<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: slow disk performance in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/slow-disk-performance/m-p/3507019#M625112</link>
    <description>I was told that our EVA is striped very well, it just seems like we cant touch the performance that we could get. Most of our LV's have 10-20% so it seems were fine there.  All of our issues come down to diskIO and im just trying to eliminate some of the possibilities.  Thanks for the info.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;John</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:28:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>John Oberlander</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-03-17T12:28:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>slow disk performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/slow-disk-performance/m-p/3507017#M625110</link>
      <description>Im running HP-UX11i v1, on a HP9000 10cpu, 18G mem, and a Storageworks EVA / secure path A.3.0E.00F.00F. We are running Universe database for collections with alot of users and heavy read/writes. I just started at this company and kinda of a newbie when it comes to HP admin.  The question i have is what is the normal percentage of free disk space you should have on a file system.  If the logical volume is 90some% full, won't this hinder performance expecially for writes cause the data becomes more fragmented, and takes a longer time to find a place for consecutive writes?  I've always followed 20% free in the linux ext2/3 world.  Thanks in advance.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:01:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/slow-disk-performance/m-p/3507017#M625110</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Oberlander</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-03-17T12:01:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: slow disk performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/slow-disk-performance/m-p/3507018#M625111</link>
      <description>I tend to keep about 10-15 % free. I also regularly do defrags. But most of the time it is not required. With VxFS file system, the space allocation is extend based. In order to get good performance, I tend to strip the data over available disks.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;you should dir and extend fragmentation first before doing anything.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;fsadm -E and -D options.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:24:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/slow-disk-performance/m-p/3507018#M625111</guid>
      <dc:creator>RAC_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-03-17T12:24:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: slow disk performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/slow-disk-performance/m-p/3507019#M625112</link>
      <description>I was told that our EVA is striped very well, it just seems like we cant touch the performance that we could get. Most of our LV's have 10-20% so it seems were fine there.  All of our issues come down to diskIO and im just trying to eliminate some of the possibilities.  Thanks for the info.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;John</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:28:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/slow-disk-performance/m-p/3507019#M625112</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Oberlander</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-03-17T12:28:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: slow disk performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/slow-disk-performance/m-p/3507020#M625113</link>
      <description>I have always understood that you take a performance hit with file systems that are close to full. How many systems are attached to the EVA?  You may be able to increase the queue depth (default is 8 in HP-UX, max 256) to take greater advantage of the EVA.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2005 18:24:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/slow-disk-performance/m-p/3507020#M625113</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ted Buis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-03-18T18:24:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

