800) last weekend (after several years) and the process we have always used to kill users still logged in is suddenly causing rapidly multiplying defunct processes.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The shell script that runs nightly basically does this:&lt;BR /&gt;1. Find all â  kshâ   processes and kill the ppid and pid (kill â  9  ppid  pid)&lt;BR /&gt;2. Find any remaining processes locally attached to the Oracle db and kill the ppid and pid.&lt;BR /&gt;3. Find any remaining processes non-locally attached to the Oracle db and kill the ppid and pid.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In June, we stopped executing the first step, and only looked for processes actually attached to the db and killed them.  No problems.  After hitting this problem this week, the first step was reinstated, and then altered to only kill the ppid (not the pid) of the â  kshâ   process, but that did not help.  Here is a summary of what happens:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;â  Normalâ    user session:&lt;BR /&gt;    root  4095   955  0 08:59:28 pts/tad   0:00 telnetd&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay  4096  4095  0 08:59:30 pts/tad   0:05 -ksh&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay 17366  4096  0 12:08:27 pts/tad   0:07 quick subdict=search auto=/uk_home/jervis/v63yoln/MENUGO.qkg&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay 17382 17366  0 12:08:29 ?         0:00 oracleUK (DESCRIPTION=(LOCAL=YES)(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=beq)))&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Now the kill script kicks in:&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay  4096     1  1 08:59:30 ?         0:05 -ksh&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay  1918     1  0 19:01:44 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay  2362  4096  0 19:01:45 ?         0:00 -ksh&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And 10 seconds later:&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay  4096     1  1 08:59:30 ?         0:05 -ksh&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay  7649     1  0 19:02:06 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And about 20 seconds later:&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay  4096     1  0 08:59:30 ?         0:05 -ksh&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay  7651     1  1 19:02:06 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay  7649     1  0 19:02:06 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay  9016  4096  0 19:02:11 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay  9493     1  0 19:02:13 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay  9492     1  0 19:02:13 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay 11412     1  1 19:02:21 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay 11411     1  0 19:02:21 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay 13228     1  1 19:02:28 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay 16543     1  0 19:02:41 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay 13156     1  0 19:02:27 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay 13624     1  2 19:02:29 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay 13623     1  0 19:02:29 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay 17020     1  1 19:02:42 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay 15600     1  2 19:02:37 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay 17935     1  1 19:02:46 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay 15527     1  1 19:02:37 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay 16946     1  0 19:02:42 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay 18311     1  0 19:02:47 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay 18415     1  3 19:02:48 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay 16616     1  0 19:02:41 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay 20387     1  0 19:02:55 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay 20472     1  1 19:02:56 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay 23532     1  0 19:03:07 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   upmay 23531     1  1 19:03:07 ?         0:00 &lt;DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;These processes continue to multiply until the process table is filled.  This seems to happen only when the kill script is run at 7:00pm each night.  I can kill a user session from the unix prompt in exactly the same manner and cannot seem to reproduce this problem.  Any ideas, anyone ???? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;&lt;/DEFUNCT&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:05:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937217#M411069</guid>
      <dc:creator>Evelyn Daroga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-28T10:05:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiplying defunct processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937218#M411070</link>
      <description>Evelyn,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   It will help if you can post the kill script.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-Sundar.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:30:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937218#M411070</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sundar_7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-28T10:30:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiplying defunct processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937219#M411071</link>
      <description>You did post it - under "Security"!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=969878" target="_blank"&gt;http://forums1.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=969878&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Pete</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:42:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937219#M411071</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pete Randall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-28T10:42:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiplying defunct processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937220#M411072</link>
      <description>Here's what the script does:&lt;BR /&gt;----------------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;ps -ef | \&lt;BR /&gt;  tail +2 | \&lt;BR /&gt;  grep ksh | \&lt;BR /&gt;  grep -v "`cat /fh_scripts/isusers.list`" | \&lt;BR /&gt;  awk '$1 !~ /^c/ {print "kill -9 " $3}' | \&lt;BR /&gt;  sh  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;for db in `echo ${dbarray[*]}`&lt;BR /&gt;do&lt;BR /&gt;  echo "Now killing LOCAL users in:  $db"&lt;BR /&gt;  ps -ef | \&lt;BR /&gt;  tail +2 | \&lt;BR /&gt;  grep oracle$db | \&lt;BR /&gt;  grep -v oracle"$db"0899 | \&lt;BR /&gt;  grep "LOCAL=YES" | \&lt;BR /&gt;  grep -v "^  oracle" | \&lt;BR /&gt;  awk '{print "kill -9 " $3," ", $2}' | \&lt;BR /&gt;  sh&lt;BR /&gt;done&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;for db in `echo ${dbarray[*]}`&lt;BR /&gt;do&lt;BR /&gt;  echo "Now killing NON-LOCAL users in:  $db"&lt;BR /&gt;  ps -ef | \&lt;BR /&gt;  tail +2 | \&lt;BR /&gt;  grep oracle$db | \&lt;BR /&gt;  grep -v oracle"$db"0899 | \&lt;BR /&gt;  grep "LOCAL=NO" | \&lt;BR /&gt;  awk '{print "kill -9 " $2}' | \&lt;BR /&gt;  sh&lt;BR /&gt;done&lt;BR /&gt;----------------------------&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks.....</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:44:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937220#M411072</guid>
      <dc:creator>Evelyn Daroga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-28T10:44:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiplying defunct processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937221#M411073</link>
      <description>Thanks, Pete!  Not sure how I did that.&lt;BR /&gt;I've closed that one.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 10:52:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937221#M411073</guid>
      <dc:creator>Evelyn Daroga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-28T10:52:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiplying defunct processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937222#M411074</link>
      <description>Evelyn,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  I am not too sure about killing the PPID. if the child ksh is killed, the parent (telnetd or rlogind or sshd) typically exits gracefully.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  I am also not too comfortable just greping for ksh. This will kill processes that you dont want to get killed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  Try this&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  kill -9 $(ps -ef | egrep -i "^-ksh$|^ksh$" | grep -f /fh_scripts/isusers.list | egrep -v "^c" |  awk '{print $2}')&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sundar.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:00:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937222#M411074</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sundar_7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-28T11:00:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiplying defunct processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937223#M411075</link>
      <description>what is the parent behavior ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;upmay 4096 1 0 08:59:30 ? 0:05 -ksh&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;my guess it wakes up and see that a child is not responding, so it starts another child process, and so. on.. like a good daemon might behave.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;can you kill JUST the parent daemon first so all it's child die at the same time ?  Have you tried this one ?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:04:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937223#M411075</guid>
      <dc:creator>D Block 2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-28T11:04:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiplying defunct processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937224#M411076</link>
      <description>duh, sorry my egrep wont work. I hope this one does&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;kill -9 $(ps -ef | awk '$NF ~ /-ksh/ -o $NF /ksh/ {print}' | grep -f /fh_scripts/isusers.list | egrep -v "^c" | awk '{print $2}')</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:06:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937224#M411076</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sundar_7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-28T11:06:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiplying defunct processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937225#M411077</link>
      <description>Tom,&lt;BR /&gt;exactly which "parent daemon" are you saying I should kill?  telnetd? I don't think I want to do that. Telnetd is parent to ksh, which is parent to the rest of the session processes, so I've been killing ksh. In this example, the "family" is:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;child               parent&lt;BR /&gt; 955 (telnetd)         1  (inetd)&lt;BR /&gt;4095 (ksh)           955 (telnetd)&lt;BR /&gt;4096 (quick...)     4095 (ksh)&lt;BR /&gt;17366 (oracleUK...) 4096 (quick...)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;At this point, the first pass is killing just 4095 (ksh).  So, is telnetd spawning replacement ksh processes?  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sundar,&lt;BR /&gt;Looks like your cmd does the same thing as mind, although more efficiently.  I noticed however that you are killing $2 rather than $3. So, you would kill 4096 rather than 4095?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;BTW I have run this script on our development system with no problems.  That system was patched couple months ago (same patchset). Obviously, I cannot run it on the production sys except once/day at 7:00pm.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:04:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937225#M411077</guid>
      <dc:creator>Evelyn Daroga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-28T13:04:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiplying defunct processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937226#M411078</link>
      <description>Sorry everybody..  I have described the family incorrectly.  Here is the correct version:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;child              parent           command&lt;BR /&gt;955 (inetd)           1 (init)      inetd&lt;BR /&gt;4095 (telnetd)      955 (inetd)     telnetd&lt;BR /&gt;4096 (ksh)         4095 (telnetd)   ksh&lt;BR /&gt;17366 (quick)      4096 (ksh)       quick&lt;BR /&gt;17392 (oracleUK)  17633 (quick)     oracleUK&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've been killing 4095, the parent of ksh.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:20:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937226#M411078</guid>
      <dc:creator>Evelyn Daroga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-28T13:20:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiplying defunct processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937227#M411079</link>
      <description>well, what can I say - lucky you , you got features along with the patches !!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;if you ask me, I would kill PID , instead of PPID.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:43:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937227#M411079</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sundar_7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-28T13:43:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiplying defunct processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937228#M411080</link>
      <description>I would shoot someone who threw kill -9's around this indiscriminatingly. At the very least you are leaving temporary files and probably shared memory segments dangling. Start with the PID's rather than PPID's and kill in this order: -15, -1, -2, -3, -11, and finally (and only if necessary kill -9). You should also test if the process is still alive by sending a kill -0 PID between each of the progressive kills; if the result is 0 the process is still alive but if ${?} is non-zero then it's gone.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:52:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937228#M411080</guid>
      <dc:creator>A. Clay Stephenson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-28T13:52:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiplying defunct processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937229#M411081</link>
      <description>Ok, I'll change from killing ppid to killing pid tonight. I'll advise and assign points next week if it works.  Then I'll clean up the kill -9's.  And then I guess I should put a gun to my head!&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for all the input -- I appreciate the support!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:10:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937229#M411081</guid>
      <dc:creator>Evelyn Daroga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-28T14:10:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiplying defunct processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937230#M411082</link>
      <description>I believe shell processes (ksh/sh) ignore SIGTERM. My attempt to send -15 to shell processes never managed to kill the processes. I always had to use -9.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:29:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937230#M411082</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sundar_7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-28T14:29:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiplying defunct processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937231#M411083</link>
      <description>Neverless, when killing processes start with a peashooter and end with a cannon. That's why I listed the signals in that order. Note that a kill -11 is almost as deadly as a kill -9 but it does cleanup.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:34:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937231#M411083</guid>
      <dc:creator>A. Clay Stephenson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-28T14:34:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiplying defunct processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937232#M411084</link>
      <description>Thank you Sundar for the supportive comment! I appreciate it.&lt;BR /&gt;Clay, your comments are well-taken.  The pea-shooter/canon analagy is a good one.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have changed the script to kill the PIDâ  s rather than the PPIDâ  s, and still getting the defunct processes.  On Sunday I ran the script again to kill user sessions, and still got the defunct processes multiplying.  Once I got them cleaned up so that nobody was logged in except me, I then logged in 4 times, ran the script, and got NO defunct processes.  I then logged in 6 times, and then 20 times, ran the script and got NO defunct processes.  So I am unable to reproduce this at will.  I am logging in as any other user (not a privâ  d account), and the processes associated with each login is the same as the scenario I described last week.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;From what I can tell, it appears that when I kill the PPID, it is the â  kshâ   process that is spawning the defunct processes.  But when I kill the PID, it is the â  quickâ   process that is spawning the defunct processes. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Could I be exceeding some threshold??  Any other ideas? &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:01:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937232#M411084</guid>
      <dc:creator>Evelyn Daroga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-10-31T10:01:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiplying defunct processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937233#M411085</link>
      <description>Well, after fighting for another week, it appears that my kills may have been clobbering each other.  I put a sleep command between them and the defunct processes seem to be under control.  Thanks for the input, everyone.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:18:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937233#M411085</guid>
      <dc:creator>Evelyn Daroga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-11-07T09:18:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiplying defunct processes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937234#M411086</link>
      <description>.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 09:21:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiplying-defunct-processes/m-p/4937234#M411086</guid>
      <dc:creator>Evelyn Daroga</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-11-07T09:21:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

