<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VM Host O/S OE Version in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vm-host-o-s-oe-version/m-p/5132814#M526152</link>
    <description>Thanks all</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 14:37:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Records Management</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-01T14:37:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VM Host O/S OE Version</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vm-host-o-s-oe-version/m-p/5132809#M526147</link>
      <description>Here's the setup...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have a rx2660 with Integrity VM. It has one core, and two VM guests. I have 11.23 FOE running on the host, and 11.31 EOE running on the two guests.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As I have only one core and one LTU for EOE, can I use the EOE on the host, rather than the FOE? I have read the virtualization licensing document that I found, but it really doesn't say. It talks about having to license the highest OE first, which I have done.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And, just to add to the confusion.. I'm starting the process to upgrade to IVM 4.0, which will also include bumping the VM host to 11.31. And I have copies of the new OE's, both base and virtual server. But VM software is part of the the new VSOE bundle (replaces EOE), which leads me to believe that I would use it on both the host and guests.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So to me it sounds like I would go from a host running 11.23 FOE and two guests running 11.31 EOE to everything running 11.31 VSOE. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is this right, or am I missing something?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:50:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vm-host-o-s-oe-version/m-p/5132809#M526147</guid>
      <dc:creator>Records Management</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-30T16:50:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VM Host O/S OE Version</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vm-host-o-s-oe-version/m-p/5132810#M526148</link>
      <description>As long as the system is covered by a support contract that includes software update (which I guess it does, or you wouldn't have got the DVDs for the new OE) then you have it correct.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All is explained in this letter:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://h20338.www2.hp.com/hpux11i/downloads/5992-4069.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://h20338.www2.hp.com/hpux11i/downloads/5992-4069.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Duncan</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:00:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vm-host-o-s-oe-version/m-p/5132810#M526148</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duncan Edmonstone</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-30T17:00:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VM Host O/S OE Version</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vm-host-o-s-oe-version/m-p/5132811#M526149</link>
      <description>Yes, the old EOE is on the support contract, which is why I could get the new VSOE.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But it really doesn't answer the question that if I have the proper licensing (1 core, 1 VSOE LTU, and 1 BOE LTU), can I use the VSOE on the VM host rather than the Base OE as well as on the two guests?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:11:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vm-host-o-s-oe-version/m-p/5132811#M526149</guid>
      <dc:creator>Records Management</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-30T17:11:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VM Host O/S OE Version</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vm-host-o-s-oe-version/m-p/5132812#M526150</link>
      <description>you can use the VS-OE on the Host, but just use teh Base-OE on the guests.&lt;BR /&gt;You certainly do NOT want to install such things as mirrordisk/ux, IVM etc on to your guests machines&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:29:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vm-host-o-s-oe-version/m-p/5132812#M526150</guid>
      <dc:creator>melvyn burnard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-30T17:29:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VM Host O/S OE Version</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vm-host-o-s-oe-version/m-p/5132813#M526151</link>
      <description>Virtualization licensing is explained in the following doc:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://h71028.www7.hp.com/ERC/downloads/4AA0-1803ENW.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://h71028.www7.hp.com/ERC/downloads/4AA0-1803ENW.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Whilst you don't want IVM or Mirrordisk, you may want Online JFS and Glanceplus Pak, so consider installing those components.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Duncan</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:06:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vm-host-o-s-oe-version/m-p/5132813#M526151</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duncan Edmonstone</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-09-30T18:06:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VM Host O/S OE Version</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vm-host-o-s-oe-version/m-p/5132814#M526152</link>
      <description>Thanks all</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 14:37:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vm-host-o-s-oe-version/m-p/5132814#M526152</guid>
      <dc:creator>Records Management</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-01T14:37:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

