<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Checking lanic status ! in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/checking-lanic-status/m-p/2726481#M584907</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2002 12:15:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Johan Gjestvang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-05-21T12:15:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Checking lanic status !</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/checking-lanic-status/m-p/2726477#M584903</link>
      <description>Hi !&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In my last issue, I had the doubt,if the information with the landamin utility and networks commands show some hardware problem with the lan1.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# lanscan&lt;BR /&gt;Hardware Station        Crd Hdw   Net-Interface  NM  MAC       HP-DLPI DLPI&lt;BR /&gt;Path     Address        In# State NamePPA        ID  Type      Support Mjr#&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;0/44.1   0x080009D01C06 1   UP    lan1 snap1     2   ETHER     Yes     119&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For that i attach all the information about my lanics, for check the diference between the lanics.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Aclaration&lt;BR /&gt;----------&lt;BR /&gt;The lan0 is a lanic that i don't use for connection to my server. I only use the lan1 and lan2. The lan1 is 10 baset lanic and lan2 is a 10/100 baset lanic.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;**Excract of my file /etc/rc.config.d/netconf&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;INTERFACE_NAME[1]=lan1&lt;BR /&gt;IP_ADDRESS[1]=130.10.17.8&lt;BR /&gt;SUBNET_MASK[1]=255.255.0.0&lt;BR /&gt;BROADCAST_ADDRESS[1]=130.10.255.255&lt;BR /&gt;INTERFACE_STATE[1]=up&lt;BR /&gt;DHCP_ENABLE[1]=0&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;INTERFACE_NAME[2]=lan2&lt;BR /&gt;IP_ADDRESS[2]=130.10.16.8&lt;BR /&gt;SUBNET_MASK[2]=255.255.0.0&lt;BR /&gt;BROADCAST_ADDRESS[2]=130.10.255.255&lt;BR /&gt;INTERFACE_STATE[2]=up&lt;BR /&gt;DHCP_ENABLE[2]=0 &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I made the test with linkloop command:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# linkloop -i 1 0x080009D01C06&lt;BR /&gt;Link connectivity to LAN station: 0x080009D01C06&lt;BR /&gt; -- OK&lt;BR /&gt;# linkloop -i 2 0x00108318D721&lt;BR /&gt;Link connectivity to LAN station: 0x00108318D721&lt;BR /&gt; -- OK&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Both lanics check good. Could be only a problem in the speed of my switch ?.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I think that on the server all is ok. So that i could discard the server and make test on the switch.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Best Regards !</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2002 13:30:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/checking-lanic-status/m-p/2726477#M584903</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ivan Azuara</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-05-17T13:30:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Checking lanic status !</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/checking-lanic-status/m-p/2726478#M584904</link>
      <description>Looks to me like you have two seperate interfaces configured in the same IP subnet... this isn't really supported as the IP stack doesn't know which card to route traffic out of... Is there a reason for having two interfaces on the same subnet?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Duncan</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2002 13:35:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/checking-lanic-status/m-p/2726478#M584904</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duncan Edmonstone</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-05-17T13:35:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Checking lanic status !</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/checking-lanic-status/m-p/2726479#M584905</link>
      <description>Ivan,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As stated by Duncan, both lan1 and lan2 share the same subnet and it will make the system to be confused while using the default gateway. You will need to get rid of one.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-Sri&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2002 16:06:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/checking-lanic-status/m-p/2726479#M584905</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sridhar Bhaskarla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-05-17T16:06:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Checking lanic status !</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/checking-lanic-status/m-p/2726480#M584906</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You can either get rid of one interface (as mentioned by the rest) or you can split your network into two separate class-C subnets:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Local Area Network 1: 130.10.17.0/24 or 130.10.17.0/255.255.255.0&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Local Area Network 2: 130.10.16.0/24 or 130.10.16.0/255.255.255.0&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;With each NIC card on a separate class-C subnet, your network connectivity will work, provided you specify the correct netmask for each NIC interface in /etc/rc.config.d/netconf along with the correct default route.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope this helps. Regards.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Steven Sim Kok Leong</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2002 01:12:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/checking-lanic-status/m-p/2726480#M584906</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven Sim Kok Leong</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-05-18T01:12:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Checking lanic status !</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/checking-lanic-status/m-p/2726481#M584907</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2002 12:15:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/checking-lanic-status/m-p/2726481#M584907</guid>
      <dc:creator>Johan Gjestvang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-05-21T12:15:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

