<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VxFS performance measure in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vxfs-performance-measure/m-p/4372260#M560468</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;There is some doc about io performance, maybe the better is&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://docs.hp.com/en/7779/commonMisconfig.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://docs.hp.com/en/7779/commonMisconfig.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;but you could also improve some way the performance in mounting the fs. &lt;BR /&gt;There is a good wp about mounting jfs/ direct IO and oracle normaly is here...but impossible to take it&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://h71019.www7.hp.com/ERC/downloads/4AA1-9839ENW.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://h71019.www7.hp.com/ERC/downloads/4AA1-9839ENW.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So my old one is in attach&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope it helps</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:08:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>smatador</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-03-05T11:08:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VxFS performance measure</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vxfs-performance-measure/m-p/4372259#M560467</link>
      <description>I am reading 3GB file using Direct I/O  and buffered I/O. I expected direct I/O performance to be better, but I got equal performance in both the cases. I read the files with block size 1MB for each read. My file system block size is 8kb. I verified un-buffered I/O in case of Direct I/O using a tool.&lt;BR /&gt;Using vxtunefs changed max_buf_data_size = 65536.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Please tell me any think else I should do to improve Ditect I/O performance.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vxfs-performance-measure/m-p/4372259#M560467</guid>
      <dc:creator>Venkatesh marisamy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-05T09:50:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VxFS performance measure</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vxfs-performance-measure/m-p/4372260#M560468</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;There is some doc about io performance, maybe the better is&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://docs.hp.com/en/7779/commonMisconfig.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://docs.hp.com/en/7779/commonMisconfig.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;but you could also improve some way the performance in mounting the fs. &lt;BR /&gt;There is a good wp about mounting jfs/ direct IO and oracle normaly is here...but impossible to take it&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://h71019.www7.hp.com/ERC/downloads/4AA1-9839ENW.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://h71019.www7.hp.com/ERC/downloads/4AA1-9839ENW.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So my old one is in attach&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope it helps</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:08:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vxfs-performance-measure/m-p/4372260#M560468</guid>
      <dc:creator>smatador</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-05T11:08:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

