<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic MEMORY Utilization / Buffer Cache issue in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/memory-utilization-buffer-cache-issue/m-p/5079696#M440197</link>
    <description>Hi all.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have 2 rx8640 running as DB cluster.&lt;BR /&gt;During the initial startup when two servers join in a partition, memory utilization is same with 9%. When DB is opened on both nodes, 40% utilization on both nodes. But when we started our POC testings, memory utilization on node1 is higher than 5% than node2.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;On my initial investigation, below are the informations i have gathered:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;*Both nodes are running 95GB each&lt;BR /&gt;*Node1 Buf Cache:   4.8gb&lt;BR /&gt;*Node2 Buf Cache:   1.9gb&lt;BR /&gt;*kernel parameters are equal on both nodes&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ipcs in node1:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# ipcs -m&lt;BR /&gt;IPC status from /dev/kmem as of Thu Nov 15 11:40:17 2007&lt;BR /&gt;T         ID     KEY        MODE        OWNER     GROUP&lt;BR /&gt;Shared Memory:&lt;BR /&gt;m          0 0x411c07db --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m          1 0x4e0c0002 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m          2 0x412038e0 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m          3 0x00a5c581 --rw-------     sfmdb     users&lt;BR /&gt;m     819204 0x4d4e5251 --rw-r--r--      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m      32773 0x55315352 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m      32774 0x44525354 --rw-r--r--      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m      32775 0x53494152 --rw-r--r--      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m      32776 0x00005643 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m          9 0x00005654 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m     983050 0x06347849 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m      65547 0x0c6629c9 --rw-r-----      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m     131084 0x49180468 --rw-r--r--      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m    3014669 0xf8029b68 --rw-r-----    oracle       dba&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ipcs in node2:&lt;BR /&gt;# ipcs -m&lt;BR /&gt;IPC status from /dev/kmem as of Thu Nov 15 11:40:34 2007&lt;BR /&gt;T         ID     KEY        MODE        OWNER     GROUP&lt;BR /&gt;Shared Memory:&lt;BR /&gt;m          0 0x411c07db --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m          1 0x4e0c0002 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m          2 0x412089bb --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m          3 0x00a5c581 --rw-------     sfmdb     users&lt;BR /&gt;m     720900 0x4d4e5251 --rw-r--r--      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m      32773 0x55315352 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m      32774 0x44525354 --rw-r--r--      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m      32775 0x53494152 --rw-r--r--      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m      65544 0x00005643 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m          9 0x00005654 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m    1900554 0x06347849 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m         11 0x0c6629c9 --rw-r-----      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m      65548 0x49180468 --rw-r--r--      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m    1507341 0xa0b335ec --rw-r-----    oracle       dba&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is the result in ipcs has something to do with the memory utilization and buf cache difference between the two nodes?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Please be informed that I only have one more week before putting this machines into production.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Appreciate your advises and answers.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:49:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jojo Castro</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-11-14T22:49:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MEMORY Utilization / Buffer Cache issue</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/memory-utilization-buffer-cache-issue/m-p/5079696#M440197</link>
      <description>Hi all.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have 2 rx8640 running as DB cluster.&lt;BR /&gt;During the initial startup when two servers join in a partition, memory utilization is same with 9%. When DB is opened on both nodes, 40% utilization on both nodes. But when we started our POC testings, memory utilization on node1 is higher than 5% than node2.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;On my initial investigation, below are the informations i have gathered:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;*Both nodes are running 95GB each&lt;BR /&gt;*Node1 Buf Cache:   4.8gb&lt;BR /&gt;*Node2 Buf Cache:   1.9gb&lt;BR /&gt;*kernel parameters are equal on both nodes&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ipcs in node1:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# ipcs -m&lt;BR /&gt;IPC status from /dev/kmem as of Thu Nov 15 11:40:17 2007&lt;BR /&gt;T         ID     KEY        MODE        OWNER     GROUP&lt;BR /&gt;Shared Memory:&lt;BR /&gt;m          0 0x411c07db --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m          1 0x4e0c0002 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m          2 0x412038e0 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m          3 0x00a5c581 --rw-------     sfmdb     users&lt;BR /&gt;m     819204 0x4d4e5251 --rw-r--r--      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m      32773 0x55315352 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m      32774 0x44525354 --rw-r--r--      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m      32775 0x53494152 --rw-r--r--      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m      32776 0x00005643 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m          9 0x00005654 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m     983050 0x06347849 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m      65547 0x0c6629c9 --rw-r-----      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m     131084 0x49180468 --rw-r--r--      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m    3014669 0xf8029b68 --rw-r-----    oracle       dba&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ipcs in node2:&lt;BR /&gt;# ipcs -m&lt;BR /&gt;IPC status from /dev/kmem as of Thu Nov 15 11:40:34 2007&lt;BR /&gt;T         ID     KEY        MODE        OWNER     GROUP&lt;BR /&gt;Shared Memory:&lt;BR /&gt;m          0 0x411c07db --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m          1 0x4e0c0002 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m          2 0x412089bb --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m          3 0x00a5c581 --rw-------     sfmdb     users&lt;BR /&gt;m     720900 0x4d4e5251 --rw-r--r--      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m      32773 0x55315352 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m      32774 0x44525354 --rw-r--r--      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m      32775 0x53494152 --rw-r--r--      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m      65544 0x00005643 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m          9 0x00005654 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m    1900554 0x06347849 --rw-rw-rw-      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m         11 0x0c6629c9 --rw-r-----      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m      65548 0x49180468 --rw-r--r--      root      root&lt;BR /&gt;m    1507341 0xa0b335ec --rw-r-----    oracle       dba&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is the result in ipcs has something to do with the memory utilization and buf cache difference between the two nodes?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Please be informed that I only have one more week before putting this machines into production.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Appreciate your advises and answers.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:49:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/memory-utilization-buffer-cache-issue/m-p/5079696#M440197</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jojo Castro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-14T22:49:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MEMORY Utilization / Buffer Cache issue</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/memory-utilization-buffer-cache-issue/m-p/5079697#M440198</link>
      <description>What part of DYNAMIC buffer cache do you not understand? I would be very surprised if two identically configured and identically loaded (from the standpoint of processes running) would display identical buffer cache utilization. The whole point of dynamic buffer cache is that it is dynamic. The differences you are seeing are normal and expected. You could set dbc_min_pct = dbc_max_pct and thus fix the buffer cache.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 23:09:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/memory-utilization-buffer-cache-issue/m-p/5079697#M440198</guid>
      <dc:creator>A. Clay Stephenson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-14T23:09:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MEMORY Utilization / Buffer Cache issue</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/memory-utilization-buffer-cache-issue/m-p/5079698#M440199</link>
      <description>What part of DYNAMIC buffer cache do you not understand? I would be very surprised if two identically configured and identically loaded (from the standpoint of processes running) would display identical buffer cache utilization. The whole point of dynamic buffer cache is that it is dynamic. The differences you are seeing are normal and expected. You could set dbc_min_pct = dbc_max_pct and thus fix the buffer cache.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;===&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes it is identically configured (including dbc_min_pct &amp;amp; dbc_max_pct). Also, identically loaded from the standpoint of processes. My questions are, thus dynamic buffer cache usage has something to do with the memory usage? Why is it that node1 memory utilization is 5% higher than that of node2?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 23:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/memory-utilization-buffer-cache-issue/m-p/5079698#M440199</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jojo Castro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-14T23:36:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MEMORY Utilization / Buffer Cache issue</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/memory-utilization-buffer-cache-issue/m-p/5079699#M440200</link>
      <description>What part of DYNAMIC buffer cache do you not understand? I would be very surprised if two identically configured and identically loaded (from the standpoint of processes running) would display identical buffer cache utilization. The whole point of dynamic buffer cache is that it is dynamic. The differences you are seeing are normal and expected. You could set dbc_min_pct = dbc_max_pct and thus fix the buffer cache.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;===&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes it is identically configured (including dbc_min_pct &amp;amp; dbc_max_pct). Also, identically loaded from the standpoint of processes. My questions are, thus dynamic buffer cache usage has something to do with the memory usage? Why is it that node1 memory utilization is 5% higher than that of node2?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;by the way, please find below setting of dbc_min_pct &amp;amp; dbc_max_pct on both nodes.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# kctune | grep dbc_max_pct&lt;BR /&gt;dbc_max_pct                          5  5            Immed&lt;BR /&gt;# kctune | grep dbc_min_pct&lt;BR /&gt;dbc_min_pct                          1  1            Immed&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 23:46:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/memory-utilization-buffer-cache-issue/m-p/5079699#M440200</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jojo Castro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-14T23:46:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MEMORY Utilization / Buffer Cache issue</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/memory-utilization-buffer-cache-issue/m-p/5079700#M440201</link>
      <description>hello all, any answers please?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:14:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/memory-utilization-buffer-cache-issue/m-p/5079700#M440201</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jojo Castro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-15T22:14:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MEMORY Utilization / Buffer Cache issue</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/memory-utilization-buffer-cache-issue/m-p/5079701#M440202</link>
      <description>Jojo,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; It is also depands how many Oracle process you are running on each individual nodes right ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;  It is possible Node 1 has more running process than Node 2 ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;WK</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:20:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/memory-utilization-buffer-cache-issue/m-p/5079701#M440202</guid>
      <dc:creator>whiteknight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-15T22:20:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MEMORY Utilization / Buffer Cache issue</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/memory-utilization-buffer-cache-issue/m-p/5079702#M440203</link>
      <description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt;thus dynamic buffer cache usage has something to do with the memory usage?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Well, yes.  The buffer cache is a portion of memory.  So, as dbc usage increases, so does memory usage overall.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:22:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/memory-utilization-buffer-cache-issue/m-p/5079702#M440203</guid>
      <dc:creator>Patrick Wallek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-15T22:22:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MEMORY Utilization / Buffer Cache issue</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/memory-utilization-buffer-cache-issue/m-p/5079703#M440204</link>
      <description>Jojo,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1 more advise.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you run the test for a while you might be able to use AWR (Statpack) to see what the Oracle SGA component sizes are....perhaps some are changed dynamically in the DB's auto-tuning mechanisms.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;WK</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 00:58:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/memory-utilization-buffer-cache-issue/m-p/5079703#M440204</guid>
      <dc:creator>whiteknight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-16T00:58:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MEMORY Utilization / Buffer Cache issue</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/memory-utilization-buffer-cache-issue/m-p/5079704#M440205</link>
      <description>Jojo,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1 more advise.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you run the test for a while you might be able to use AWR (Statpack) to see what the Oracle SGA component sizes are....perhaps some are changed dynamically in the DB's auto-tuning mechanisms.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;WK&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;====&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks so much WK. What is AWR? How can i get those and how can i execute it?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 01:03:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/memory-utilization-buffer-cache-issue/m-p/5079704#M440205</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jojo Castro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-16T01:03:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MEMORY Utilization / Buffer Cache issue</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/memory-utilization-buffer-cache-issue/m-p/5079705#M440206</link>
      <description>&lt;BR /&gt;Jojo,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;AWR = Automated Workload Repository&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You need to get Oracle folk to run.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;WK</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 01:57:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/memory-utilization-buffer-cache-issue/m-p/5079705#M440206</guid>
      <dc:creator>whiteknight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-16T01:57:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MEMORY Utilization / Buffer Cache issue</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/memory-utilization-buffer-cache-issue/m-p/5079706#M440207</link>
      <description>Ok thanks to all!!!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 03:29:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/memory-utilization-buffer-cache-issue/m-p/5079706#M440207</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jojo Castro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-16T03:29:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MEMORY Utilization / Buffer Cache issue</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/memory-utilization-buffer-cache-issue/m-p/5079707#M440208</link>
      <description>Have understand the behavior on the issue. I already cleared the issue with my group.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 03:31:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/memory-utilization-buffer-cache-issue/m-p/5079707#M440208</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jojo Castro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-16T03:31:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

