<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: a simple performance check program in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/a-simple-performance-check-program/m-p/5257133#M612299</link>
    <description>I found a copy of the old Byte magazine program nbench converted to Linux.  I altered the makefile a bit, and I got what I needed.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:33:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TwoProc</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-09-29T20:33:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>a simple performance check program</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/a-simple-performance-check-program/m-p/5257132#M612298</link>
      <description>I need a simple c program that I can compile across hpux on parisc and hpux on Itanium to do some simple cpu tests for speed.  And, I need roughly the same to check for memory throughput, or both at the same time.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For example, I know of Bonnie for testing disk I/O as a very simple C program I can compile on either platform.  Can anyone point me to one for HPUX for Itanium vs PARISC for testing CPU (integer, floating pt, etc), and memory allocation, de-allocation, reading and writing?&lt;BR /&gt;If not a single program, then multiple programs for testing each area would be fine as well.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I could write something relatively easily, but I have to believe this has been done already.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;John</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:45:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/a-simple-performance-check-program/m-p/5257132#M612298</guid>
      <dc:creator>TwoProc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-29T18:45:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: a simple performance check program</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/a-simple-performance-check-program/m-p/5257133#M612299</link>
      <description>I found a copy of the old Byte magazine program nbench converted to Linux.  I altered the makefile a bit, and I got what I needed.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:33:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/a-simple-performance-check-program/m-p/5257133#M612299</guid>
      <dc:creator>TwoProc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-29T20:33:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: a simple performance check program</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/a-simple-performance-check-program/m-p/5257134#M612300</link>
      <description>I don't know why the system gave this question a rabbit with no responses from the group and no pts awarded.  Seems goofy.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:35:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/a-simple-performance-check-program/m-p/5257134#M612300</guid>
      <dc:creator>TwoProc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-29T20:35:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: a simple performance check program</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/a-simple-performance-check-program/m-p/5257135#M612301</link>
      <description>The problem with simple benchmarks is the ease with which they can become simplistic.  And the more simplistic, the less accurate a prediction for "real" applications.  For example, something measuring CPU with a really tiny working set may fit entirely not just in the last level cache, but also in the lower level caches.  In those cases, frequency can "win" and show a delta that will be rather different from real applications.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The gold standard for measuring CPU performance would include SPEC's CPU2006 suite.  That though is probably out of the reach of many.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For an explicit memory bandwidth microbenchmark, McCalpin's STREAM benchmark is widely accepted.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:49:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/a-simple-performance-check-program/m-p/5257135#M612301</guid>
      <dc:creator>rick jones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-29T22:49:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: a simple performance check program</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/a-simple-performance-check-program/m-p/5257136#M612302</link>
      <description>&amp;gt;I don't know why the system gave this question a rabbit with no responses from the group&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You get a rabbit if you assign 8 or more to any reply.  You also get it if you close it and say that the problem was resolved or some such wording.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 05:35:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/a-simple-performance-check-program/m-p/5257136#M612302</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dennis Handly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-30T05:35:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: a simple performance check program</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/a-simple-performance-check-program/m-p/5257137#M612303</link>
      <description>yeah Rick, I agree - the problem is that I am benchmarking with regression testing, and I'm not seeing what I'm supposed to be seeing in a total throughput capacity, at least not even close to what I'm expecting.  So, I wanted to see that, at the very least, basic cpu computations and memory allocations, etc are indeed faster with the newer cpu systems and hardware than the old one.  Then, I could know that it should be  a tuning/setup issue, and not a pure horsepower cpu/memory issue.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have the big gorrilla comparison, at that point all I wanted the small one.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for the helpful advice guys.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:44:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/a-simple-performance-check-program/m-p/5257137#M612303</guid>
      <dc:creator>TwoProc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-30T19:44:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

