<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SWVERIFY in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/swverify/m-p/5177981#M663841</link>
    <description>Shalom,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Your results are normal.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Actually pretty low.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The first time I ran the command the count was several thousand on a fairly new system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 19:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-05-27T19:24:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SWVERIFY</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/swverify/m-p/5177977#M663837</link>
      <description>When I run check_patches on my systems (RX8640 running HPUX 11.23) I get "NO PROBLEMS FOUND" running swverify  However, running swverify \* shows "thousands" of errors..  What is the difference?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:24:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/swverify/m-p/5177977#M663837</guid>
      <dc:creator>JA Hegedus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-27T18:24:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SWVERIFY</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/swverify/m-p/5177978#M663838</link>
      <description>Shalom,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;swverify always shows errors. It checks a lot of little details.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The output needs to be checked for corrupt patches. This needs to be dealt with, most of the swverify problems are pretty mundane.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;They freak you out the first time you see them, but many are meaningless.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:32:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/swverify/m-p/5177978#M663838</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-27T18:32:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SWVERIFY</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/swverify/m-p/5177979#M663839</link>
      <description>Hi:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;A full 'swverify \*' examines not only patches but all installed products and filesets.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;While the 'check_patches' script performs a 'swverify' this is limited to patches only --- those filesets whose names begin with PHCO, PHKL, PHNE, or PHSS.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;...JRF...</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:38:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/swverify/m-p/5177979#M663839</guid>
      <dc:creator>James R. Ferguson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-27T18:38:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SWVERIFY</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/swverify/m-p/5177980#M663840</link>
      <description>Thanks, Thats what I thought. I just ran an swverify \* on a system that was cleanly installed and I still got some 433 errors..</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 19:17:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/swverify/m-p/5177980#M663840</guid>
      <dc:creator>JA Hegedus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-27T19:17:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SWVERIFY</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/swverify/m-p/5177981#M663841</link>
      <description>Shalom,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Your results are normal.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Actually pretty low.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The first time I ran the command the count was several thousand on a fairly new system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SEP</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 19:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/swverify/m-p/5177981#M663841</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven E. Protter</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-27T19:24:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SWVERIFY</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/swverify/m-p/5177982#M663842</link>
      <description>What I have found in various responces verified that the results are normal .&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks all for the help</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 19:49:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/swverify/m-p/5177982#M663842</guid>
      <dc:creator>JA Hegedus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-27T19:49:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SWVERIFY</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/swverify/m-p/5177983#M663843</link>
      <description>&amp;gt;SEP: swverify always shows errors.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This is unfortunate.  Ideally HP's products should be swverify error free.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 20:37:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/swverify/m-p/5177983#M663843</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dennis Handly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-27T20:37:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

