<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Kernel optimization in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/kernel-optimization/m-p/2661248#M48445</link>
    <description>Hi Arturas,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;for the reason that a whole HP-UX- 11- kernel is only up to 20 MB, in my opinion it makes no sense to design a new kernel to save perhaps a few MB on a system with a Gig RAM. Another reason not to change the kernel is that you would have to reboot your system now and in the future ( if you need one of the deleted subsystems.... )and this makes no sense. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Allways stay on the bright side of life!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Peter</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 11:45:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Peter Kloetgen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-02-08T11:45:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Kernel optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/kernel-optimization/m-p/2661246#M48443</link>
      <description>I wonder what steps would be usefull/necessary to tune OS resources usage (RAM) when using L1000 HPUX11.00 as Oracle8i server. Is it worth to build kernel without some support (eg.FibreChannel,NFS/9000 subsystems if we're not using such at this time).&lt;BR /&gt;And what Oracle (32-bit or 64-bit) is better to use on 64-bit OS with 1GB RAM.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 11:31:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/kernel-optimization/m-p/2661246#M48443</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pocius Arturas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-02-08T11:31:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Kernel optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/kernel-optimization/m-p/2661247#M48444</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;since you are using as an oracle server, other than kernel parameters(shared memory, semaphores, ..)don't change anything.whatever comes default with the HP system is sufficient.&lt;BR /&gt;In my case both 32 bit and 64 bit version works well.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 11:43:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/kernel-optimization/m-p/2661247#M48444</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ravi_8</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-02-08T11:43:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Kernel optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/kernel-optimization/m-p/2661248#M48445</link>
      <description>Hi Arturas,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;for the reason that a whole HP-UX- 11- kernel is only up to 20 MB, in my opinion it makes no sense to design a new kernel to save perhaps a few MB on a system with a Gig RAM. Another reason not to change the kernel is that you would have to reboot your system now and in the future ( if you need one of the deleted subsystems.... )and this makes no sense. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Allways stay on the bright side of life!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Peter</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 11:45:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/kernel-optimization/m-p/2661248#M48445</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter Kloetgen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-02-08T11:45:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Kernel optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/kernel-optimization/m-p/2661249#M48446</link>
      <description>The other side of the question:&lt;BR /&gt;What advantages v. disadvantages I would get using 64-bit versus 32-bit Oracle in the system with limited RAM?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you in advance</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 13:00:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/kernel-optimization/m-p/2661249#M48446</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pocius Arturas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-02-08T13:00:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Kernel optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/kernel-optimization/m-p/2661250#M48447</link>
      <description>Well there may be other parms that are needed. You need to make sure nfiles,maxusers,maxuprc, maxsize_64bit,maxdsize_64bit are big enough to support your Oracle environment.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For specific to memory a very import parm is dbc_max_pct. I have mine set between 8 - 10. I have heard others have this up to 15. This is the % of buffer_cache the system will use of physicall memory.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And also go to 64bit now. If you every upgrade the memory and system grows you will be glad you are at 64bit for Oracle.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 14:16:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/kernel-optimization/m-p/2661250#M48447</guid>
      <dc:creator>Krishna Prasad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-02-08T14:16:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Kernel optimization</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/kernel-optimization/m-p/2661251#M48448</link>
      <description>Use ORacle 64 Bit beacuse 32 bit has shared memroy limitition only 1.7GB SGA available for 32 bit applications in default global window.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2002 15:17:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/kernel-optimization/m-p/2661251#M48448</guid>
      <dc:creator>Manohar Manne_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-02-08T15:17:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

