<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: naming logical volumes in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/naming-logical-volumes/m-p/4982736#M616552</link>
    <description>It's always better to have meaningful names like lvora or lvdata, but make sure you always start with "lv"; It makes it easier to run commands on all of them at once by using lv*</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 16:19:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Christian Tremblay</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-06-02T16:19:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>naming logical volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/naming-logical-volumes/m-p/4982734#M616550</link>
      <description>I am setting up a new server (1st time) and need to create the logical volumes.  I understand it does not technically matter if I name them an actual name (like one that refers to the content) or if I name them lvol1 lvol2 etc...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The advantage to the name seems that I would quicky know what is what.  &lt;BR /&gt;But I am not sure if there is a reason I do not know of that one would be better than the other.  &lt;BR /&gt;Please let me know what you think.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks-</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 16:11:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/naming-logical-volumes/m-p/4982734#M616550</guid>
      <dc:creator>chmc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-02T16:11:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: naming logical volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/naming-logical-volumes/m-p/4982735#M616551</link>
      <description>I actually prefer the default lvol1, lvol2, ... convention because then I know that the LVOL name means nothing. Now consider the case of lvoradata1, lvoradata2, ... . You THINK you know what that means but do you really know? In short, my approach is to NEVER trust the LVOL names to mean anything and then I never make stupid assumptions.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In any case there is really no right or wrong approach and the ONLY way to know if an LVOL is truly unused is to document, document, document --- and force your fellow admins to do the same.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 16:18:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/naming-logical-volumes/m-p/4982735#M616551</guid>
      <dc:creator>A. Clay Stephenson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-02T16:18:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: naming logical volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/naming-logical-volumes/m-p/4982736#M616552</link>
      <description>It's always better to have meaningful names like lvora or lvdata, but make sure you always start with "lv"; It makes it easier to run commands on all of them at once by using lv*</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 16:19:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/naming-logical-volumes/m-p/4982736#M616552</guid>
      <dc:creator>Christian Tremblay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-02T16:19:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: naming logical volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/naming-logical-volumes/m-p/4982737#M616553</link>
      <description>LVOLS are counted like lvol1, lvol2 and so on internally, why not give names like that. This makes a lot of things easier ...&lt;BR /&gt;Just document your whole config - it is worth to do this!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 16:48:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/naming-logical-volumes/m-p/4982737#M616553</guid>
      <dc:creator>Torsten.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-02T16:48:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: naming logical volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/naming-logical-volumes/m-p/4982738#M616554</link>
      <description>Hi:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I use the default names -- 'lvol1', 'lvol2', etc.  Documentation and the mapping provided by 'etc/fstab' provide the contextual knowledge necessary.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;One advantage to doing this is if you ever forget to create a mapfile during a 'vgexport' or have lost one prior to a 'vgimport' the default names are used during the import phase.  See the manpages for 'vgimport' and 'vgexport'.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;...JRF...</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 16:58:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/naming-logical-volumes/m-p/4982738#M616554</guid>
      <dc:creator>James R. Ferguson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-02T16:58:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: naming logical volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/naming-logical-volumes/m-p/4982739#M616555</link>
      <description>Thank you for your thoughts around this.  I realize there is no absolute right/wrong answer but I appreciate others experiences.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 17:26:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/naming-logical-volumes/m-p/4982739#M616555</guid>
      <dc:creator>chmc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-02T17:26:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

