<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic aC++ performance when using templates in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ac-performance-when-using-templates/m-p/2481269#M728243</link>
    <description>I wanted to speed up my own vector class. Therefore I used the method of expression templates to minimize temporary objects used in a calculation. Using g++ a test program was accelerated from 7s to 5s. But using aC++ the new method needed 30s instead of 0.5s without it.&lt;BR /&gt;Has aC++ (A.01.15) performance problems when using templates?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2001 09:47:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Thomas Kollig</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2001-01-10T09:47:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>aC++ performance when using templates</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ac-performance-when-using-templates/m-p/2481269#M728243</link>
      <description>I wanted to speed up my own vector class. Therefore I used the method of expression templates to minimize temporary objects used in a calculation. Using g++ a test program was accelerated from 7s to 5s. But using aC++ the new method needed 30s instead of 0.5s without it.&lt;BR /&gt;Has aC++ (A.01.15) performance problems when using templates?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2001 09:47:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/ac-performance-when-using-templates/m-p/2481269#M728243</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thomas Kollig</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-01-10T09:47:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

