<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SG and NIS in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sg-and-nis/m-p/4923464#M699059</link>
    <description>don't use broadcast, specify your NIS master and slaves with ypinit -c.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also, why are you using a class A network that is not subnetted?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:02:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kevin Wright</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-09-20T21:02:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SG and NIS</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sg-and-nis/m-p/4923461#M699056</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I wanted to know are there any recommendations about using NIS in SG environment?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The issue is, that when the NIS server/slave that the SG node is binded to is going down, it takes some times until the client is binded to another server. We have A class network so the bind takes a long time (broadcast) and I think that SG can fail.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So, what are the guidelines about working with NIS in SG environment?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Alex.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2005 03:25:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sg-and-nis/m-p/4923461#M699056</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alex Lavrov.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-09-05T03:25:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SG and NIS</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sg-and-nis/m-p/4923462#M699057</link>
      <description>Generally th erecommendation is to have ALL of the cluster addresses, including packages, in /etc/hosts and have the /etc/nsswitch.conf point to hosts first, and then DNS or NIS, whichever is your preference.&lt;BR /&gt;This then allows nodes to rejoin or start the cluster if the NIS or DNS servers are not available or responding.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2005 03:29:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sg-and-nis/m-p/4923462#M699057</guid>
      <dc:creator>melvyn burnard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-09-05T03:29:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SG and NIS</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sg-and-nis/m-p/4923463#M699058</link>
      <description>Thanx. My bad I didn't say that I'm more intersted about the /etc/passwd files.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hosts are managed with DNS and enyway all the nodes are declared localy.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanx</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2005 03:36:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sg-and-nis/m-p/4923463#M699058</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alex Lavrov.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-09-05T03:36:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SG and NIS</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sg-and-nis/m-p/4923464#M699059</link>
      <description>don't use broadcast, specify your NIS master and slaves with ypinit -c.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also, why are you using a class A network that is not subnetted?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:02:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sg-and-nis/m-p/4923464#M699059</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kevin Wright</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-09-20T21:02:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SG and NIS</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sg-and-nis/m-p/4923465#M699060</link>
      <description>It's no problem at all --- as long as you can live with the inherent insecurity of NIS. I ran MC/SG with NIS both with and without DNS for many years and never had a problem. The binding shouldn't be a problem as long as you make certain that you have at least one slave server on the subnet --- and 2 slaves would be even better.  In that case, at least one server is going to respond in a timely manner. It is a little odd to run a Class A network without breaking it into subnets --- that's what routers are made to do.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 21:15:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sg-and-nis/m-p/4923465#M699060</guid>
      <dc:creator>A. Clay Stephenson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-09-20T21:15:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SG and NIS</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sg-and-nis/m-p/4923466#M699061</link>
      <description>Thanx for the suggestions!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Kevin - in HP there is no "-c" option.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Alex.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 04:52:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/sg-and-nis/m-p/4923466#M699061</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alex Lavrov.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-09-21T04:52:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

