<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: multiple IPs same NIC same subnet advisable? in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiple-ips-same-nic-same-subnet-advisable/m-p/4736293#M531121</link>
    <description>Just to correct Alzhy's misconception, you *can* configure the interface to a different subnet if your network infrastructure and networks admins do their portion of the task properly. Most modern blade servers if not all, support what-so-called VLAN trunking or VLAN Tagging, which enables running more than one network on any given physical interface. But is is no longer straight forward. One needs to work hand in hand with the network infrastructure people as the configuration is anything but trivial. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So, short answer, anything is possible but proceed with extreme caution.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:25:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mel Burslan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-01-10T23:25:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>multiple IPs same NIC same subnet advisable?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiple-ips-same-nic-same-subnet-advisable/m-p/4736291#M531119</link>
      <description>We've built 3 HP-UX 11.31 systems on 3 BL860c blades for our Oracle DBAs who have installed Oracle 11g RAC there.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Each blade has 4 onboard NICs (we'll add a mezzanine card later to add APA).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Per our Architect's specs, on each blade, we have:&lt;BR /&gt;IP 1 in 192.168.204.x subnet on lan0.&lt;BR /&gt;IP 2 in 10.xx.xx.xx subnet on lan1&lt;BR /&gt;IP 3 in 192.168.75.xx subnet on lan2&lt;BR /&gt;IP 4 in 192.168.75.xx subnet on lan2:801 &lt;BR /&gt;(this last "VIP" floating IP is automatically configured by Oracle RAC)&lt;BR /&gt;No IP on lan3&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Problem symptom: we have seen packet loss pinging IP3 on one system from another RAC node and IP4 (VIP floater) transferring to another node intermittently.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Basic question: is it advisable to allow Oracle to configure IP 4 on 192.178.75.xx network on lan2:801 in the same subnet as IP 3?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 19:54:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiple-ips-same-nic-same-subnet-advisable/m-p/4736291#M531119</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mike Patterson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-10T19:54:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiple IPs same NIC same subnet advisable?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiple-ips-same-nic-same-subnet-advisable/m-p/4736292#M531120</link>
      <description>"Basic question: is it advisable to allow Oracle to configure IP 4 on 192.178.75.xx network on lan2:801 in the same subnet as IP 3? "&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I don't think you can even assign a different LAN / network address to a VIP than its non-VIP physical's IP.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So yes.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Check your netmasks though.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:20:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiple-ips-same-nic-same-subnet-advisable/m-p/4736292#M531120</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alzhy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-10T20:20:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiple IPs same NIC same subnet advisable?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiple-ips-same-nic-same-subnet-advisable/m-p/4736293#M531121</link>
      <description>Just to correct Alzhy's misconception, you *can* configure the interface to a different subnet if your network infrastructure and networks admins do their portion of the task properly. Most modern blade servers if not all, support what-so-called VLAN trunking or VLAN Tagging, which enables running more than one network on any given physical interface. But is is no longer straight forward. One needs to work hand in hand with the network infrastructure people as the configuration is anything but trivial. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So, short answer, anything is possible but proceed with extreme caution.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:25:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiple-ips-same-nic-same-subnet-advisable/m-p/4736293#M531121</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mel Burslan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-10T23:25:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiple IPs same NIC same subnet advisable?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiple-ips-same-nic-same-subnet-advisable/m-p/4736294#M531122</link>
      <description>Mel,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am just folowings what our venerable Network Team told us.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So ye saying that if lan900 is 10.10.10.100, I can have lan900:1 as 192.168.10.100 ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yours truly.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:04:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiple-ips-same-nic-same-subnet-advisable/m-p/4736294#M531122</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alzhy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-11T13:04:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiple IPs same NIC same subnet advisable?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiple-ips-same-nic-same-subnet-advisable/m-p/4736295#M531123</link>
      <description>Hey;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;So ye saying that if lan900 is 10.10.10.100, I can have lan900:1 as 192.168.10.100 ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;No; that you can't have.  The multiplexed IPs have to be on the same subnet as the initial one assigned to the card.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Doug</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:42:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiple-ips-same-nic-same-subnet-advisable/m-p/4736295#M531123</guid>
      <dc:creator>Doug O'Leary</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-11T13:42:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiple IPs same NIC same subnet advisable?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiple-ips-same-nic-same-subnet-advisable/m-p/4736296#M531124</link>
      <description>That is what I thought too doug.. thanks.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Well Mell?</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:46:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiple-ips-same-nic-same-subnet-advisable/m-p/4736296#M531124</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alzhy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-11T13:46:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiple IPs same NIC same subnet advisable?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiple-ips-same-nic-same-subnet-advisable/m-p/4736297#M531125</link>
      <description>One most certainly can configure multiple IPs, in different IP subnets on top of the same physical NIC.  Heck, one can even configure multiple physical NICs with IPs in the same IP subnet, although it does lead to complications in getting traffic flowing where one may normally expect it to flow. (perhaps necessitating static route entries and/or manipulation of the ip_strong_es_model setting in ndd)</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 18:05:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/multiple-ips-same-nic-same-subnet-advisable/m-p/4736297#M531125</guid>
      <dc:creator>rick jones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-11T18:05:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

