<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 3 node cluster question in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/3-node-cluster-question/m-p/4091139#M690643</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Your minimal solution should work as you state, however, if you configure all nodes with all vgs you at least have the option of a third node to run the package on should it all go pear shaped.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Mike.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 02:58:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mike Shilladay</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-10-24T02:58:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>3 node cluster question</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/3-node-cluster-question/m-p/4091138#M690642</link>
      <description>Hy,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have a question about a 3 node cluster.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;lets say that you have nodes a, b and c.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And you have services x,y&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If i want to run x on a and have b as a failover&lt;BR /&gt;and run y on c and have b as a failover&lt;BR /&gt;so x can never go to c and y can never go to a&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;if you want this configuration, is it necesary that all the nodes see all the disks,vgs from the 3 nodes ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;or you can get away only whit:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;a whit disks,vgs for service x&lt;BR /&gt;b with disks,vgs for services x and y&lt;BR /&gt;c with disks,vgs for services y&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thnx</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 02:22:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/3-node-cluster-question/m-p/4091138#M690642</guid>
      <dc:creator>likid0</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-24T02:22:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3 node cluster question</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/3-node-cluster-question/m-p/4091139#M690643</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Your minimal solution should work as you state, however, if you configure all nodes with all vgs you at least have the option of a third node to run the package on should it all go pear shaped.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Mike.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 02:58:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/3-node-cluster-question/m-p/4091139#M690643</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mike Shilladay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-24T02:58:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3 node cluster question</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/3-node-cluster-question/m-p/4091140#M690644</link>
      <description>I had a old 11.00 situation that was running on autoraits you can create the cluster like you discribed whitout problems.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I advice to use a quorem server and not the lock disk, I can remeber that the cluster lock disk where working but that they have caused a problem in the end....</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 03:01:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/3-node-cluster-question/m-p/4091140#M690644</guid>
      <dc:creator>F Verschuren</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-24T03:01:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3 node cluster question</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/3-node-cluster-question/m-p/4091141#M690645</link>
      <description>Ok, thnx for the info</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 05:07:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/3-node-cluster-question/m-p/4091141#M690645</guid>
      <dc:creator>likid0</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-24T05:07:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3 node cluster question</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/3-node-cluster-question/m-p/4091142#M690646</link>
      <description>your plan is fine for the scenario you describe.&lt;BR /&gt;In cases where you must keep certain resources secured from others, because company a owns server a and company c owns server c, and by extension their disk...then your plan is exactly correct to secure them even at the disk level from one another.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Just make sure node B can handly running both, with no performance issues....that's the final trick.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Rgrds,&lt;BR /&gt;Rita</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 06:21:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/3-node-cluster-question/m-p/4091142#M690646</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rita C Workman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-10-24T06:21:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

