<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Life after UNIX: Linux, Windows 2000, or more UNIX? in Operating System - HP-UX</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/life-after-unix-linux-windows-2000-or-more-unix/m-p/2415401#M764518</link>
    <description>That's a thorny one: but even UNIX purists will admit that it's&lt;BR /&gt;far easier for Windows to gain acceptance than UNIX, as most&lt;BR /&gt;of the "IT challenged" people out there in the Web Universe will&lt;BR /&gt;not happily spend a week or more getting LINUX up and running&lt;BR /&gt;on their obscure Intel-based Taiwanese PC: rather get the Win&lt;BR /&gt;CD, click "Start", "Run...","setup.exe".......&lt;BR /&gt;And that's what UNIX will have to mature to, if it wants to&lt;BR /&gt;become the desktop OS of choice: a self extracting, self scanning, self &lt;BR /&gt;configuring OS. Granted, I haven't played with &lt;BR /&gt;the latest version of LINUX, but I have a lot of experience in&lt;BR /&gt;the way SCO, HP, and SUN think, and they are all geared &lt;BR /&gt;towards the Enterprise or Corporate administrator, who has &lt;BR /&gt;access to support and maintenance personnel. So, in my guts, I&lt;BR /&gt;feel that by 2001, Windows will still be ahead...</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 1999 01:28:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jakes Louw_2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>1999-07-06T01:28:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Life after UNIX: Linux, Windows 2000, or more UNIX?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/life-after-unix-linux-windows-2000-or-more-unix/m-p/2415394#M764511</link>
      <description>In the age of the Internet, which operating system will rule?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 1999 09:19:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/life-after-unix-linux-windows-2000-or-more-unix/m-p/2415394#M764511</guid>
      <dc:creator>HP Education_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>1999-04-12T09:19:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Life after UNIX: Linux, Windows 2000, or more UNIX?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/life-after-unix-linux-windows-2000-or-more-unix/m-p/2415395#M764512</link>
      <description>hp-ux, solaris and nt will be predominant os'es in my opinion...linux will come &lt;BR /&gt;far, and cause merging of the various unixen, but will be 4-6 years before it &lt;BR /&gt;gains data center mind share.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 1999 08:36:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/life-after-unix-linux-windows-2000-or-more-unix/m-p/2415395#M764512</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bill Jackson_6</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>1999-04-29T08:36:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Life after UNIX: Linux, Windows 2000, or more UNIX?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/life-after-unix-linux-windows-2000-or-more-unix/m-p/2415396#M764513</link>
      <description>hard to predict, each os have different usage and strength.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;linux will become popular os when it is free.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 1999 23:31:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/life-after-unix-linux-windows-2000-or-more-unix/m-p/2415396#M764513</guid>
      <dc:creator>peter_528</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>1999-05-11T23:31:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Life after UNIX: Linux, Windows 2000, or more UNIX?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/life-after-unix-linux-windows-2000-or-more-unix/m-p/2415397#M764514</link>
      <description>I think the flexible LINUX will win the battle considering the numerous &lt;BR /&gt;server-centric Inter/Intranet world. We used to modify even the most stubborn &lt;BR /&gt;MVS code before IBM announced the "Object Code Only" nonsense. AT the same &lt;BR /&gt;token UNIX kernel modification was done in early days to fit or make &lt;BR /&gt;"Lean-and-Mean" unix system. The filrewalls. IP as well as transaction  &lt;BR /&gt;security requirement mandates highly customized platform.  We need a flexible &lt;BR /&gt;operating system to make fit into my world rather than the crappy NT shoved to &lt;BR /&gt;my lap and we have to make it work fiddling with the NT registry to run better, &lt;BR /&gt;What a joke !!!.&lt;BR /&gt;We are using NT as a specializom server and prototyping platform for a new &lt;BR /&gt;apps.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 1999 06:01:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/life-after-unix-linux-windows-2000-or-more-unix/m-p/2415397#M764514</guid>
      <dc:creator>Harry Kwon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>1999-05-14T06:01:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Life after UNIX: Linux, Windows 2000, or more UNIX?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/life-after-unix-linux-windows-2000-or-more-unix/m-p/2415398#M764515</link>
      <description>In a world where everything seems to have it's place, it's becoming &lt;BR /&gt;increasingly harder to say that one OS is better than another OS.  I don't &lt;BR /&gt;think that there will be any 1 OS that will rule the world.  I would LIKE to &lt;BR /&gt;see *NIX systems run the planet and say "buhh-bye" to NT/2000 systems... but &lt;BR /&gt;the fact is, everything has a place.  &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;IMHO,&lt;BR /&gt;Jeff Neuffer Jr.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 1999 11:42:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/life-after-unix-linux-windows-2000-or-more-unix/m-p/2415398#M764515</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jeff Neuffer Jr.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>1999-06-09T11:42:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Life after UNIX: Linux, Windows 2000, or more UNIX?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/life-after-unix-linux-windows-2000-or-more-unix/m-p/2415399#M764516</link>
      <description>Anybody hear about "Pink" (IBM and Apple). Apparently it's going to be up &lt;BR /&gt;there. Check out WIRED for more info.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 1999 10:51:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/life-after-unix-linux-windows-2000-or-more-unix/m-p/2415399#M764516</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kirk Gardner_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>1999-06-10T10:51:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Life after UNIX: Linux, Windows 2000, or more UNIX?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/life-after-unix-linux-windows-2000-or-more-unix/m-p/2415400#M764517</link>
      <description>Until Microsoft stops the memory leaks, assorted "blue screens of death" and &lt;BR /&gt;allows their applications to utilize more memory, UNIX will remain the OS of &lt;BR /&gt;choice for me.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 1999 08:38:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/life-after-unix-linux-windows-2000-or-more-unix/m-p/2415400#M764517</guid>
      <dc:creator>JW_11</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>1999-06-29T08:38:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Life after UNIX: Linux, Windows 2000, or more UNIX?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/life-after-unix-linux-windows-2000-or-more-unix/m-p/2415401#M764518</link>
      <description>That's a thorny one: but even UNIX purists will admit that it's&lt;BR /&gt;far easier for Windows to gain acceptance than UNIX, as most&lt;BR /&gt;of the "IT challenged" people out there in the Web Universe will&lt;BR /&gt;not happily spend a week or more getting LINUX up and running&lt;BR /&gt;on their obscure Intel-based Taiwanese PC: rather get the Win&lt;BR /&gt;CD, click "Start", "Run...","setup.exe".......&lt;BR /&gt;And that's what UNIX will have to mature to, if it wants to&lt;BR /&gt;become the desktop OS of choice: a self extracting, self scanning, self &lt;BR /&gt;configuring OS. Granted, I haven't played with &lt;BR /&gt;the latest version of LINUX, but I have a lot of experience in&lt;BR /&gt;the way SCO, HP, and SUN think, and they are all geared &lt;BR /&gt;towards the Enterprise or Corporate administrator, who has &lt;BR /&gt;access to support and maintenance personnel. So, in my guts, I&lt;BR /&gt;feel that by 2001, Windows will still be ahead...</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 1999 01:28:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/life-after-unix-linux-windows-2000-or-more-unix/m-p/2415401#M764518</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jakes Louw_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>1999-07-06T01:28:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Life after UNIX: Linux, Windows 2000, or more UNIX?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/life-after-unix-linux-windows-2000-or-more-unix/m-p/2415402#M764519</link>
      <description>Depends on what you mean by "rule".&lt;BR /&gt;Those with Micro$oft will think they&lt;BR /&gt;are in control, but those with Linux&lt;BR /&gt;know who really has the power. Check the&lt;BR /&gt;stats on how many internet servers are &lt;BR /&gt;running UNIX/Linux and apache web servers.&lt;BR /&gt;ALSO... When it comes to security vulnerabilities&lt;BR /&gt;is there even a comparison. Look up Denial of&lt;BR /&gt;Service against Windows boxes and then against&lt;BR /&gt;UNIX boxes. You will see what I mean.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 1999 14:22:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/life-after-unix-linux-windows-2000-or-more-unix/m-p/2415402#M764519</guid>
      <dc:creator>Don Cooley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>1999-09-29T14:22:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Life after UNIX: Linux, Windows 2000, or more UNIX?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/life-after-unix-linux-windows-2000-or-more-unix/m-p/2415403#M764520</link>
      <description>MPE will still be around and will still be running those systems that can't &lt;BR /&gt;afford the downtime and maintenance time other OS' require.  Since it is so &lt;BR /&gt;reliable, MPE doesn't get a lot of publicity lately but new system sales of the &lt;BR /&gt;HP3000 are way up.  The reason MPE will still be around is because it's like &lt;BR /&gt;the Energizer Bunny.  It just keeps going, and going, and going...</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 1999 09:47:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/life-after-unix-linux-windows-2000-or-more-unix/m-p/2415403#M764520</guid>
      <dc:creator>george of the jungle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>1999-10-13T09:47:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Life after UNIX: Linux, Windows 2000, or more UNIX?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/life-after-unix-linux-windows-2000-or-more-unix/m-p/2415404#M764521</link>
      <description>If we're talking clients rather than servers : According to some analyst &lt;BR /&gt;groups, in a few years, &lt;BR /&gt;there'll be more wireless/handheld/consumer devices&lt;BR /&gt;on the Net than regular computers, in which case, &lt;BR /&gt;it's their OS(es) that will rule :)&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 1999 02:01:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-hp-ux/life-after-unix-linux-windows-2000-or-more-unix/m-p/2415404#M764521</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vasudev Ram</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>1999-10-19T02:01:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

