<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Advice or best practice LVM and RAID in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/advice-or-best-practice-lvm-and-raid/m-p/4486819#M555802</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;sounds like you are running linux on a proliant with smartarray controller.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You are here in hp-ux forum, so consider to ask in linux or server forum.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However, the RAID10 config with multiple logical drive will be a good option.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 03:41:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Torsten.</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-08-27T03:41:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Advice or best practice LVM and RAID</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/advice-or-best-practice-lvm-and-raid/m-p/4486818#M555801</link>
      <description>Hello List,&lt;BR /&gt;I have a RHEL host that I will be connecting to a 5 RAID array. The array is capable of RAID 1,5,10,50. There are 5 300GB SAS disks.&lt;BR /&gt;The host will be running multiple databases 8 or 9 total that do not handle RAID5 so RAID5 is not an option.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What would be the best option for such a situation. As I said I have 5 300GB disks to work with. The way I see it these are my options. &lt;BR /&gt;1) Create two 300GB mirrors from 4 disks and use the fifth for a hot spare.&lt;BR /&gt;2) Create a 600GB RAID10 volume and use the 5th disk as the hot spare. &lt;BR /&gt;I myself do not see a better option than the RAID10 but I would like to hear some feedback.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also in the case I do use a RAID10, in terms of           &lt;BR /&gt;performance...Is it suggested to create multiple logical volumes on the RAID10 volume and put each database on its own logical volume? Or is it better to create a single logical volume and simply chop the databases up by directories under the single logical volume?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would like to have more disks to work with..&lt;BR /&gt;in fact they may buy 3 more..So for my questions above, how would having 8 disks instead of 5 change the suggested layout.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you in advance.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 03:25:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/advice-or-best-practice-lvm-and-raid/m-p/4486818#M555801</guid>
      <dc:creator>TechC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-27T03:25:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Advice or best practice LVM and RAID</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/advice-or-best-practice-lvm-and-raid/m-p/4486819#M555802</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;sounds like you are running linux on a proliant with smartarray controller.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You are here in hp-ux forum, so consider to ask in linux or server forum.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However, the RAID10 config with multiple logical drive will be a good option.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 03:41:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/advice-or-best-practice-lvm-and-raid/m-p/4486819#M555802</guid>
      <dc:creator>Torsten.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-08-27T03:41:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

