<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NIC Performance in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/nic-performance/m-p/3059592#M575174</link>
    <description>Both the core (btlan3) and add-on (btlan5) NIC's use Digital 2114X 100BT chipsets.  Their performance should be virtually identical. The only chance for performance differences would be from the add-on card being in a more/less capable PCI bus and perhaps not having to share any PCI bandwidth with other devices.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also, when you upgrade to 11i (11.11 - we all are going to do that soon right?-) FCS of 11.0 was 1997...) you will find that btlan3 and btlan5 (along with btlan6 and btlan4) have all been merged into one "btlan" driver.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2003 16:32:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rick jones</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-09-02T16:32:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NIC Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/nic-performance/m-p/3059587#M575169</link>
      <description>Hi, I've got an N-4000 running HP-UX 11.0&lt;BR /&gt;Are there any performance implications of changing from HP PCI 10/100Base-TX Core (using btlan3 driver) to HP A5230A/B5509BA PCI 10/100Base-TX Addon (using btlan5 driver)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've been experiencing source quench messages and have just disabled the parameter with ndd.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks in advance</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:04:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/nic-performance/m-p/3059587#M575169</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pete Kelly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-08-29T10:04:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NIC Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/nic-performance/m-p/3059588#M575170</link>
      <description>Hello Pete,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; You should make sure you have the latest driver for the add on btlan5 PCI card. There are some known card hangs with that driver.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The latest patch is PHNE_25580.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The source quench can be disabled w/ out any side affects, but it may not be related to your issues. Check the lanadmin statistics for that card and the netstat -s statistics. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you want detailed information about the fields in netsetat check out ftp site listed in this post:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,,0x393f63f96280d711abdc0090277a778c,00.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,,0x393f63f96280d711abdc0090277a778c,00.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope this helps,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Todd</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:06:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/nic-performance/m-p/3059588#M575170</guid>
      <dc:creator>Todd Whitcher</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-08-29T11:06:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NIC Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/nic-performance/m-p/3059589#M575171</link>
      <description>Hi Todd,&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for the update. My main concern is whether the Addon card will be quicker than the PCI Core card. Or will the performance be the same?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:50:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/nic-performance/m-p/3059589#M575171</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pete Kelly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-08-29T11:50:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NIC Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/nic-performance/m-p/3059590#M575172</link>
      <description>I don't think you are going to notice any massive performance bump.  I have a similar setup on L class boxes, and ran large file transfers through our add in and then the built in.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The time difference was hardly noticeable, but the add in cards were a little quicker.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;With current patching and good drivers, 100 BaseT is 100 BaseT.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Several factors contributed to fuzziness.  The add in card was on a faster Cisco backbone, but shared band width with about 30 other servers. The built in card was on a Cisco 2900 switch sharing band width only with two other HP-UX servers.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Fair test.  Don't know.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I would not expect dramatic improvement.  For dramatic improvement, I'm purchasing 1000 BaseT cards.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:58:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/nic-performance/m-p/3059590#M575172</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-08-29T11:58:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NIC Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/nic-performance/m-p/3059591#M575173</link>
      <description>&lt;BR /&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There wouldn't be no improvement in performance(speed) as both the cards are 10/100 base.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;installing QPK patch bundle(from support plus media) may avoid the error you are getting (source quench)</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:05:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/nic-performance/m-p/3059591#M575173</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ravi_8</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-08-29T13:05:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NIC Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/nic-performance/m-p/3059592#M575174</link>
      <description>Both the core (btlan3) and add-on (btlan5) NIC's use Digital 2114X 100BT chipsets.  Their performance should be virtually identical. The only chance for performance differences would be from the add-on card being in a more/less capable PCI bus and perhaps not having to share any PCI bandwidth with other devices.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also, when you upgrade to 11i (11.11 - we all are going to do that soon right?-) FCS of 11.0 was 1997...) you will find that btlan3 and btlan5 (along with btlan6 and btlan4) have all been merged into one "btlan" driver.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2003 16:32:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/nic-performance/m-p/3059592#M575174</guid>
      <dc:creator>rick jones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-09-02T16:32:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

