<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Load balancing on FC HBA in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/load-balancing-on-fc-hba/m-p/4280383#M564802</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have many storage virtual disks presented via 2 SAN switches to a RP4400 running HP-UX 11.11 and using 2 FC HBA (each HBA connected to a different SAN switch)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Because of performance issues, we installed in the server 2 new FC HBA, so we have in total 4 new FC HBA (2 HBA connected to the same switch.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The question is how to implement load balancing on the four FC HBA to increase performance, and this for:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; - Volume Groups contaning lvols using one PVG with strict allocation policy&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; - Volume Groups without PVG and strict allocation policy</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:14:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MohamedTaher</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-10-03T10:14:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Load balancing on FC HBA</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/load-balancing-on-fc-hba/m-p/4280383#M564802</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have many storage virtual disks presented via 2 SAN switches to a RP4400 running HP-UX 11.11 and using 2 FC HBA (each HBA connected to a different SAN switch)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Because of performance issues, we installed in the server 2 new FC HBA, so we have in total 4 new FC HBA (2 HBA connected to the same switch.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The question is how to implement load balancing on the four FC HBA to increase performance, and this for:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; - Volume Groups contaning lvols using one PVG with strict allocation policy&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; - Volume Groups without PVG and strict allocation policy</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:14:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/load-balancing-on-fc-hba/m-p/4280383#M564802</guid>
      <dc:creator>MohamedTaher</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-03T10:14:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load balancing on FC HBA</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/load-balancing-on-fc-hba/m-p/4280384#M564803</link>
      <description>You probably have pvlinks on the box, but that really doesn't load balance.  More like failover to other HBA if one goes down.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You could install software that allows for more verbose load balancing - SecurePath is the HP product.  We're an EMC storage shop, so we use PowerPath for load balancing.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When you get to 11.31 it seems that SecurePath is part of the kernel - but that is for another thread.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Just a thought,&lt;BR /&gt;Rita&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:59:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/load-balancing-on-fc-hba/m-p/4280384#M564803</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rita C Workman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-03T10:59:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load balancing on FC HBA</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/load-balancing-on-fc-hba/m-p/4280385#M564804</link>
      <description>Some clue as to the sort of disk array you have would help here... You almost imply that this is an EVA of some sort without explicitly stating that...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Duncan</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:59:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/load-balancing-on-fc-hba/m-p/4280385#M564804</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duncan Edmonstone</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-03T11:59:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load balancing on FC HBA</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/load-balancing-on-fc-hba/m-p/4280386#M564805</link>
      <description>yes that's right it's an EVA ;-)</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 12:04:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/load-balancing-on-fc-hba/m-p/4280386#M564805</guid>
      <dc:creator>MohamedTaher</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-03T12:04:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load balancing on FC HBA</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/load-balancing-on-fc-hba/m-p/4280387#M564806</link>
      <description>Then secure path is what you need to purchase.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;With out it your only option is to manually round robin the pv-links/alternate paths.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;On my older systems without any secure path I stagger the primaries over all 4 paths.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;e.g. &lt;BR /&gt;dev1 on path1&lt;BR /&gt;dev2 on path2&lt;BR /&gt;dev3 on path3&lt;BR /&gt;dev4 on path4&lt;BR /&gt;dev5 on path1&lt;BR /&gt;dev6 on path2&lt;BR /&gt;etc..&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you wish to be more effective then monitor the io usage of each of your lvols and balance that way and review on a weekly/monthly basis.  Something is better than nothing.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 14:55:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/load-balancing-on-fc-hba/m-p/4280387#M564806</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tim Nelson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-10-03T14:55:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

