<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: DEPENDENCY_LOCATION keyword values in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/dependency-location-keyword-values/m-p/4069915#M694282</link>
    <description>DEPENDENCY_LOCATION is a new optional parameter with 11.18.  It is used in conjunction with dependent packages.&lt;BR /&gt;With this release of the Serviceguard product, DEPENDENCY_LOCATION only supports same_node.  Perhaps a future version of Serviceguard will permit the predecessor to operate on a different node.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;See&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://docs.hp.com/en/B3936-90117/ch06s01.html#cacddhbj" target="_blank"&gt;http://docs.hp.com/en/B3936-90117/ch06s01.html#cacddhbj&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;"dependency_location&lt;BR /&gt;Specifies where the dependency_condition must be met. The only legal value is same_node."</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:24:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Stephen Doud</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-09-13T08:24:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DEPENDENCY_LOCATION keyword values</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/dependency-location-keyword-values/m-p/4069914#M694281</link>
      <description>Hi all,&lt;BR /&gt;I'm giving a glance to new 11.18 version because I'm interesting in new packages dependencies options.&lt;BR /&gt;In ascii package conf file it is written that DEPENDENCY_LOCATION can have same_node as value.&lt;BR /&gt;Can really it have only this value?&lt;BR /&gt;If package1 had to depend on package2 but it didn't matter on which node package2 is running how would I have to do?&lt;BR /&gt;I would like to find a value for DEPENDENCY_LOCATION such as "any_node"...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank You&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Best Regards&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Mauro</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 04:06:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/dependency-location-keyword-values/m-p/4069914#M694281</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mauro Gatti</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-13T04:06:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DEPENDENCY_LOCATION keyword values</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/dependency-location-keyword-values/m-p/4069915#M694282</link>
      <description>DEPENDENCY_LOCATION is a new optional parameter with 11.18.  It is used in conjunction with dependent packages.&lt;BR /&gt;With this release of the Serviceguard product, DEPENDENCY_LOCATION only supports same_node.  Perhaps a future version of Serviceguard will permit the predecessor to operate on a different node.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;See&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://docs.hp.com/en/B3936-90117/ch06s01.html#cacddhbj" target="_blank"&gt;http://docs.hp.com/en/B3936-90117/ch06s01.html#cacddhbj&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;"dependency_location&lt;BR /&gt;Specifies where the dependency_condition must be met. The only legal value is same_node."</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:24:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/dependency-location-keyword-values/m-p/4069915#M694282</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stephen Doud</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-13T08:24:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

