<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: C code in Proc Code in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/c-code-in-proc-code/m-p/4470972#M680189</link>
    <description>"....e if we want that any particular line can not be processed by pro *c comipler but compile fine by C compiler...."&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ProC isn't a compiler.  It's a preprocessor.  It function is to convert embedded SQL statements in to conventional C to call Oracle's library.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Perhaps an actual example of the code would be helpful (if you have such) as it should only act on the embedded SQL and not care about the rest.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:21:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>OldSchool</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-07-31T14:21:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>C code in Proc Code</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/c-code-in-proc-code/m-p/4470971#M680188</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;Can anyone tell me. is there any way that we can make our c code such that proc compiler doesn't compile it but after compilation their respective C code compile fine with this statement include in the code automatically... i.e if we want that any particular line can not be processed by pro *c comipler but compile fine by C compiler. is there any flag that we can prefix or postfix available or can we made some special type of block of code for this....</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:07:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/c-code-in-proc-code/m-p/4470971#M680188</guid>
      <dc:creator>kunal_ascs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-31T14:07:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: C code in Proc Code</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/c-code-in-proc-code/m-p/4470972#M680189</link>
      <description>"....e if we want that any particular line can not be processed by pro *c comipler but compile fine by C compiler...."&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ProC isn't a compiler.  It's a preprocessor.  It function is to convert embedded SQL statements in to conventional C to call Oracle's library.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Perhaps an actual example of the code would be helpful (if you have such) as it should only act on the embedded SQL and not care about the rest.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:21:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/c-code-in-proc-code/m-p/4470972#M680189</guid>
      <dc:creator>OldSchool</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-31T14:21:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: C code in Pro*C code</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/c-code-in-proc-code/m-p/4470973#M680190</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;(Your subject is confusing should use the actual name of Pro*C and not jam it together to look like "proc".)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;if we want that any particular line can not be processed by pro*c compiler but compile fine by C compiler.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Perhaps you should be asking Oracle this question?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 04:21:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/c-code-in-proc-code/m-p/4470973#M680190</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dennis Handly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-29T04:21:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

