<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PA 2.0 or PA 1.X ?? in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/pa-2-0-or-pa-1-x/m-p/2684316#M723271</link>
    <description>Hi:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you are trying to create code that will run on all (well, most) HP platforms then your best option is to use the +DAportable compiler option. While this will sacrifice some performance on the high-end boxes, you will be able to run on a broader equipment range. Because the vast majority of UNIX programs are not CPU bound or computationally intensive the performance hit will be very small.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you are doing CAD/CAM/analysis work and performance is a major concern then compiling for the different architectures makes sense.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Food for thought, Clay&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:28:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>A. Clay Stephenson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-03-15T16:28:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PA 2.0 or PA 1.X ??</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/pa-2-0-or-pa-1-x/m-p/2684311#M723266</link>
      <description>How do I determine the architecture level?.&lt;BR /&gt;And to determine a compilers upgrade history,&lt;BR /&gt;would I do so by listing all the compiler &lt;BR /&gt;patches which list the compiler versions, and&lt;BR /&gt;via the swinstall.log file?.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Randy&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:11:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/pa-2-0-or-pa-1-x/m-p/2684311#M723266</guid>
      <dc:creator>Randy_9</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-03-15T16:11:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA 2.0 or PA 1.X ??</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/pa-2-0-or-pa-1-x/m-p/2684312#M723267</link>
      <description>You can go into SAM -&amp;gt; PERFORMANCE MONITORS -&amp;gt; SYSTEM PROPERTIES and look at the CPU Version.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:18:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/pa-2-0-or-pa-1-x/m-p/2684312#M723267</guid>
      <dc:creator>Patrick Wallek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-03-15T16:18:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA 2.0 or PA 1.X ??</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/pa-2-0-or-pa-1-x/m-p/2684313#M723268</link>
      <description>Example ( on a B2000 )&lt;BR /&gt;# model&lt;BR /&gt;9000/785/B2000&lt;BR /&gt;# cd /usr/sam/lib/mo&lt;BR /&gt;# grep B2000 sched.models&lt;BR /&gt;B2000 2.0 PA8500&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:22:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/pa-2-0-or-pa-1-x/m-p/2684313#M723268</guid>
      <dc:creator>S.K. Chan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-03-15T16:22:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA 2.0 or PA 1.X ??</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/pa-2-0-or-pa-1-x/m-p/2684314#M723269</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You can look at the swinstall.log file. Also swlist -lfileset.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For PA RISC level, SAM-&amp;gt;Performance monitors -&amp;gt; system properties -&amp;gt; Processor&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also look at STM&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH,&lt;BR /&gt;Shiju</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:22:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/pa-2-0-or-pa-1-x/m-p/2684314#M723269</guid>
      <dc:creator>Helen French</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-03-15T16:22:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA 2.0 or PA 1.X ??</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/pa-2-0-or-pa-1-x/m-p/2684315#M723270</link>
      <description>Run the 'model' command, then have a look at the /opt/langtools/lib/sched.models file for your model - it will tell you what PARISC version you're on.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;To view your compilers patch history, try this:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# swlist -l patch &lt;COMPILER product="" name=""&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Eg for aCC:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# swlist -l patch ACXX&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Steve&lt;/COMPILER&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:23:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/pa-2-0-or-pa-1-x/m-p/2684315#M723270</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven Gillard_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-03-15T16:23:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA 2.0 or PA 1.X ??</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/pa-2-0-or-pa-1-x/m-p/2684316#M723271</link>
      <description>Hi:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you are trying to create code that will run on all (well, most) HP platforms then your best option is to use the +DAportable compiler option. While this will sacrifice some performance on the high-end boxes, you will be able to run on a broader equipment range. Because the vast majority of UNIX programs are not CPU bound or computationally intensive the performance hit will be very small.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you are doing CAD/CAM/analysis work and performance is a major concern then compiling for the different architectures makes sense.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Food for thought, Clay&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:28:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/pa-2-0-or-pa-1-x/m-p/2684316#M723271</guid>
      <dc:creator>A. Clay Stephenson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-03-15T16:28:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA 2.0 or PA 1.X ??</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/pa-2-0-or-pa-1-x/m-p/2684317#M723272</link>
      <description>It always amazes me what a fantastic tool&lt;BR /&gt;this is, that I can throw a question out there&lt;BR /&gt;and get an answer (and then some)just like that!. Great answers everybody, and thank you&lt;BR /&gt;very much. I will assign those points now!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Randy</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:56:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/pa-2-0-or-pa-1-x/m-p/2684317#M723272</guid>
      <dc:creator>Randy_9</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-03-15T16:56:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

