<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Regarding JFS in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-jfs/m-p/2426232#M655754</link>
    <description>As compared to HFS, JFS has these advantages:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   -- Much shorter recovery times in the event of system failure&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;      This is accomplished through the use of the intent log, which only&lt;BR /&gt;      stores changes made to the file system structure, including partial&lt;BR /&gt;      changes. When fsck is run on a JFS file system, by default, it&lt;BR /&gt;      will only read the intent log, instead of the entire file system.&lt;BR /&gt;      For more information, refer to the fsck_vxfs(1M) man page.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   -- Much faster I/O&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;      This is particularly useful in environments that require high&lt;BR /&gt;      performance or deal with large volumes of data. This is&lt;BR /&gt;      because the unit of file storage, called an extent, can be multiple&lt;BR /&gt;      blocks, allowing considerably faster I/O than with HFS.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   -- Much less downtime (if optional OnlineJFS is used)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;      The optional OnlineJFS product provides functionality not available&lt;BR /&gt;      with HFS, such as online backups, online resizing, online&lt;BR /&gt;      defragmentation, extent attributes, and caching advisories.&lt;BR /&gt;      That is, unmounting the file system will not be necessary for&lt;BR /&gt;      certain tasks.&lt;BR /&gt;This information is from Document#UNX1030190&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://us-support2.external.hp.com/cki/bin/doc.pl/" target="_blank"&gt;http://us-support2.external.hp.com/cki/bin/doc.pl/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Brian&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;*(((&amp;gt;&amp;lt; er&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2000 12:26:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Brian M. Fisher</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2000-06-14T12:26:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Regarding JFS</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-jfs/m-p/2426231#M655753</link>
      <description>Is there any advantage to convert from HFS to VxFS to gain access time, because a monitor my server with glance and i notice disk bottleneck quite often? All my file systems are in HFS.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2000 12:18:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-jfs/m-p/2426231#M655753</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jasmin Berube</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-06-14T12:18:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding JFS</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-jfs/m-p/2426232#M655754</link>
      <description>As compared to HFS, JFS has these advantages:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   -- Much shorter recovery times in the event of system failure&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;      This is accomplished through the use of the intent log, which only&lt;BR /&gt;      stores changes made to the file system structure, including partial&lt;BR /&gt;      changes. When fsck is run on a JFS file system, by default, it&lt;BR /&gt;      will only read the intent log, instead of the entire file system.&lt;BR /&gt;      For more information, refer to the fsck_vxfs(1M) man page.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   -- Much faster I/O&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;      This is particularly useful in environments that require high&lt;BR /&gt;      performance or deal with large volumes of data. This is&lt;BR /&gt;      because the unit of file storage, called an extent, can be multiple&lt;BR /&gt;      blocks, allowing considerably faster I/O than with HFS.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   -- Much less downtime (if optional OnlineJFS is used)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;      The optional OnlineJFS product provides functionality not available&lt;BR /&gt;      with HFS, such as online backups, online resizing, online&lt;BR /&gt;      defragmentation, extent attributes, and caching advisories.&lt;BR /&gt;      That is, unmounting the file system will not be necessary for&lt;BR /&gt;      certain tasks.&lt;BR /&gt;This information is from Document#UNX1030190&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://us-support2.external.hp.com/cki/bin/doc.pl/" target="_blank"&gt;http://us-support2.external.hp.com/cki/bin/doc.pl/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Brian&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;lt;*(((&amp;gt;&amp;lt; er&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2000 12:26:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-jfs/m-p/2426232#M655754</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brian M. Fisher</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-06-14T12:26:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding JFS</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-jfs/m-p/2426233#M655755</link>
      <description>One thing you should be aware of is that there have been many, many, many patches issued for JFS (and LVM) that address issues such as data corruption.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Be sure you have the ones appropriate for your system.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2000 22:38:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-jfs/m-p/2426233#M655755</guid>
      <dc:creator>Michael Lampi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-06-19T22:38:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding JFS</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-jfs/m-p/2426234#M655756</link>
      <description>I also have some questions about this thread. I currently have several disks that&lt;BR /&gt;have Oracle Data on them that are all hfs and all have mirrors. How does the&lt;BR /&gt;mirroring affect changing from hfs to vxfs? Would changing to vxfs be a noticable&lt;BR /&gt;improvement in i/o? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2000 16:06:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-jfs/m-p/2426234#M655756</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dave Chamberlin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-06-20T16:06:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regarding JFS</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-jfs/m-p/2426235#M655757</link>
      <description>Mirroring occurs at the logical volume leve.  hfs vs vxfs has no impact upon Mirror-UX implementation.  You will probably increase performance by shifting to vxfs filesystems.  There is no way to "translate" from one form to another.  You need to recreate the filesystem and restore data.  This can be done manually or through a make_recovery/Ignite restoration.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2000 18:11:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/regarding-jfs/m-p/2426235#M655757</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alan Riggs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-06-20T18:11:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

