<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic executable_stack parameter testing in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/executable-stack-parameter-testing/m-p/4185698#M733650</link>
    <description>We are running HP-UX 11i 11.11.  I have been playing around with the executable_stack parameter (currently set to "2", which is the trial or debug mode).  In several months I have not had any errors messages produced from this feature (buffer overflow protection).  I'm just curious if anyone has tried to test this feature - and what they did?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks David</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:05:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>David Irish</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-04-23T20:05:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>executable_stack parameter testing</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/executable-stack-parameter-testing/m-p/4185698#M733650</link>
      <description>We are running HP-UX 11i 11.11.  I have been playing around with the executable_stack parameter (currently set to "2", which is the trial or debug mode).  In several months I have not had any errors messages produced from this feature (buffer overflow protection).  I'm just curious if anyone has tried to test this feature - and what they did?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks David</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:05:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/executable-stack-parameter-testing/m-p/4185698#M733650</guid>
      <dc:creator>David Irish</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-23T20:05:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: executable_stack parameter testing</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/executable-stack-parameter-testing/m-p/4185699#M733651</link>
      <description>Hi David:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you have been running without incident (i.e no logged messages in the 'dmesg' buffer) then it is certainly safe to reset the parameter to zero (0) for full protection.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There are some sample programs in:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://insecure.org/stf/smashstack.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://insecure.org/stf/smashstack.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;...if you are interested for academic curiosity.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;...JRF...</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:39:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/executable-stack-parameter-testing/m-p/4185699#M733651</guid>
      <dc:creator>James R. Ferguson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-04-23T20:39:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

