<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Bash / shellshock vulnerability and Apache-based web server in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/bash-shellshock-vulnerability-and-apache-based-web-server/m-p/6654940#M729356</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Having bash (even broken or older versions) does not trigger that sercurity issue. It is only triggered if bash is the DEFAULT shell, which most likely it is not&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:24:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>H.Merijn Brand (procura</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-10-24T06:24:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Bash / shellshock vulnerability and Apache-based web server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/bash-shellshock-vulnerability-and-apache-based-web-server/m-p/6636636#M729354</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have some rp3410s running HP-UX 11.11&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've heard that HP-UX doesn't install bash by default, and so far I can't find any traces of bash on the servers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But this article-&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-29361794" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-29361794&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mentions something that caught my eye- "The problem is particularly serious given that many web servers are run using the Apache system, software which includes the Bash component."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is that true? &amp;nbsp;Does Apache-based web server install some hints of bash here and there?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2014 18:14:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/bash-shellshock-vulnerability-and-apache-based-web-server/m-p/6636636#M729354</guid>
      <dc:creator>JDR45</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-01T18:14:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bash / shellshock vulnerability and Apache-based web server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/bash-shellshock-vulnerability-and-apache-based-web-server/m-p/6641654#M729355</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't believe so--Apache just uses the system's&amp;nbsp;native 'sh' shell as a script&amp;nbsp;interpeter. The wording in the news story&amp;nbsp;is unfortunate.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:58:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/bash-shellshock-vulnerability-and-apache-based-web-server/m-p/6641654#M729355</guid>
      <dc:creator>RJHall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-08T15:58:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Bash / shellshock vulnerability and Apache-based web server</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/bash-shellshock-vulnerability-and-apache-based-web-server/m-p/6654940#M729356</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Having bash (even broken or older versions) does not trigger that sercurity issue. It is only triggered if bash is the DEFAULT shell, which most likely it is not&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2014 06:24:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/bash-shellshock-vulnerability-and-apache-based-web-server/m-p/6654940#M729356</guid>
      <dc:creator>H.Merijn Brand (procura</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-24T06:24:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

