<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Fortran Compiler in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/fortran-compiler/m-p/4591075#M679544</link>
    <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;&amp;gt; [...] the compiler preinstalled was f90.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Not exactly the precise version.  I gather&lt;BR /&gt;that these might say something serious:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;      what /opt/fortran90/bin/f90&lt;BR /&gt;      f90 +version&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I know nothing, but a quick Google search for&lt;BR /&gt;      hp-ux fortran&lt;BR /&gt;led to a bunch of useful stuff.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://h21007.www2.hp.com/portal/site/dspp/PAGE.template/page.document?ciid=c4080f1bace021100f1bace02110275d6e10RCRD" target="_blank"&gt;http://h21007.www2.hp.com/portal/site/dspp/PAGE.template/page.document?ciid=c4080f1bace021100f1bace02110275d6e10RCRD&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://docs.hp.com/en/B3909-90002/index.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://docs.hp.com/en/B3909-90002/index.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Look for "77".&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Fortran is FORTRAN, isn't it?</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:51:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Steven Schweda</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-25T16:51:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Fortran Compiler</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/fortran-compiler/m-p/4591073#M679542</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;A customer has received a RP3440 with HP-UX 11.23. &lt;BR /&gt;He needed Fortran 77, but the compiler preinstalled was f90.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;He needs to know if it's possible to use f90 as f77 compiler, and if so, in which way.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Many thanks in advance for your help.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;                  Pierluigi Cecchi</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:13:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/fortran-compiler/m-p/4591073#M679542</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pierluigi Cecchi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-25T16:13:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fortran Compiler</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/fortran-compiler/m-p/4591074#M679543</link>
      <description>You might try compiling with the +U77 option.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Pete</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:37:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/fortran-compiler/m-p/4591074#M679543</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pete Randall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-25T16:37:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fortran Compiler</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/fortran-compiler/m-p/4591075#M679544</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;&amp;gt; [...] the compiler preinstalled was f90.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Not exactly the precise version.  I gather&lt;BR /&gt;that these might say something serious:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;      what /opt/fortran90/bin/f90&lt;BR /&gt;      f90 +version&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I know nothing, but a quick Google search for&lt;BR /&gt;      hp-ux fortran&lt;BR /&gt;led to a bunch of useful stuff.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://h21007.www2.hp.com/portal/site/dspp/PAGE.template/page.document?ciid=c4080f1bace021100f1bace02110275d6e10RCRD" target="_blank"&gt;http://h21007.www2.hp.com/portal/site/dspp/PAGE.template/page.document?ciid=c4080f1bace021100f1bace02110275d6e10RCRD&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://docs.hp.com/en/B3909-90002/index.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://docs.hp.com/en/B3909-90002/index.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Look for "77".&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Fortran is FORTRAN, isn't it?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:51:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/fortran-compiler/m-p/4591075#M679544</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven Schweda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-25T16:51:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fortran Compiler</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/fortran-compiler/m-p/4591076#M679545</link>
      <description>&amp;gt;if it's possible to use f90 as f77 compiler, and if so, in which way.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm not sure.  You could just use f90.  And if problems, look at f90(1) for "77" and select those individual options.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;Steven: Fortran is FORTRAN, isn't it?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Not sure your point?&lt;BR /&gt;All Fortrans are alike?  :-)&lt;BR /&gt;Or Fortran should be spelled FORTRAN?&lt;BR /&gt;The last thing I heard was they gave up and that Fortran is Standard.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.nag.co.uk/SC22WG5/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.nag.co.uk/SC22WG5/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And before I abandoned COBOL, it was still spelled COBOL.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cobolstandard.info/wg4/wg4.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.cobolstandard.info/wg4/wg4.html&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 04:53:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/fortran-compiler/m-p/4591076#M679545</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dennis Handly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-26T04:53:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fortran Compiler</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/fortran-compiler/m-p/4591077#M679546</link>
      <description>I believe you will find the f90 compiler supports 77 syntax as well as f90, although there are significant differences in the compiler directives (see the link Steven pointed out above).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;the docs *seem* to suggest that it may be as simple as the extension on the source file, with .f or .F being f77 syntax, and .f90 being fortran 90.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:19:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/fortran-compiler/m-p/4591077#M679546</guid>
      <dc:creator>OldSchool</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-26T15:19:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Fortran Compiler</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/fortran-compiler/m-p/4591078#M679547</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;&amp;gt;  I believe you will find [...]&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I haven't done any serious work with Fortran&lt;BR /&gt;since it was FORTRAN (and '77 was the new&lt;BR /&gt;thing), so I know nothing, but I had the&lt;BR /&gt;vague impression that all (or almost all) of&lt;BR /&gt;the old syntax was still legal, so that a new&lt;BR /&gt;compiler would (generally) be able to&lt;BR /&gt;tolerate old code.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It should be easy enough to run the&lt;BR /&gt;experiment.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;A few pieces of old (simple) Fortran code&lt;BR /&gt;which I can find lying around on my VMS&lt;BR /&gt;system seem to go though the newer Fortran 90&lt;BR /&gt;compiler there ("the HP Fortran (formerly the&lt;BR /&gt;Compaq Fortran 90) compiler").</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:19:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/fortran-compiler/m-p/4591078#M679547</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven Schweda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-26T21:19:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

