<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: IP forwarding in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ip-forwarding/m-p/2793050#M582069</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;let's start analysing.&lt;BR /&gt;When you add two network card in the server and&lt;BR /&gt;assign two IP addresses belonging to two different subnets. Two route entries for these&lt;BR /&gt;subnets with the respective interface IP addresses as the gateway will added by default. &lt;BR /&gt;For example if you have ip addresses 10.0.0.1 and 20.0.0.1 assigned to your server. These routes will be added to your server automatically.&lt;BR /&gt;network 10.0.0.0 gateway 10.0.0.1&lt;BR /&gt;network 20.0.0.0 gateway 20.0.0.1&lt;BR /&gt;you can add redundant route for 10.0.0.0 . But the first entry for 10.0.0.0 in routing table&lt;BR /&gt;will only active. &lt;BR /&gt;Now assume that your lan cable is unplugged from 10.0.0.1 card.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1)If Dead gateway detection is present , server will be still able to get ICMP reply from 10.0.0.1 so will not switchover to redundant route.&lt;BR /&gt;2)If Dead gateway detection is not present&lt;BR /&gt;server will stick to the primary gateway and&lt;BR /&gt;will return network unreachable messages.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SO I don't think your plan will succeed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;regards,&lt;BR /&gt;U.SivaKumar&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2002 04:05:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>U.SivaKumar_2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-08-24T04:05:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IP forwarding</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ip-forwarding/m-p/2793048#M582067</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Let us assume IP FWD is enabled on my servers and I have two ip addressess ( different subnet, let us say subnet A and subnet B ) configured. Subnet B is down. Host A wants to send data to host B using subnet B.&lt;BR /&gt;          Sub A&lt;BR /&gt;Host A &amp;lt;-------------------&amp;gt;  Host B&lt;BR /&gt;          Sub B&lt;BR /&gt;       &amp;lt;-------------------&amp;gt;  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What happens now? Because Sub B is down the host A will route the packets using Sub A? Is this the expected behaviour? Or host A should say host B is not reachable by Sub B network? Help.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2002 17:34:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ip-forwarding/m-p/2793048#M582067</guid>
      <dc:creator>SAM_24</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-08-23T17:34:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP forwarding</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ip-forwarding/m-p/2793049#M582068</link>
      <description>Usual networking answer:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It depends.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What do the routing tables of the forwarding host look like?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;IF it uses static routing and it has a default route back through A then you will have a routing loop and the packet will be passed backed and forth  forever (actually until the ttl drops to 0 when the packet will be discarded.)&lt;BR /&gt;If it doesn't have a default route then it may drop the packet on the floor or send back a network unreachable message depending on how it is configured.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If it is using a dynamic routing table then it may actually figure out another way to get there but if this were the case and Host A was also involved with the dynamic routing then Host A would know the packet couldn't get there and wouldn't even bother sending it to the forwarder.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Ron</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2002 17:56:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ip-forwarding/m-p/2793049#M582068</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ron Kinner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-08-23T17:56:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IP forwarding</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ip-forwarding/m-p/2793050#M582069</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;let's start analysing.&lt;BR /&gt;When you add two network card in the server and&lt;BR /&gt;assign two IP addresses belonging to two different subnets. Two route entries for these&lt;BR /&gt;subnets with the respective interface IP addresses as the gateway will added by default. &lt;BR /&gt;For example if you have ip addresses 10.0.0.1 and 20.0.0.1 assigned to your server. These routes will be added to your server automatically.&lt;BR /&gt;network 10.0.0.0 gateway 10.0.0.1&lt;BR /&gt;network 20.0.0.0 gateway 20.0.0.1&lt;BR /&gt;you can add redundant route for 10.0.0.0 . But the first entry for 10.0.0.0 in routing table&lt;BR /&gt;will only active. &lt;BR /&gt;Now assume that your lan cable is unplugged from 10.0.0.1 card.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1)If Dead gateway detection is present , server will be still able to get ICMP reply from 10.0.0.1 so will not switchover to redundant route.&lt;BR /&gt;2)If Dead gateway detection is not present&lt;BR /&gt;server will stick to the primary gateway and&lt;BR /&gt;will return network unreachable messages.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SO I don't think your plan will succeed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;regards,&lt;BR /&gt;U.SivaKumar&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2002 04:05:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ip-forwarding/m-p/2793050#M582069</guid>
      <dc:creator>U.SivaKumar_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-08-24T04:05:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

