<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Network capacity &amp;amp; performance in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/network-capacity-amp-performance/m-p/4256327#M540079</link>
    <description>Paul,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes, NNM is chargeable.  Did you look at gpm &amp;gt; Reports &amp;gt; Network Info &amp;gt; Network By Interface ?  That particular report gives you some real numbers  that you can use to compare idle vs load.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Pete</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:04:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Pete Randall</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-08-22T09:04:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Network capacity &amp; performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/network-capacity-amp-performance/m-p/4256326#M540078</link>
      <description>Hi.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have an oldish server using 100base=t cards but the switches around it have since been upgraded to 1000 base-t switches.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The servers are getting some memory and CPU upgrades shortly and ive suggested that the cards should also be changed to faster 1000 cards.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However Ive now been asked to demonstrate that there would be a performace increse from the new cards.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The bulk of the network traffic to this server is large batch file transfers to and from other syatems, and we have used APA to group 2 100 speed cards together to help the performance.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Netstat etc wont show me what %age utilized the current cards are. Nor will glance. Is there anything else I can use to show that at peak times this cards are a bottleneck?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Searching the net suggested network node manager but I think this is chargeable.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:08:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/network-capacity-amp-performance/m-p/4256326#M540078</guid>
      <dc:creator>Paul Condren</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-22T08:08:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Network capacity &amp; performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/network-capacity-amp-performance/m-p/4256327#M540079</link>
      <description>Paul,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes, NNM is chargeable.  Did you look at gpm &amp;gt; Reports &amp;gt; Network Info &amp;gt; Network By Interface ?  That particular report gives you some real numbers  that you can use to compare idle vs load.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Pete</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:04:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/network-capacity-amp-performance/m-p/4256327#M540079</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pete Randall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-22T09:04:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Network capacity &amp; performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/network-capacity-amp-performance/m-p/4256328#M540080</link>
      <description>Do a search of this forum for lan statistics.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;One relevant item is here:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1199612" target="_blank"&gt;http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1199612&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yes NNM is a purchasable item. $50k - $100k&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Glance is a great tool, actually a must have for HPUX.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;netstat and lanadmin can also be used to gather usage stats.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Of course you will see much greater performance with GigEther but only if you are stressing your current 200MB aggregate.  If you only push/pull low volumes then why waste the money.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Gather some stats over time, if you are anywhere near 100MB or 200MB / second then show the stats to the boss.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;With the upgrade of the Gig switches make sure you check on your handshaking.  AUTO never worked well with 100MB nics.  Lock then to 100FD.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:24:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/network-capacity-amp-performance/m-p/4256328#M540080</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tim Nelson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-08-22T13:24:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

