<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic File systems could not unmount, package came down, but did not move in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/file-systems-could-not-unmount-package-came-down-but-did-not/m-p/4799200#M657708</link>
    <description>We executed a move of a package from nodeA to nodeB in the following manner:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# cmhaltpkg -v SG_PACKAGE&lt;BR /&gt;# cmrunpkg -v -n  SG_PACKAGE&lt;BR /&gt;# cmmodpkg -v -e SG_PACKAGE&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Operation normally takes about 12 seconds. The package contains a VG with three file systems. In the process of doing cmhaltpkg, it eventually failed. I checked, and only one of the three file systems was unmounted.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;fuser -c showed that there was a process on one of the remaining file systems. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there some flag I can use for the unmount option of the LVM file systems to force the umount, even if a process is still 'locked' on it?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In this scenario, due to the nature of the file systems, our start/stop script for the package includes a loop to do an fuser -ck on the file systems twice before it then goes to the package shutdown. However, the particular process in question was rapidly being respawned by a parent process elsewhere on the system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;A force umount would be good, if it exists.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:22:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>chisle</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-15T21:22:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>File systems could not unmount, package came down, but did not move</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/file-systems-could-not-unmount-package-came-down-but-did-not/m-p/4799200#M657708</link>
      <description>We executed a move of a package from nodeA to nodeB in the following manner:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# cmhaltpkg -v SG_PACKAGE&lt;BR /&gt;# cmrunpkg -v -n  SG_PACKAGE&lt;BR /&gt;# cmmodpkg -v -e SG_PACKAGE&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Operation normally takes about 12 seconds. The package contains a VG with three file systems. In the process of doing cmhaltpkg, it eventually failed. I checked, and only one of the three file systems was unmounted.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;fuser -c showed that there was a process on one of the remaining file systems. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there some flag I can use for the unmount option of the LVM file systems to force the umount, even if a process is still 'locked' on it?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In this scenario, due to the nature of the file systems, our start/stop script for the package includes a loop to do an fuser -ck on the file systems twice before it then goes to the package shutdown. However, the particular process in question was rapidly being respawned by a parent process elsewhere on the system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;A force umount would be good, if it exists.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:22:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/file-systems-could-not-unmount-package-came-down-but-did-not/m-p/4799200#M657708</guid>
      <dc:creator>chisle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-15T21:22:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: File systems could not unmount, package came down, but did not move</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/file-systems-could-not-unmount-package-came-down-but-did-not/m-p/4799201#M657709</link>
      <description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt; the particular process in question was rapidly being respawned by a parent process elsewhere on the system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is this process belongs to application that use cluster FS or system process ?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:50:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/file-systems-could-not-unmount-package-came-down-but-did-not/m-p/4799201#M657709</guid>
      <dc:creator>Shibin_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-16T02:50:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: File systems could not unmount, package came down, but did not move</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/file-systems-could-not-unmount-package-came-down-but-did-not/m-p/4799202#M657710</link>
      <description>it was a user process from elsewhere that was trying to reload a ksh script from the SG FS each time it was killed with the fuser -ck command.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We were finally able to unmount once we killed the PPID, then varied off the vg, etc.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However, what we really needed, and would have saved time, would be a force option, if it exists.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 02:58:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/file-systems-could-not-unmount-package-came-down-but-did-not/m-p/4799202#M657710</guid>
      <dc:creator>chisle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-16T02:58:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

