<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VxVM lousy syncing rate in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vxvm-lousy-syncing-rate/m-p/3852159#M612231</link>
    <description>Ralph,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I actually had several environments 11.11 rooted with VxVM a few years ago (2002 to be exact) and I must say VxVM integration within HP-UX is the best that I've seen..&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The manuals on 3.5M under 11.11 are testament to how HP had planned VxVM to be its preferred Volume Manager.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The reason I stick with LVM is that there are already well entrenched LVM based OS disk recovery procedures that I did not want to risk overhauling -- specially that I was the only VxVM "expert" in the team... &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Will let you know as soon as I'm done with my 11.23 adventures... and VxVM 4.1 which reportedly makes obsolete the requisite "rootdg" diskgroup...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:59:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alzhy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-08-30T09:59:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VxVM lousy syncing rate</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vxvm-lousy-syncing-rate/m-p/3852155#M612227</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;Hello,&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;although my observation is drawn from a Solaris box which has root disks under VxVM control&lt;BR /&gt;and maybe thus not directly comparable to an HP-UX box with VxVM root disks.&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Btw, is anyone of you using the latter at all?&lt;BR /&gt;I am very keen to hear about your experience with VxVM rootability under HP-UX because I have only access to this under Solaris.&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;I need to revise my recovery/backup scripts&lt;BR /&gt;as I am not satisfied with the performance&lt;BR /&gt;(although this may be a minor issue in that context)&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;Apart from using VxVM snapshots,&lt;BR /&gt;which unfortunately I cannot use because I haven't got enough free blocks from the free disk pool to create a snapshot volume that would hold the entire var volume,&lt;BR /&gt;the officially propageted procedure for taking online backups of mirrored volumes (i.e. in VxVM Admin Guide) is the following:&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;1. disociate the mirror plex from the volume to backup&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;# vxplex -g rootdg dis rootvol-01&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;2. make a temporary volume to associate the freed plex&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;# vxmake -g rootdg -U gen vol backvol plex=rootvol-01&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;3. start temporary volume&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# vxvol -g rootdg  start backvol&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;4. perform fs check&lt;BR /&gt;(n.b. Solaris allows only their UFS for root slices/volumes, so you would probably run an fsck -F vxfs here instead)&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;# fsck -F ufs /dev/vx/rdsk/rootdg/backvol&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;5. backup&lt;BR /&gt;(n.b. usually on Solaris you do an ufsdump to tape, but I don't have attached tape drives on these boxes why I dump to a remote host)&lt;BR /&gt;  &lt;BR /&gt;# ufsdump 0f - /dev/vx/rdsk/rootdg/backvol|remsh remhost 'cat &amp;gt;/var/tmp/rdump/dumpedhost_rootvol.20060828'&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;6. stop temporary backup volume&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;# vxvol -g rootdg stop backvol&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;7. also disociate plex from backvol&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;# vxplex -g rootdg dis rootvol-01&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;8. re-attach plex to original volume&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;# vxplex -g rootdg att rootvol rootvol-01&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;9. remove temporary backvol&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;# vxedit -g rootdg rm backvol&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;While this may work fine for the relatively small root volume the time the syncing requires between steps 8-9 (progress could be followed by vxtask) becomes prohibitive for large volumes.&lt;BR /&gt;And I am not sure whether the removal of the temporary backvol may take place before the syncing is finished.&lt;BR /&gt;I would assume yes because the plex'es content hasn't changed.&lt;BR /&gt;  &lt;BR /&gt;For instance the syncing for a 60 GB home volume took longer than 35 hours!!!&lt;BR /&gt;I have never experienced such a slow syncing with LVM.&lt;BR /&gt;This may of course be partly owed by the single root disk controller whith what the FSC hardware was shipped&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;# vxprint -dspvg rootdg&lt;BR /&gt;TY NAME         ASSOC        KSTATE   LENGTH   PLOFFS   STATE    TUTIL0  PUTIL0&lt;BR /&gt;dm rootdisk0    c0t0d0s2     -        143526328 -       -        -       -&lt;BR /&gt;dm rootdisk1    c0t1d0s2     -        143526328 -       -        -       -&lt;BR /&gt;sd rootdisk0-01 rootvol-02   ENABLED  4197952  0        -        -       -&lt;BR /&gt;sd rootdisk0-02 swapvol-02   ENABLED  4097720  0        -        -       -&lt;BR /&gt;sd rootdisk0-03 var-02       ENABLED  2098976  0        -        -       -&lt;BR /&gt;sd rootdisk0-04 opt-02       ENABLED  4197952  0        -        -       -&lt;BR /&gt;sd rootdisk0-05 home-02      ENABLED  125832432 0       -        -       -&lt;BR /&gt;sd rootdisk1-01 home-01      ENABLED  125832432 0       -        -       -&lt;BR /&gt;sd rootdisk1-02 opt-01       ENABLED  4197952  0        -        -       -&lt;BR /&gt;sd rootdisk1-03 rootvol-01   ENABLED  4197952  0        -        -       -&lt;BR /&gt;sd rootdisk1-04 swapvol-01   ENABLED  4097720  0        -        -       -&lt;BR /&gt;sd rootdisk1-05 var-01       ENABLED  2098976  0        -        -       -&lt;BR /&gt;pl home-01      home         ENABLED  125832432 -       ACTIVE   -       -&lt;BR /&gt;pl home-02      home         ENABLED  125832432 -       ACTIVE   -       -&lt;BR /&gt;pl opt-01       opt          ENABLED  4197952  -        ACTIVE   -       -&lt;BR /&gt;pl opt-02       opt          ENABLED  4197952  -        ACTIVE   -       -&lt;BR /&gt;pl rootvol-01   rootvol      ENABLED  4197952  -        ACTIVE   -       -&lt;BR /&gt;pl rootvol-02   rootvol      ENABLED  4197952  -        ACTIVE   -       -&lt;BR /&gt;pl swapvol-01   swapvol      ENABLED  4097720  -        ACTIVE   -       -&lt;BR /&gt;pl swapvol-02   swapvol      ENABLED  4097720  -        ACTIVE   -       -&lt;BR /&gt;pl var-01       var          ENABLED  2098976  -        ACTIVE   -       -&lt;BR /&gt;pl var-02       var          ENABLED  2098976  -        ACTIVE   -       -&lt;BR /&gt;v  home         fsgen        ENABLED  125832432 -       ACTIVE   -       -&lt;BR /&gt;v  opt          fsgen        ENABLED  4197952  -        ACTIVE   -       -&lt;BR /&gt;v  rootvol      root         ENABLED  4197952  -        ACTIVE   -       -&lt;BR /&gt;v  swapvol      swap         ENABLED  4097720  -        ACTIVE   -       -&lt;BR /&gt;v  var          fsgen        ENABLED  2098976  -        ACTIVE   -       -&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 05:07:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vxvm-lousy-syncing-rate/m-p/3852155#M612227</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ralph Grothe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-29T05:07:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VxVM lousy syncing rate</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vxvm-lousy-syncing-rate/m-p/3852156#M612228</link>
      <description>Ralph,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've never used VxVM rootability on Solaris (where I use Disksuite/SVM) or HP-UX (where I continue to use LVM). I only use VxVM on my non-OS/boot/root disks.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When we migrate to HP-UX 11.23 though - that will change.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Now to your topic at hand.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you are experiencing synch (or plex attach)times of 30+ hours for a 60GB volume - then I will surmise (1) you've a very busy system  (2) your volume is so active  (3) your disks are just darn slow...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But the possibly glaring reason why it is that slow is your home volume being on the same disk as your OS...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you've the extra budget and you want faster synch times -- you may want to invest on an add-on feature called FLashsnap (ersthwhile called FMR or Fast Mirror Resync)... What it does is your subsequent mirror resynchs will only synch blocks that have changed...  We use this technology on our multi-terabyte Oracle split mirror backups instead of relying on hardware (array based) split mirrors or BCVs which locks us down to the array vendir. With this host based approach, we can kick out any array vendor from our datacenter and replace it with another and still keep our split mirror/FMR backup scheme the same.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:28:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vxvm-lousy-syncing-rate/m-p/3852156#M612228</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alzhy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-30T08:28:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VxVM lousy syncing rate</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vxvm-lousy-syncing-rate/m-p/3852157#M612229</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;Hello Nelson,&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;it looks as if there isn't a license installed for FlashSnap.&lt;BR /&gt;The funny thing is, that when I got the&lt;BR /&gt;parcels with all the Vx software a doc&lt;BR /&gt;a couple of years ago,&lt;BR /&gt;that there was also this slim Admin Guide&lt;BR /&gt;for FlashSnap (still wrapped in celophane).&lt;BR /&gt;I hope I haven't forgotton to obtain a license key for FlashSnap as well those days.&lt;BR /&gt;  &lt;BR /&gt;# /sbin/vxlicrep -s|egrep 'Product Name|License Type'&lt;BR /&gt;   Product Name                        = VERITAS Foundation Suite&lt;BR /&gt;   License Type                        = PERMANENT_NODE_LOCK&lt;BR /&gt;   Product Name                        = VERITAS Volume Manager&lt;BR /&gt;   License Type                        = PERMANENT_NODE_LOCK&lt;BR /&gt;   Product Name                        = VERITAS File System&lt;BR /&gt;   License Type                        = PERMANENT_NODE_LOCK&lt;BR /&gt;   Product Name                        = VERITAS SANPoint Control&lt;BR /&gt;   License Type                        = PERMANENT_NODE_LOCK&lt;BR /&gt;   Product Name                        = VERITAS Foundation Suite&lt;BR /&gt;   License Type                        = PERMANENT_NODE_LOCK&lt;BR /&gt;   Product Name                        = VERITAS Volume Manager&lt;BR /&gt;   License Type                        = PERMANENT_NODE_LOCK&lt;BR /&gt;   Product Name                        = VERITAS File System&lt;BR /&gt;   License Type                        = PERMANENT_NODE_LOCK&lt;BR /&gt;   Product Name                        = VERITAS SANPoint Control&lt;BR /&gt;   License Type                        = PERMANENT_NODE_LOCK&lt;BR /&gt;   Product Name                        = VERITAS Cluster Server&lt;BR /&gt;   License Type                        = PERMANENT&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:51:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vxvm-lousy-syncing-rate/m-p/3852157#M612229</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ralph Grothe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-30T09:51:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VxVM lousy syncing rate</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vxvm-lousy-syncing-rate/m-p/3852158#M612230</link>
      <description>Ah forgot,&lt;BR /&gt;Nelson would you mind reporting on your experience with VxVM rootdisks under HP-UX,&lt;BR /&gt;once your migration to 11.23 is through?&lt;BR /&gt;I would like to find out if HP achieved a better OS integration than SUN.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:54:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vxvm-lousy-syncing-rate/m-p/3852158#M612230</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ralph Grothe</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-30T09:54:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VxVM lousy syncing rate</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vxvm-lousy-syncing-rate/m-p/3852159#M612231</link>
      <description>Ralph,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I actually had several environments 11.11 rooted with VxVM a few years ago (2002 to be exact) and I must say VxVM integration within HP-UX is the best that I've seen..&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The manuals on 3.5M under 11.11 are testament to how HP had planned VxVM to be its preferred Volume Manager.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The reason I stick with LVM is that there are already well entrenched LVM based OS disk recovery procedures that I did not want to risk overhauling -- specially that I was the only VxVM "expert" in the team... &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Will let you know as soon as I'm done with my 11.23 adventures... and VxVM 4.1 which reportedly makes obsolete the requisite "rootdg" diskgroup...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:59:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/vxvm-lousy-syncing-rate/m-p/3852159#M612231</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alzhy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-30T09:59:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

