<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic rp3440 processor identification anomily? in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/rp3440-processor-identification-anomily/m-p/5035110#M757517</link>
    <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;Greetings:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I noticed something odd today, and would be curious to know if anyone has seen this.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have an HP rp3440.  Here's the guts of the info:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# # model ;\&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; echo itick_per_usec/D | adb -k /stand/vmunix /dev/mem ;\&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; echo "sc product cpu;il" | /usr/sbin/cstm | grep grep 'CPU Module'&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;9000/800/rp3440&lt;BR /&gt;itick_per_usec:&lt;BR /&gt;itick_per_usec: 1000&lt;BR /&gt;        PA 8800  CPU Module  3.2&lt;BR /&gt;        PA 8800  CPU Module  3.2&lt;BR /&gt;        PA 8800  CPU Module  3.2&lt;BR /&gt;        PA 8800  CPU Module  3.2&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Here's the thing: I can't find any piece of documentation that shows the rp3440 supporting the PA 8800; only the 8900.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I know they are both dual core processors, and they are almost the same processor.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All I hope to gain by this post is knowing whether or not they are being mis-identified, or if the PA-8800 is an acceptable processor for the rp3440, while it's documentation just doesn't acknowledge that fact.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Anyone?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ref:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12035_div/12035_div.HTML" target="_blank"&gt;http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12035_div/12035_div.HTML&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:15:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Leibniz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-03-20T14:15:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>rp3440 processor identification anomily?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/rp3440-processor-identification-anomily/m-p/5035110#M757517</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;Greetings:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I noticed something odd today, and would be curious to know if anyone has seen this.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have an HP rp3440.  Here's the guts of the info:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# # model ;\&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; echo itick_per_usec/D | adb -k /stand/vmunix /dev/mem ;\&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; echo "sc product cpu;il" | /usr/sbin/cstm | grep grep 'CPU Module'&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;9000/800/rp3440&lt;BR /&gt;itick_per_usec:&lt;BR /&gt;itick_per_usec: 1000&lt;BR /&gt;        PA 8800  CPU Module  3.2&lt;BR /&gt;        PA 8800  CPU Module  3.2&lt;BR /&gt;        PA 8800  CPU Module  3.2&lt;BR /&gt;        PA 8800  CPU Module  3.2&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Here's the thing: I can't find any piece of documentation that shows the rp3440 supporting the PA 8800; only the 8900.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I know they are both dual core processors, and they are almost the same processor.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All I hope to gain by this post is knowing whether or not they are being mis-identified, or if the PA-8800 is an acceptable processor for the rp3440, while it's documentation just doesn't acknowledge that fact.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Anyone?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;ref:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12035_div/12035_div.HTML" target="_blank"&gt;http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12035_div/12035_div.HTML&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:15:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/rp3440-processor-identification-anomily/m-p/5035110#M757517</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leibniz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-20T14:15:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: rp3440 processor identification anomily?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/rp3440-processor-identification-anomily/m-p/5035111#M757518</link>
      <description>I keep a document pinned to the wall above my desk called "HP Hardware @ a Glance - Servers and Storage".  The current one, at least the latest I've seen, is Rev 3.7, Sept, 2006.  You should be able to find this in pdf form through a google search.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This document lists both the PA8800 and PA8900 as being available in the rp3440.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Pete</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:20:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/rp3440-processor-identification-anomily/m-p/5035111#M757518</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pete Randall</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-20T14:20:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: rp3440 processor identification anomily?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/rp3440-processor-identification-anomily/m-p/5035112#M757519</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;the quickspecs say&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;"PA-8800 or PA-8900 processors"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;see&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12035_div/12035_div.HTML" target="_blank"&gt;http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12035_div/12035_div.HTML&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(did you use the search function for "8800"?)</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:42:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/rp3440-processor-identification-anomily/m-p/5035112#M757519</guid>
      <dc:creator>Torsten.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-20T14:42:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: rp3440 processor identification anomily?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/rp3440-processor-identification-anomily/m-p/5035113#M757520</link>
      <description>I could have sworn I double checked this before I posted, but has been noted, its there - large as life.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sorry for the unwarranted post.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:03:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/rp3440-processor-identification-anomily/m-p/5035113#M757520</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leibniz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-20T15:03:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: rp3440 processor identification anomily?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/rp3440-processor-identification-anomily/m-p/5035114#M757521</link>
      <description>Some years ago (perhaps 2003) when the rp3400 series came out the PA-8800 was the only option AFAIR. Later, when the PA-8900 came out, the older CPU became obsolete.&lt;BR /&gt;This is the reason why the old CPU is not mentioned, because you cannot order it anymore.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:17:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/rp3440-processor-identification-anomily/m-p/5035114#M757521</guid>
      <dc:creator>Torsten.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-20T15:17:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

