<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ndd accuracy vs. netstat accuracy in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ndd-accuracy-vs-netstat-accuracy/m-p/3336228#M568201</link>
    <description>We are using BMC's Patrol for UNIX Perform/Predict, v6.6.10,  to get performance data.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Mott Given</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 09:18:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mott Given</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-07-20T09:18:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ndd accuracy vs. netstat accuracy</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ndd-accuracy-vs-netstat-accuracy/m-p/3336226#M568199</link>
      <description>We are using a 3rd party product to give performance and capacity planning information on our HP-UX servers.  The product appears to rely heavily on the "netstat" command to give its network info.  I thought that I had heard somewhere that the netstat command had been replaced by "ndd" in HP-UX 11.00 and up, and that the netstat output was no longer 100% accurate.  I can't find anything to confirm that ndd should be used instead of netstat to get network info and statistics.  Does anyone have any info to confirm or deny this idea?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Mott Given</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 07:56:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ndd-accuracy-vs-netstat-accuracy/m-p/3336226#M568199</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mott Given</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-07-20T07:56:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ndd accuracy vs. netstat accuracy</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ndd-accuracy-vs-netstat-accuracy/m-p/3336227#M568200</link>
      <description>Strange, as far as I know, ndd is for getting/setting network parameters - not stats.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;netstat should be fine as far as I know.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;BTW - which tool are you using?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Rgds...Geoff</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 09:15:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ndd-accuracy-vs-netstat-accuracy/m-p/3336227#M568200</guid>
      <dc:creator>Geoff Wild</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-07-20T09:15:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ndd accuracy vs. netstat accuracy</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ndd-accuracy-vs-netstat-accuracy/m-p/3336228#M568201</link>
      <description>We are using BMC's Patrol for UNIX Perform/Predict, v6.6.10,  to get performance data.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Mott Given</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 09:18:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ndd-accuracy-vs-netstat-accuracy/m-p/3336228#M568201</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mott Given</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-07-20T09:18:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ndd accuracy vs. netstat accuracy</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ndd-accuracy-vs-netstat-accuracy/m-p/3336229#M568202</link>
      <description>Don't know about using ndd for stats but netstat -rn is definitely not working as well as it should as far as the stats of packets sent and received goes in our 11.0 with very few patches.  Perhaps if we had all the patches then it would be happier but ours is a production network serving 1.6 million subscribers and the prevailing attitude is if it aint broke enough to annoy the customers then don't fix it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Ron</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 10:29:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ndd-accuracy-vs-netstat-accuracy/m-p/3336229#M568202</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ron Kinner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-07-20T10:29:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ndd accuracy vs. netstat accuracy</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ndd-accuracy-vs-netstat-accuracy/m-p/3336230#M568203</link>
      <description>I think user is talking about using following ndd parameter.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ndd -get /dev/tcp tcp_status/udp_status&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;the netstat uses &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;netstat -an &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I do know, if there is difference in both. I think that both report the same thing.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Anil</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 12:00:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ndd-accuracy-vs-netstat-accuracy/m-p/3336230#M568203</guid>
      <dc:creator>RAC_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-07-20T12:00:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ndd accuracy vs. netstat accuracy</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ndd-accuracy-vs-netstat-accuracy/m-p/3336231#M568204</link>
      <description>the 10.20 command _nettune_ is what ndd replaces in 11.0 and up, not netstat.  netstat statistics in 11.0 and later should be just as accurate as they were in the past :)</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2004 22:30:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ndd-accuracy-vs-netstat-accuracy/m-p/3336231#M568204</guid>
      <dc:creator>rick jones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-07-20T22:30:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

