<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: poor Samba performance in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/poor-samba-performance/m-p/3482706#M562164</link>
    <description>One setting I use that improved performance in smb.conf:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;        keepalive = 0&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Are you running winbind?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have seen performance issues when the samba share is also a NFS share....&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Rgds...Geoff</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:40:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Geoff Wild</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-02-10T08:40:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>poor Samba performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/poor-samba-performance/m-p/3482703#M562161</link>
      <description>Hello &lt;BR /&gt;following situtation:&lt;BR /&gt;Samba works well for us for many years. Now we found it tooks too long to copy a new fileset over an existing fileset on our server (HP-UX 11.0 L1000).&lt;BR /&gt;Our Sample: &lt;BR /&gt;2,6GB - 77705 Files within 2443 Folders&lt;BR /&gt;My copy test:&lt;BR /&gt;xcopy /S /E /I /Y S:\home\programme\v5\B14\intel_a D:\tmp\cpy\verz&lt;BR /&gt;From Server (Samba) to XPworkstation (my PC):&lt;BR /&gt;30 Min for copy and 30 Min for copy over existing &lt;BR /&gt;Same Values with copy from my workstaion to a other windows (XP) box &lt;BR /&gt;Same copy to a samba share:&lt;BR /&gt;150 Min !!!! (4 tests 151,205,148,150)&lt;BR /&gt;Have made tests with our server and a HP C3750 Workstation (because ist easyser to test).&lt;BR /&gt;Samba config attached. Nobody is working on this Workstation.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have tested it with samba 2.2.a and now upgraded to 2.2.l (same thing). &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have found following with google: &lt;BR /&gt;what is the bottleneck ?? CPU, MEM, Network, DISK, swap space??&lt;BR /&gt;And thats my question have checked this things everthing seams ok:&lt;BR /&gt;top:&lt;BR /&gt;System: ecshp033                                      Wed Feb  9 16:56:34 2005&lt;BR /&gt;Load averages: 1.60, 1.56, 1.37&lt;BR /&gt;104 processes: 100 sleeping, 4 running&lt;BR /&gt;Cpu states:&lt;BR /&gt; LOAD   USER   NICE    SYS   IDLE  BLOCK  SWAIT   INTR   SSYS&lt;BR /&gt; 1.60  84.0%   0.0%   2.4%  13.6%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Memory: 94916K (37888K) real, 83104K (37052K) virtual, 1479996K free  Page# 1/5&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; TTY    PID USERNAME PRI NI   SIZE    RES STATE    TIME %WCPU  %CPU COMMAND&lt;BR /&gt;  ?   23817 root     233 20 12420K  7936K run     17:06 84.12 83.97 smbd&lt;BR /&gt;  ?      31 root     152 20  4864K     0K run      3:59  0.61  0.61 vxfsd&lt;BR /&gt;  ?    1204 daemon   154 20 62040K 14980K sleep  108:46  0.32  0.32 X&lt;BR /&gt;  ?   23803 root     154 20  3992K   868K sleep    0:00  0.21  0.21 nmbd&lt;BR /&gt;# swapinfo -t&lt;BR /&gt;             Kb      Kb      Kb   PCT  START/      Kb&lt;BR /&gt;TYPE      AVAIL    USED    FREE  USED   LIMIT RESERVE  PRI  NAME&lt;BR /&gt;dev     4194304       0 4194304    0%       0       -    1  /dev/vg00/lvol2&lt;BR /&gt;reserve       -  137484 -137484&lt;BR /&gt;memory  1460532  137848 1322684    9%&lt;BR /&gt;total   5654836  275332 5379504    5%       -       0    -&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# sar -d 1 10&lt;BR /&gt;HP-UX ecshp033 B.11.00 U 9000/785    02/09/05&lt;BR /&gt;Average    c3t6d0    9.49    0.50      26     406    3.91    5.53&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Network: nobody is working there (and read is fast).&lt;BR /&gt;My conclusion: Samba is slow&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is that so or&lt;BR /&gt;What can I do?? Settings?&lt;BR /&gt;Any help welcome thx in advance&lt;BR /&gt;Erich</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 01:48:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/poor-samba-performance/m-p/3482703#M562161</guid>
      <dc:creator>Erich Z</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-10T01:48:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: poor Samba performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/poor-samba-performance/m-p/3482704#M562162</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It doesn't look like you have a memory or cpu problem.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Has anything changed in the network?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What is the FTP speed to and from the server?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Bob</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 03:59:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/poor-samba-performance/m-p/3482704#M562162</guid>
      <dc:creator>B. Hulst</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-10T03:59:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: poor Samba performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/poor-samba-performance/m-p/3482705#M562163</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;Sorry have forgotten. Normal 100Mbit performance in our Network. Have made the same test with a 217M file (takes 1:10 in all directions =&amp;gt; sampletime should be about 14 min - the overhead to 30 does not matter a real problem are the two extra hours). &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm not thinking its a direct networkproblem and its not depending on overwriting also not on the used hardware. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I think the troubles source is the handling of many smal files with samba - and I am hoping there is a positve setting.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;mfg Erich&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;P.S. I think within this group are the samba exprerts - for me samba and Cifs is the same</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 07:35:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/poor-samba-performance/m-p/3482705#M562163</guid>
      <dc:creator>Erich Z</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-10T07:35:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: poor Samba performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/poor-samba-performance/m-p/3482706#M562164</link>
      <description>One setting I use that improved performance in smb.conf:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;        keepalive = 0&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Are you running winbind?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have seen performance issues when the samba share is also a NFS share....&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Rgds...Geoff</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:40:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/poor-samba-performance/m-p/3482706#M562164</guid>
      <dc:creator>Geoff Wild</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-10T08:40:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: poor Samba performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/poor-samba-performance/m-p/3482707#M562165</link>
      <description>Hello, &lt;BR /&gt;Have checked keepalive - seems to be no difference because set on our server (with socket option so_keepalive) and not set as you have seen on our testbox. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;winbind is not running.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;NFS does not matter because on the server there are many NFS shares shares (but these are submounts to the Windows share) on my testworkstation there are only NFS mounts but no exported shares.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;mfg Erich</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:12:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/poor-samba-performance/m-p/3482707#M562165</guid>
      <dc:creator>Erich Z</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-10T09:12:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: poor Samba performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/poor-samba-performance/m-p/3482708#M562166</link>
      <description>You might want to measure performance to see what the real problem is.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;copying a large number of files can cause kernel issues. I'm attaching some perf monitor scripts, given to me by HP Support(no warranty) and made to work correctly in the background by me(again no warranty). They should help you identify the problem.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also, a network card getting ready to fail will sometimes have slowdowns. You would notice this on logins and other network transfers.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also a problem with Fiber cards/patching and or the vxfs filesysetm i/o hang would impact Samba peformance.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Yeah, its a fishing expedition. Sorry about that. Consider these two patches if relavent to your system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;From a current support call I have open after an i/o hang. rp5450 system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;PHCO_29379 1.0 LVM commands cumulative patch&lt;BR /&gt;PHKL_26743 1.0 LVM Cumulative Patch&lt;BR /&gt;PHKL_28984 1.0 Fibre Channel Mass Storage Patch&lt;BR /&gt;PHKL_29365 1.0 SCSI IO Cumulative Patch&lt;BR /&gt;PHKL_29539 1.0 PDC_SCSI_PARMS,iCOD,vPars,IPMI,OLA/R&lt;BR /&gt;PHKL_29685 1.0 SCSI Ultra160 Cumulative Patch&lt;BR /&gt;PHKL_25506 1.0 asyncio driver patch&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Except for the FCMS and asyncio driver patches installed, there are&lt;BR /&gt;later HP recommended versions for all of the above.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Recommend updating system with the following patches (plus any patch&lt;BR /&gt;dependencies needed with these):&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;PHSS_28509 s700_800 11.11 Tachyon TL Fibre Channel Driver Patch &lt;BR /&gt;PHKL_32235 s700_800 11.11 VxFS cumulative patch for three way deadlock &lt;BR /&gt;PHCO_30698 s700_800 11.11 LVM commands cumulative patch; LVM OLR &lt;BR /&gt;PHKL_31216 s700_800 11.11 LVM Cumulative Patch; LVM OLR; SLVM 16 Node &lt;BR /&gt;PHKL_30510 s700_800 11.11 SCSI IO Cumulative Patch &lt;BR /&gt;PHKL_30523 s700_800 11.11 PDC_SCSI_PARMS,iCOD,vPars,IPMI,OLA/R &lt;BR /&gt;PHKL_30511 s700_800 11.11 SCSI Ultra160 Cumulative Patch &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:43:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/poor-samba-performance/m-p/3482708#M562166</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-10T09:43:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

