<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: lvmattachd and CPU time in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/lvmattachd-and-cpu-time/m-p/4745559#M548747</link>
    <description>lvmattachd&lt;BR /&gt;Introduced a new kernel daemon which will keep track of NOT_ATTACHED PVs (* Alternate PV links *)and attach them to the VG as soon as they become accessible. This will avoid the need to reactivate.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;so this daemon is keeping a watch on the PV links ..are there two many on this machine.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As you said no errors for any HW path switching doesn`t looks like a potential issue so far .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But it is constant 3 % CPU usage &amp;amp; how are&lt;BR /&gt;you measuring that top /glance.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any lvm patching done on this.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;Manix</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:49:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Manix</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-01-29T09:49:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>lvmattachd and CPU time</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/lvmattachd-and-cpu-time/m-p/4745558#M548746</link>
      <description>&lt;BR /&gt;lvmattached is using 3% of CPU time on a relatively quiet system.  I am using PVLINKS on this and other systems.  This is the only system that is showing lvmattachd as high CPU, even though it is a quieter system than the others.  No errors in syslog, EMS, etc.  All VG's and Physical volumes are showing no problems.  I know this is not high, but I'm concerned that this may be masking a potential issue.  &lt;BR /&gt;OS is HPUX 11.11</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 21:38:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/lvmattachd-and-cpu-time/m-p/4745558#M548746</guid>
      <dc:creator>Samuel Scott</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-28T21:38:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: lvmattachd and CPU time</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/lvmattachd-and-cpu-time/m-p/4745559#M548747</link>
      <description>lvmattachd&lt;BR /&gt;Introduced a new kernel daemon which will keep track of NOT_ATTACHED PVs (* Alternate PV links *)and attach them to the VG as soon as they become accessible. This will avoid the need to reactivate.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;so this daemon is keeping a watch on the PV links ..are there two many on this machine.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As you said no errors for any HW path switching doesn`t looks like a potential issue so far .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But it is constant 3 % CPU usage &amp;amp; how are&lt;BR /&gt;you measuring that top /glance.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any lvm patching done on this.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;Manix</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2011 09:49:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/lvmattachd-and-cpu-time/m-p/4745559#M548747</guid>
      <dc:creator>Manix</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-29T09:49:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

