<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Packing changes for vPars in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/packing-changes-for-vpars/m-p/5082141#M731247</link>
    <description>Are you talking about cluster packages?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;From the cluster software point of view a vPar is just like a "normal" standalone system - no special changes needed.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:36:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Torsten.</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-11-30T01:36:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Packing changes for vPars</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/packing-changes-for-vpars/m-p/5082140#M731246</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Are  there any changes required in packaging to make the packages vPar compatible.( After reading some(two) vpar docs, I am 99% sure that the answer will be no)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For userspace applications.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:59:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/packing-changes-for-vpars/m-p/5082140#M731246</guid>
      <dc:creator>Srimalik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-30T00:59:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Packing changes for vPars</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/packing-changes-for-vpars/m-p/5082141#M731247</link>
      <description>Are you talking about cluster packages?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;From the cluster software point of view a vPar is just like a "normal" standalone system - no special changes needed.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:36:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/packing-changes-for-vpars/m-p/5082141#M731247</guid>
      <dc:creator>Torsten.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-30T01:36:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Packing changes for vPars</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/packing-changes-for-vpars/m-p/5082142#M731248</link>
      <description>PAcakaging? maybe you could be a little more specific?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But generally there is no difference between a vpar instance and a stand alone system instance.&lt;BR /&gt;I have never seen any issues and do not expect to see any issues due to it be a vpar.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 05:28:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/packing-changes-for-vpars/m-p/5082142#M731248</guid>
      <dc:creator>melvyn burnard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-30T05:28:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Packing changes for vPars</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/packing-changes-for-vpars/m-p/5082143#M731249</link>
      <description>Thanks melvin&lt;BR /&gt;I was expecting that reply.&lt;BR /&gt;Sri</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:41:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/packing-changes-for-vpars/m-p/5082143#M731249</guid>
      <dc:creator>Srimalik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-11-30T12:41:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

