<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Unsatified symbol with ld ( linker) in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/unsatified-symbol-with-ld-linker/m-p/4677223#M658587</link>
    <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;&amp;gt; Can somebody throw some light on why these&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; functions are termed as unstaisfied symbols. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The linker is not seeing them?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Perhaps you can throw some light on what&lt;BR /&gt;you're actually doing.  "porting our&lt;BR /&gt;software" is not a very useful description of&lt;BR /&gt;what you compiled (or how, using what), or&lt;BR /&gt;what you're trying to link (or how), or what,&lt;BR /&gt;exactly, happened when you did whatever you&lt;BR /&gt;did, or where these functions might be&lt;BR /&gt;defined.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; Unsatisfied symbol "function_name" in file library_name.a [ filename ]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sounds to me like "some problem" in&lt;BR /&gt;"some_file" (somewhere).</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:34:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Steven Schweda</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-08-19T16:34:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Unsatified symbol with ld ( linker)</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/unsatified-symbol-with-ld-linker/m-p/4677222#M658586</link>
      <description>Hi everybody,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;While porting our software from suselinux to HP-UX we are having some linking errors which says &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Unsatisfied symbol "function_name" in file library_name.a [ filename ]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;"function_name" are user defined functions.&lt;BR /&gt;Can somebody throw some light on why these functions are termed as unstaisfied symbols. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:53:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/unsatified-symbol-with-ld-linker/m-p/4677222#M658586</guid>
      <dc:creator>adityahuawei</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-19T14:53:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unsatified symbol with ld ( linker)</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/unsatified-symbol-with-ld-linker/m-p/4677223#M658587</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;&amp;gt; Can somebody throw some light on why these&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; functions are termed as unstaisfied symbols. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The linker is not seeing them?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Perhaps you can throw some light on what&lt;BR /&gt;you're actually doing.  "porting our&lt;BR /&gt;software" is not a very useful description of&lt;BR /&gt;what you compiled (or how, using what), or&lt;BR /&gt;what you're trying to link (or how), or what,&lt;BR /&gt;exactly, happened when you did whatever you&lt;BR /&gt;did, or where these functions might be&lt;BR /&gt;defined.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; Unsatisfied symbol "function_name" in file library_name.a [ filename ]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sounds to me like "some problem" in&lt;BR /&gt;"some_file" (somewhere).</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:34:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/unsatified-symbol-with-ld-linker/m-p/4677223#M658587</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven Schweda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-19T16:34:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unsatified symbol with ld ( linker)</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/unsatified-symbol-with-ld-linker/m-p/4677224#M658588</link>
      <description>&amp;gt;Can somebody throw some light on why these functions are termed as unsatisfied symbols.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You are calling a function that has no definition.  Where do you think it should be defined?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The function is used in library_name.a in object file filename.o.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you claim the function is really defined, it could be a mismatch in extern "C".&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It would have helped if you had provided the exact message.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 02:50:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/unsatified-symbol-with-ld-linker/m-p/4677224#M658588</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dennis Handly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-20T02:50:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unsatified symbol with ld ( linker)</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/unsatified-symbol-with-ld-linker/m-p/4677225#M658589</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;While linking definition of the symbols should be available to the linker. Looks you might have missed including those while linking.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Check for the files where those symbols are defined and include them.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-Pramod.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 02:50:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/unsatified-symbol-with-ld-linker/m-p/4677225#M658589</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pramod Kumar M</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-20T02:50:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

