<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic HP-UX Tools.h++ /   RW SourceProCore 8.6.0 in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/hp-ux-tools-h-rw-sourceprocore-8-6-0/m-p/2753648#M722147</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We are currently porting a telecom application on SUN Solaris 2.8 and HP-UX 11.0.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This application is currently based on RW SourceProCore 8.6.0 (ed.2). We are studying the alternative to migrate to the Tools.H++ provided by the SUN/HP OS.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This seems to us rather risky in terms of backward compatibility (typically, HP-UX 11.0 / ACC A.03.33 provides Tools.h++ aligned to RW Tool.h++ 7.0.1.) but not fully unfeasible. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any answer to the following questions will be helpful:&lt;BR /&gt;- as we have a single line of code SUN/HP, i'm wondering if we will have face problems related to any difference of the Tools.H++ provided by SUN Solaris 2.8 vs HP UX 11.0&lt;BR /&gt;- is there any performance degradation/improvement when switching from RW SourceProCore 8.6.0 to HP-UX tools.h++?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any feedback/hint is welcome!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2002 15:14:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Lucie Nicotra</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-06-27T15:14:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>HP-UX Tools.h++ /   RW SourceProCore 8.6.0</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/hp-ux-tools-h-rw-sourceprocore-8-6-0/m-p/2753648#M722147</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We are currently porting a telecom application on SUN Solaris 2.8 and HP-UX 11.0.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This application is currently based on RW SourceProCore 8.6.0 (ed.2). We are studying the alternative to migrate to the Tools.H++ provided by the SUN/HP OS.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This seems to us rather risky in terms of backward compatibility (typically, HP-UX 11.0 / ACC A.03.33 provides Tools.h++ aligned to RW Tool.h++ 7.0.1.) but not fully unfeasible. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any answer to the following questions will be helpful:&lt;BR /&gt;- as we have a single line of code SUN/HP, i'm wondering if we will have face problems related to any difference of the Tools.H++ provided by SUN Solaris 2.8 vs HP UX 11.0&lt;BR /&gt;- is there any performance degradation/improvement when switching from RW SourceProCore 8.6.0 to HP-UX tools.h++?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any feedback/hint is welcome!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2002 15:14:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/hp-ux-tools-h-rw-sourceprocore-8-6-0/m-p/2753648#M722147</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lucie Nicotra</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-06-27T15:14:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

